Literature DB >> 30642953

Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news.

Dietram A Scheufele1, Nicole M Krause1.   

Abstract

Concerns about public misinformation in the United States-ranging from politics to science-are growing. Here, we provide an overview of how and why citizens become (and sometimes remain) misinformed about science. Our discussion focuses specifically on misinformation among individual citizens. However, it is impossible to understand individual information processing and acceptance without taking into account social networks, information ecologies, and other macro-level variables that provide important social context. Specifically, we show how being misinformed is a function of a person's ability and motivation to spot falsehoods, but also of other group-level and societal factors that increase the chances of citizens to be exposed to correct(ive) information. We conclude by discussing a number of research areas-some of which echo themes of the 2017 National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine's Communicating Science Effectively report-that will be particularly important for our future understanding of misinformation, specifically a systems approach to the problem of misinformation, the need for more systematic analyses of science communication in new media environments, and a (re)focusing on traditionally underserved audiences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  disinformation; fake news; misinformation; motivated reasoning; science literacy

Year:  2019        PMID: 30642953      PMCID: PMC6475373          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1805871115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  14 in total

Review 1.  The case for motivated reasoning.

Authors:  Z Kunda
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Scientific literacy. NSF board draws flak for dropping evolution from Indicators.

Authors:  Yudhijit Bhattacharjee
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Communicating science in social settings.

Authors:  Dietram A Scheufele
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  New media landscapes and the science information consumer.

Authors:  Dominique Brossard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing.

Authors:  Stephan Lewandowsky; Ullrich K H Ecker; Colleen M Seifert; Norbert Schwarz; John Cook
Journal:  Psychol Sci Public Interest       Date:  2012-12

6.  The science of sharing and the sharing of science.

Authors:  Katherine L Milkman; Jonah Berger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Science communication as political communication.

Authors:  Dietram A Scheufele
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Planting misinformation in the human mind: a 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory.

Authors:  Elizabeth F Loftus
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2005-07-18       Impact factor: 2.460

9.  Why Education Predicts Decreased Belief in Conspiracy Theories.

Authors:  Jan-Willem van Prooijen
Journal:  Appl Cogn Psychol       Date:  2016-11-28

10.  The "Majority Illusion" in Social Networks.

Authors:  Kristina Lerman; Xiaoran Yan; Xin-Zeng Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  59 in total

1.  The Science of Science Communication III.

Authors:  Baruch Fischhoff; Dietram A Scheufele
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  What we know about effective public engagement on CRISPR and beyond.

Authors:  Dietram A Scheufele; Nicole M Krause; Isabelle Freiling; Dominique Brossard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  An Assessment of the Rapid Decline of Trust in US Sources of Public Information about COVID-19.

Authors:  Carl A Latkin; Lauren Dayton; Justin C Strickland; Brian Colon; Rajiv Rimal; Basmattee Boodram
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2020-10-02

4.  The cognitive foundations of misinformation on science: What we know and what scientists can do about it.

Authors:  Antoine Marie; Sacha Altay; Brent Strickland
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 8.807

5.  Why are people antiscience, and what can we do about it?

Authors:  Aviva Philipp-Muller; Spike W S Lee; Richard E Petty
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 12.779

6.  Dynamics of cross-platform attention to retracted papers.

Authors:  Hao Peng; Daniel M Romero; Emőke-Ágnes Horvát
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 12.779

Review 7.  COVID-19 false dichotomies and a comprehensive review of the evidence regarding public health, COVID-19 symptomatology, SARS-CoV-2 transmission, mask wearing, and reinfection.

Authors:  Kevin Escandón; Angela L Rasmussen; Isaac I Bogoch; Eleanor J Murray; Karina Escandón; Saskia V Popescu; Jason Kindrachuk
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 3.090

8.  March Mammal Madness and the power of narrative in science outreach.

Authors:  Katie Hinde; Carlos Eduardo G Amorim; Alyson F Brokaw; Nicole Burt; Mary C Casillas; Albert Chen; Tara Chestnut; Patrice K Connors; Mauna Dasari; Connor Fox Ditelberg; Jeanne Dietrick; Josh Drew; Lara Durgavich; Brian Easterling; Charon Henning; Anne Hilborn; Elinor K Karlsson; Marc Kissel; Jennifer Kobylecky; Jason Krell; Danielle N Lee; Kate M Lesciotto; Kristi L Lewton; Jessica E Light; Jessica Martin; Asia Murphy; William Nickley; Alejandra Núñez-de la Mora; Olivia Pellicer; Valeria Pellicer; Anali Maughan Perry; Stephanie G Schuttler; Anne C Stone; Brian Tanis; Jesse Weber; Melissa Wilson; Emma Willcocks; Christopher N Anderson
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Digital media and misinformation: An outlook on multidisciplinary strategies against manipulation.

Authors:  Danielle Caled; Mário J Silva
Journal:  J Comput Soc Sci       Date:  2021-05-27

10.  Establishing a baseline of science communication skills in an undergraduate environmental science course.

Authors:  Rashmi Shivni; Christina Cline; Morgan Newport; Shupei Yuan; Heather E Bergan-Roller
Journal:  Int J STEM Educ       Date:  2021-07-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.