Literature DB >> 29207007

Fertility preservation in women harboring deleterious BRCA mutations: ready for prime time?

Fedro Alessandro Peccatori1, Giorgia Mangili2, Alice Bergamini2, Francesca Filippi3, Fabio Martinelli4, Federica Ferrari5, Stefania Noli1,3,6, Emanuela Rabaiotti2, Massimo Candiani2, Edgardo Somigliana3,6.   

Abstract

Fertility issues have become critical in the management and counseling of BRCA mutation carriers. In this setting four points deserve consideration. (1) Women in general lose their ability to conceive at a mean age of 41 years, thus the suggested policy of prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at age 40 for BRCA mutation carriers does not affect the chances of natural pregnancy. Conversely, if the procedure is chosen at 35 years old, oocyte cryopreservation prior to surgery should be considered. (2) Some evidence suggests that ovarian reserve may actually be partly reduced in BRCA mutations carriers and that the mutation may affect ovarian responsiveness to stimulation. However, these findings are still controversial. (3) Breast cancer is not rare before the age of 40 and fertility preservation after diagnosis can be requested in a significant proportion of BRCA mutation carriers. Thus, a policy of oocyte cryopreservation in young healthy carriers deserves consideration. The procedure could be considered at a young age and in an elective setting, when ovarian stimulation may yield more oocytes of better quality. (4) Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) could be considered in BRCA mutations carriers, particularly when good quality oocytes have been stored at a young age. Based on the current knowledge, a univocal approach cannot be recommended; in depth patient counseling is warranted.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRCA; PGD; cancer; fertility preservation; oocytes

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29207007     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dex356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  13 in total

1.  Fertility preservation in women with malignancies: the accuracy of antral follicle count collected randomly during the menstrual cycle in predicting the number of oocytes retrieved.

Authors:  Francesca Filippi; Fabio Martinelli; Alessio Paffoni; Marco Reschini; Francesco Raspagliesi; Edgardo Somigliana
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Update on fertility preservation for younger women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Ellen Warner; Karen Glass; Shu Foong; Emily Sandwith
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  COH outcomes in breast cancer patients for fertility preservation: a comparison with the expected response by age.

Authors:  Elisa Malacarne; Marta Devesa; Francisca Martinez; Ignacio Rodriguez; Buenaventura Coroleu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  ESGO/ESTRO/ESP Guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Nicole Concin; Carien L Creutzberg; Ignace Vergote; David Cibula; Mansoor Raza Mirza; Simone Marnitz; Jonathan A Ledermann; Tjalling Bosse; Cyrus Chargari; Anna Fagotti; Christina Fotopoulou; Antonio González-Martín; Sigurd F Lax; Domenica Lorusso; Christian Marth; Philippe Morice; Remi A Nout; Dearbhaile E O'Donnell; Denis Querleu; Maria Rosaria Raspollini; Jalid Sehouli; Alina E Sturdza; Alexandra Taylor; Anneke M Westermann; Pauline Wimberger; Nicoletta Colombo; François Planchamp; Xavier Matias-Guiu
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 5.  Fertility preservation for genetic diseases leading to premature ovarian insufficiency (POI).

Authors:  Antonio La Marca; Elisa Mastellari
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Precision prophylaxis: Identifying the optimal timing for risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy based on type of BRCA1 and BRCA2 cluster region mutations.

Authors:  Ian Solsky; Jinbo Chen; Timothy R Rebbeck
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 5.304

Review 7.  Fertility preservation in ovarian tumours.

Authors:  Federica Tomao; Anna Di Pinto; Carolina Maria Sassu; Erlisa Bardhi; Violante Di Donato; Ludovico Muzii; Maria Cristina Petrella; Fedro Alessandro Peccatori; Pierluigi Benedetti Panici
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2018-12-06

8.  Impact of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations on ovarian reserve and fertility preservation outcomes in young women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Eleonora Porcu; Giulia Maria Cillo; Linda Cipriani; Federica Sacilotto; Leonardo Notarangelo; Giuseppe Damiano; Maria Dirodi; Ilaria Roncarati
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Vaginal cuff dehiscence following controlled ovarian stimulation recognized during egg retrieval.

Authors:  Alexandra Peyser; Avner Hershlag; Antoinette Sakaris; Tomer Singer
Journal:  Fertil Res Pract       Date:  2019-11-12

10.  Counseling young women with early breast cancer on fertility preservation.

Authors:  M E Elena Ter Welle-Butalid; I J H Ingeborg Vriens; J G Josien Derhaag; E M Edward Leter; C E Christine de Die-Smulders; M Marjolein Smidt; R J T Ron van Golde; V C G Vivianne Tjan-Heijnen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-11-23       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.