Literature DB >> 30643310

Student Self-Analysis of Their Nonsterile Preparations and its Effect on Compounding Confidence.

Joyce S Jih1, Robert P Shrewsbury1.   

Abstract

Objective. To determine if students who self-analyzed their own nonsterile preparations had increased confidence in their compounding skill. Methods. Self-efficacy surveys were given to P1 and P3 students at the beginning and conclusion of a semester in which they completed their regularly scheduled compounding course. The survey assessed their confidence in general compounding skills and their perception if an additional self-analytical component to determine the potency of their nonsterile preparations would improve their confidence level score. Results. P1 and P3 students reported increased confidence in all surveyed areas at the end of the semester, with P1 students showing more dramatic increases most likely due to this being their first compounding experience in this academic institution. P1 students reported a modest but significant decrease in their perception that potency self-analysis would affect their compounding ability [9.38 (SD 1.12) to 8.98 (SD 1.18)] while P3 students had a significant increase [8.09 (SD 2.18) to 8.68 (SD 1.82)] in the same item. This study also hypothesized that students who made nonsterile compounded preparations with <10% error would have greater confidence improvement. However, no statistical differences were found. Conclusion. Self-analysis of nonsterile preparations increased student confidence to approximately 85%. A self-analysis component included in a compounding laboratory experience is beneficial in increasing student confidence in compounding skill and nonsterile preparation quality assessment.

Keywords:  compounding; confidence; course structure; potency analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30643310      PMCID: PMC6325456          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe6473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  12 in total

1.  Why analytical testing is needed in pharmaceutical compounding.

Authors:  Hassan Almoazen; Anthony C Samsa; Charles N May
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  A comparison of pharmacy students' confidence and test performance.

Authors:  Connie A Valdez; David Thompson; Heather Ulrich; Hilda Bi; Susan Paulsen
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Impact of required versus optional remake of a preparation on pharmacy students' compounding accuracy.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Alford; Robert P Shrewsbury
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Accuracy in prescriptions compounded by pharmacy students.

Authors:  R P Shrewsbury; K H Deloatch
Journal:  Int J Pharm Compd       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr

5.  Independent community pharmacists' perspectives on compounding in contemporary pharmacy education.

Authors:  Kathleen S Martin; Timothy B McPherson; Patrick E Fontane; Tricia Berry; Rasma Chereson; Rhonda Bilger
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  Clinical confidence and skills of medical students: use of an OSCE to enhance confidence in clinical skills.

Authors:  S R Ytterberg; I B Harris; S S Allen; D C Anderson; P M Kofron; J H Kvasnicka; J P McCord; J H Moller
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 6.893

7.  Long-term Results of an Analytical Assessment of Student Compounded Preparations.

Authors:  Angie M Roark; Heidi N Anksorus; Robert P Shrewsbury
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 2.047

8.  Assessment and recommendations of compounding education in AACP member institutions.

Authors:  Robert Shrewsbury; Sam Augustine; Christine Birnie; Karen Nagel; Dipan Ray; James Ruble; Kelly Scolaro; Jennifer Athay Adams
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 2.047

9.  A renaissance in pharmacy education at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Authors:  Mary T Roth; Russell J Mumper; Scott F Singleton; Craig R Lee; Philip T Rodgers; Wendy C Cox; Jacqueline E McLaughlin; Pam Joyner; Robert A Blouin
Journal:  N C Med J       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb

10.  Analysis of compounded pharmaceutical products to teach the importance of quality in an applied pharmaceutics laboratory course.

Authors:  Alyssa Pignato; Christine R Birnie
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 2.047

View more
  2 in total

1.  A Student-Led Elective Provides Quality Improvement Feedback for a Required Compounding Course.

Authors:  Emily C Darst; Tanya K Makhlouf; Erin C Brannick; Taylor B Mitchell; Robert P Shrewsbury
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Potency Analyses Provide Insight Into Student Aseptic Compounding Technique Errors.

Authors:  Rebecca K Lee; Robert P Shrewsbury
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.047

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.