| Literature DB >> 34050014 |
Dietram A Scheufele1,2, Nicole M Krause3, Isabelle Freiling4, Dominique Brossard3,2.
Abstract
Advances in gene editing technologies for human, plant, and animal applications have led to calls from bench and social scientists, as well as a wide variety of societal stakeholders, for broad public engagement in the decision-making about these new technologies. Unfortunately, there is limited understanding among the groups calling for public engagement on CRISPR and other emerging technologies about 1) the goals of this engagement, 2) the modes of engagement and what we know from systematic social scientific evaluations about their effectiveness, and 3) how to connect the products of these engagement exercises to societal decision or policy making. Addressing all three areas, we systematize common goals, principles, and modalities of public engagement. We evaluate empirically the likely successes of various modalities. Finally, we outline three pathways forward that deserve close attention from the scientific community as we navigate the world of Life 2.0.Entities:
Keywords: deliberation; political communication; public engagement; public participation; science communication
Year: 2021 PMID: 34050014 PMCID: PMC8179128 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2004835117
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205