Literature DB >> 30675902

Characterization of a prototype rapid kilovoltage x-ray image guidance system designed for a ring shape radiation therapy unit.

Bin Cai1, Eric Laugeman1, Thomas R Mazur1, Justin C Park1, Lauren E Henke1, Hyun Kim1, Geoffrey D Hugo1, Sasa Mutic1, Hua Li1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aims to characterize the performance of a prototype rapid kilovoltage (kV) x-ray image guidance system onboard the newly released Halcyon 2.0 linear accelerator (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) by use of conventional and innovatively designed testing procedures.
METHODS: Basic imaging system performance tests and radiation dose measurements were performed for all eleven kV-cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging protocols available on a preclinical Halcyon 2.0 LINAC. Both conventional CBCT reconstruction using the Feldkamp-Davis-Kress (FDK) algorithm and a novel, advanced iterative reconstruction (iCBCT) available on this platform were evaluated. Standard image quality metrics, including slice thickness accuracy, high-contrast resolution, low-contrast resolution, regional uniformity and noise, and CT Hounsfield unit (HU) number accuracy and linearity were evaluated using a manufacturer-supplied QUART phantom (GmbH, Zorneding, Germany) and an independent image quality phantom (Catphan 500, The Phantom Laboratory, New York, NY). Due to the simplified design of the QUART phantom, we developed surrogate and clinically feasible strategies for measuring slice thickness and high- and low-contrast resolution. Imaging dose delivered by these eleven protocols was measured using a computed tomography dose index phantom and pencil chamber with commonly accepted methods and procedures. A subset of measurements were repeated on a conventional C-arm LINAC (TrueBeam and Trilogy, Varian Medical System) for comparison. Clinical patient images of pelvic and abdominal regions are also presented for qualitative assessment as part of a feasibility study for clinical implementation.
RESULTS: Image acquisition time was 17-42 s on the Halcyon system compared with 60 s on the C-arm LINAC systems. The kV imager projection offset, imaging and treatment isocenter coincidence and the couch three-dimensional match movement all achieved less than1 mm mechanical accuracy. All major image quality metrics were within either the national guideline or vendor-recommended tolerances. The designed surrogate approach with the QUART phantom showed a range of 0.24-0.35 cycles/mm for spatial resolution, a contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of 2-20 for FDK reconstruction and a tolerance of 0.5 mm for slice thickness. Other metrics derived from the Catphan images obtained on the Halcyon and C-arm LINACs showed comparable values for the FDK reconstruction. The iterative reconstruction tended to reduce noise, as evidenced by a higher CNR ratio. The fast scan pelvis protocols for Halcyon resulted in 50% lower dose compared to the standard scans, and the thorax fast protocol similarly delivered 10% lower dose than the standard thoracic scan. Preliminary patient images indicated that rapid kV CBCT with breath-hold is feasible, with improved imaging quality compared to free-breathing scans.
CONCLUSION: Independent and comprehensive characterization of the kV imaging guidance system on the Halcyon 2.0 system demonstrated acceptable image quality for clinical use. The imaging unit onboard the Halcyon meets vendor specifications and satisfies requirements for routine clinical use. The fast kV imaging system enables the potential for volumetric CBCT acquisition during a single breath-hold and the iterative reconstruction tends to reduce the noise therefore has the potential to improve the CNR for normal size patient.
© 2019 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  KV-IGRT; fast CBCT imaging; ring gantry LINAC

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30675902      PMCID: PMC8188470          DOI: 10.1002/mp.13396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  18 in total

1.  Task Group 142 report: quality assurance of medical accelerators.

Authors:  Eric E Klein; Joseph Hanley; John Bayouth; Fang-Fang Yin; William Simon; Sean Dresser; Christopher Serago; Francisco Aguirre; Lijun Ma; Bijan Arjomandy; Chihray Liu; Carlos Sandin; Todd Holmes
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Simulated Online Adaptive Magnetic Resonance-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Oligometastatic Disease of the Abdomen and Central Thorax: Characterization of Potential Advantages.

Authors:  Lauren Henke; Rojano Kashani; Deshan Yang; Tianyu Zhao; Olga Green; Lindsey Olsen; Vivian Rodriguez; H Omar Wooten; H Harold Li; Yanle Hu; Jeffrey Bradley; Clifford Robinson; Parag Parikh; Jeff Michalski; Sasa Mutic; Jeffrey R Olsen
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Acuros CTS: A fast, linear Boltzmann transport equation solver for computed tomography scatter - Part II: System modeling, scatter correction, and optimization.

Authors:  Adam Wang; Alexander Maslowski; Philippe Messmer; Mathias Lehmann; Adam Strzelecki; Elaine Yu; Pascal Paysan; Marcus Brehm; Peter Munro; Josh Star-Lack; Dieter Seghers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Comprehensive QA for radiation oncology: report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 40.

