| Literature DB >> 35495636 |
M V Iurova1,2, V V Chagovets1, S V Pavlovich1,2, N L Starodubtseva1,3, G N Khabas1, K S Chingin4, A O Tokareva1, G T Sukhikh1,2, V E Frankevich1.
Abstract
Epithelial ovarian cancer (OC) ranks first in the number of deaths among diseases of the female reproductive organs. Identification of OC at early stages is highly beneficial for the treatment but is highly challenging due to the asymptomatic or low-symptom disease development. In this study, lipid extracts of venous blood samples from 41 female volunteers, including 28 therapy-naive patients with histologically verified high-grade serous ovarian cancer at different stages (5 patients with I-II stages; 23 patients with III-IV stages) and 13 apparently healthy women of reproductive age, were profiled by high-performance liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS). Based on MS signals of 128 differential lipid species with statistically significant level variation between the OC patients and control group, an OPLS-DA model was developed for the recognition of OC with 100% sensitivity and specificity R 2 = 0.87 and Q2 = 0.80. The second OPLS-DA model was developed for the differentiation between I-II OC stages and control group with R 2 = 0.97 and Q2 = 0.86 based on the signal levels of 108 differential lipid species. The third OPLS-DA model was developed for the differentiation between I-II OC stages and III-IV stages based on the signal levels of 99 differential lipid species. Various lipid classes (diglycerides, triglycerides, phosphatidylchlorines, ethanolamines, sphingomyelins, ceramides, phosphatidylcholines and phosphoinositols) in blood plasma samples display distinctly characteristic profiles in I-II OC, which indicates the possibility of their use as marker oncolipids in diagnostic molecular panels of early OC stages. Our results suggest that lipid profiling by HPLC-MS can improve identification of early-stage OC and thus increase the efficiency of treatment.Entities:
Keywords: lipidome; mass spectrometry; omics technologies; oncolipids; serous ovarian cancer
Year: 2022 PMID: 35495636 PMCID: PMC9048792 DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.770983
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Mol Biosci ISSN: 2296-889X
Clinical data of patients of the study cohort and control group.
| Clinical Groups | n (%) | Age, years | P | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Me | Q₁–Q₃ | p | Me | Q₁–Q₃ | ||||
| control group | 13 (100) | 49 | 45–52 | 0,355 | 49 | 45–52 | 0.067 | |
|
| IA | 2 (40.0) | 54 | 52–55 | 55 | 54–55 | ||
| IC | 2 (40.0) | 52 | 52–52 | |||||
| IIA | 1 (20.0) | 42 | 40–46 | |||||
|
| IIIB | 3 (13) | 52 | 44–55 | 54 | 51–55 | ||
| IIIC | 17 (79.3) | 48 | 46–50 | |||||
| IVA | 3 (13) | 42 | 40–46 | |||||
FIGURE 1Typical total ion chromatogram of lipid ions recorded in the positive ion detection mode. The chromatogram was obtained by HPLC-MS analysis of the blood plasma extract. The red curve corresponds to the sample obtained from the patient with confirmed OC. The black curve corresponds to the sample from the patient from the control group.
FIGURE 2(A) Score plots based on the results of OPLS-DA analysis of MS data obtained in the positive ion mode for the blood plasma lipid extracts: (A) control group (green dots) and OC of stages I-IV (red dots); (B) control group (green dots) and OC of stages I-II (red dots); (C) OC of stages I-II (red dots) and stages III-IV (blue dots).
Parameters of the developed models.
| Compa-red Groups | Model Type | Independent Variables | R2 | Q2 | AUC | Threshold | Sensitivity | Specificity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control vs. OC stages I-IV | OPLS-DA | 345 identified lipid species | 0.87 | 0.77 | 1 | 0.57 | 1 | 1 |
| Control vs. OC, stages I-II | OPLS-DA | 345 identified lipid species | 0.96 | 0.86 | 1 | 0.53 | 1 | 1 |
| OC, stages I-II vs. III-IV | Logistic Regression | Cer-NS(d18:1/24:0); LPC(20:0); Plasmenyl-PE (P-18:0/20:3); PS(37:5) | - | - | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 |
| CL (28:0) (28:0); LPC(15:0); LPC(18:0); LPC(20:0) | - | - | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | ||
| CL (28:0) (28:0); LPC(15:0); LPC(20:0); OxLPC(18:3(OOO)) | - | - | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | ||
| CL (28:0) (28:0); LPC(18:0); Plasmanyl-LPC(O-16:0); Plasmenyl-PC(P-16:1/18:0) | - | - | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 |
FIGURE 3The Kennedy pathway (de novo synthesis of PE, PC and LPA from choline and phosphatidic acid) presenting the potential role of glycerophospholipids metabolism on cancerogenesis (according to Plewa et al. (Plewa et al., 2019)).