Literature DB >> 25225360

The science of sharing and the sharing of science.

Katherine L Milkman1, Jonah Berger2.   

Abstract

Why do members of the public share some scientific findings and not others? What can scientists do to increase the chances that their findings will be shared widely among nonscientists? To address these questions, we integrate past research on the psychological drivers of interpersonal communication with a study examining the sharing of hundreds of recent scientific discoveries. Our findings offer insights into (i) how attributes of a discovery and the way it is described impact sharing, (ii) who generates discoveries that are likely to be shared, and (iii) which types of people are most likely to share scientific discoveries. The results described here, combined with a review of recent research on interpersonal communication, suggest how scientists can frame their work to increase its dissemination. They also provide insights about which audiences may be the best targets for the diffusion of scientific content.

Entities:  

Keywords:  framing; science communication; social transmission; word of mouth

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25225360      PMCID: PMC4183177          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1317511111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  10 in total

1.  Emotional selection in memes: the case of urban legends.

Authors:  C Bell; E Sternberg
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2001-12

2.  Temporal distance and discrimination: an audit study in academia.

Authors:  Katherine L Milkman; Modupe Akinola; Dolly Chugh
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-05-21

3.  Assessing what to address in science communication.

Authors:  Wändi Bruine de Bruin; Ann Bostrom
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.

Authors:  P E Shrout; J L Fleiss
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Arousal increases social transmission of information.

Authors:  Jonah Berger
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-06-20

6.  Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science.

Authors:  Stephen J Ceci; Wendy M Williams
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Conducting behavioral research on Amazon's Mechanical Turk.

Authors:  Winter Mason; Siddharth Suri
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2012-03

8.  From social talk to social action: shaping the social triad with emotion sharing.

Authors:  Kim Peters; Yoshihisa Kashima
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2007-11

9.  Dearth by a Thousand Cuts? Accounting for Gender Differences in Top-Ranked Publication Rates in Social Psychology.

Authors:  Mina Cikara; Laurie Rudman; Susan Fiske
Journal:  J Soc Issues       Date:  2012

10.  Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students.

Authors:  Corinne A Moss-Racusin; John F Dovidio; Victoria L Brescoll; Mark J Graham; Jo Handelsman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

  10 in total
  19 in total

1.  Facial appearance affects science communication.

Authors:  Ana I Gheorghiu; Mitchell J Callan; William J Skylark
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news.

Authors:  Dietram A Scheufele; Nicole M Krause
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The Science of Science Communication II.

Authors:  Baruch Fischhoff; Dietram A Scheufele
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  What Is Dissemination and Implementation Science?: An Introduction and Opportunities to Advance Behavioral Medicine and Public Health Globally.

Authors:  Rachel C Shelton; Matthew Lee; Laura E Brotzman; Luke Wolfenden; Nicole Nathan; Milton L Wainberg
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2020-02

5.  Gender inequities in the online dissemination of scholars' work.

Authors:  Orsolya Vásárhelyi; Igor Zakhlebin; Staša Milojević; Emőke-Ágnes Horvát
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Dynamics of cross-platform attention to retracted papers.

Authors:  Hao Peng; Daniel M Romero; Emőke-Ágnes Horvát
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 12.779

7.  Online polarization and cross-fertilization in multi-cleavage societies: the case of Spain.

Authors:  Rubén Rodríguez Casañ; Enrique García-Vidal; Didier Grimaldi; Carlos Carrasco-Farré; Francisco Vaquer-Estalrich; Joan Vila-Francés
Journal:  Soc Netw Anal Min       Date:  2022-07-13

8.  Elevated Inter-Brain Coherence Between Subjects With Concordant Stances During Discussion of Social Issues.

Authors:  Christian Richard; Marija Stevanović Karić; Marissa McConnell; Jared Poole; Greg Rupp; Abigail Fink; Amir Meghdadi; Chris Berka
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  What's not in the news headlines or titles of Alzheimer disease articles? #InMice.

Authors:  Marcia Triunfol; Fabio C Gouveia
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Out-group animosity drives engagement on social media.

Authors:  Steve Rathje; Jay J Van Bavel; Sander van der Linden
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.