Authors:  G J Kutcher; L Coia; M Gillin; W F Hanson; S Leibel; R J Morton; J R Palta; J A Purdy; L E Reinstein; G K Svensson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Estimating the need for radiotherapy for patients with prostate, breast, and lung cancers: verification of model estimates of need with radiotherapy utilization data from British Columbia.

Authors:  Scott Tyldesley; Geoff Delaney; Farshad Foroudi; Lisa Barbera; Marc Kerba; William Mackillop
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Global cancer statistics, 2012.

Authors:  Lindsey A Torre; Freddie Bray; Rebecca L Siegel; Jacques Ferlay; Joannie Lortet-Tieulent; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 7.  Estimating the demand for radiotherapy from the evidence: a review of changes from 2003 to 2012.

Authors:  Michael B Barton; Susannah Jacob; Jesmin Shafiq; Karen Wong; Stephen R Thompson; Timothy P Hanna; Geoff P Delaney
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 6.280

8.  Image quality and absorbed dose comparison of single- and dual-source cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Hideharu Miura; Shuichi Ozawa; Toshiya Okazue; Atsushi Kawakubo; Kiyoshi Yamada; Yasushi Nagata
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Normal tissue doses from MV image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) using orthogonal MV and MV-CBCT.

Authors:  Yuting Li; Tucker Netherton; Paige L Nitsch; Peter A Balter; Song Gao; Ann H Klopp; Laurence E Court
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-03-03       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Evaluation of the truebeam machine performance check (MPC) geometric checks for daily IGRT geometric accuracy quality assurance.

Authors:  Michael P Barnes; Peter B Greer
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  13 in total

1.  Long-term Inter-protocol kV CBCT image quality assessment for a ring-gantry linac via automated QA approach.

Authors:  Jiayuan Peng; Hua Li; Eric Laugeman; Thomas Mazur; Dao Lam; Taoran Li; Baozhou Sun; Weigang Hu; Lei Dong; Geoffrey D Hugo; Sasa Mutic; Bin Cai
Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express       Date:  2020-01-20

Review 2.  Covert COVID-19: Cone Beam Computed Tomography Lung Changes in an Asymptomatic Patient Receiving Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Irini Youssef; Bernadine Donahue; Mark Flyer; Sharon Thompson; Alice Huang; Fleure Gallant
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-05-19

3.  Cone-beam computed tomography-guided online adaptive radiotherapy is feasible for prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Lisanne G M Zwart; Francisca Ong; Liselotte A Ten Asbroek; Erik B van Dieren; Siete A Koch; Anand Bhawanie; Elisabeth de Wit; Judith J Dasselaar
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-05-14

4.  Evaluation of scatter rejection and correction performance of 2D antiscatter grids in cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Yeonok Park; Timur Alexeev; Brian Miller; Moyed Miften; Cem Altunbas
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Intracranial Stereotactic Radiation Therapy With a Jawless Ring Gantry Linear Accelerator Equipped With New Dual Layer Multileaf Collimator.

Authors:  Nels C Knutson; William R Kennedy; Francisco J Reynoso; Jiayuan Peng; Lauren E Henke; Eric Laugeman; Michael Watts; Jessica Hillard; Ana Heermann; Geoffrey D Hugo; Sasa Mutic; Bin Cai
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-01-28

6.  Per-fraction positional and dosimetric performance of prone breast tangential radiotherapy on Halcyon™ linear accelerator assessed with daily rapid kilo-voltage cone beam computed tomography: a single-institution pilot study.

Authors:  Suk W Yoon; Neil K Taunk; Gary M Freedman; Emily Hubley; Shannon O'Reilly; Boon- Keng K Teo; Shibu Anamalayil; Lei Dong; Christopher Kennedy; Wei Zou; James M Metz; Taoran Li
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Prostate SBRT using O-Ring Halcyon Linac - Plan quality, delivery efficiency, and accuracy.

Authors:  Damodar Pokhrel; Tanner Tackett; Joseph Stephen; Justin Visak; Falguni Amin-Zimmerman; Andrew McGregor; Stephen E Strup; William St Clair
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-12-19       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Clinical validation of ring-mounted halcyon linac for lung SBRT: comparison to SBRT-dedicated C-arm linac treatments.

Authors:  Damodar Pokhrel; Justin Visak; Lana C Critchfield; Joseph Stephen; Mark E Bernard; Marcus Randall; Mahesh Kudrimoti
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-12-20       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Future mainstream platform for online adaptive radiotherapy will be using on-board MR rather than on-board (CB) CT images.

Authors:  Daniel E Hyer; Bin Cai; Yi Rong
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-07-18       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Technical Note: Comparison of the internal target volume (ITV) contours and dose calculations on 4DCT, average CBCT, and 4DCBCT imaging for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).

Authors:  Michael Dumas; Eric Laugeman; Parag Sevak; Karen C Snyder; Weihua Mao; Indrin J Chetty; Munther Ajlouni; Ning Wen
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 2.243

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.