Literature DB >> 23940341

Communicating science in social settings.

Dietram A Scheufele1.   

Abstract

This essay examines the societal dynamics surrounding modern science. It first discusses a number of challenges facing any effort to communicate science in social environments: lay publics with varying levels of preparedness for fully understanding new scientific breakthroughs; the deterioration of traditional media infrastructures; and an increasingly complex set of emerging technologies that are surrounded by a host of ethical, legal, and social considerations. Based on this overview, I discuss four areas in which empirical social science helps clarify intuitive but sometimes faulty assumptions about the social-level mechanisms of science communication and outline an agenda for bench and social scientists--driven by current social-scientific research in the field of science communication--to guide more effective communication efforts at the societal level in the future.

Keywords:  communication theory; journalism; mass media; public opinion

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23940341      PMCID: PMC3752169          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1213275110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  12 in total

1.  False reports and the ears of men.

Authors:  A M Shelton; R T Roush
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Transgenic pollen harms monarch larvae.

Authors:  J E Losey; L S Rayor; M E Carter
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-05-20       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  The case for motivated reasoning.

Authors:  Z Kunda
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Science communication. Public acceptance of evolution.

Authors:  Jon D Miller; Eugenie C Scott; Shinji Okamoto
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-08-11       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  An attack on science? Media use, trust in scientists, and perceptions of global warming.

Authors:  Jay D Hmielowski; Lauren Feldman; Teresa A Myers; Anthony Leiserowitz; Edward Maibach
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2013-04-03

6.  New media landscapes and the science information consumer.

Authors:  Dominique Brossard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Anticipating the perceived risk of nanotechnologies.

Authors:  Terre Satterfield; Milind Kandlikar; Christian E H Beaudrie; Joseph Conti; Barbara Herr Harthorn
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 39.213

8.  What's next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions.

Authors:  Matthew C Nisbet; Dietram A Scheufele
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2009-09-03       Impact factor: 3.844

9.  The changing information environment for nanotechnology: online audiences and content.

Authors:  Ashley A Anderson; Dominique Brossard; Dietram A Scheufele
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2010-02-07       Impact factor: 2.253

10.  Of risks and regulations: how leading U.S. nanoscientists form policy stances about nanotechnology.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Corley; Dietram A Scheufele; Qian Hu
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 2.253

View more
  21 in total

1.  The sciences of science communication.

Authors:  Baruch Fischhoff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Science, health, and cultural literacy in a rapidly changing communications landscape.

Authors:  Susan C Scrimshaw
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Evaluating science communication.

Authors:  Baruch Fischhoff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Promises and perils of gene drives: Navigating the communication of complex, post-normal science.

Authors:  Dominique Brossard; Pam Belluck; Fred Gould; Christopher D Wirz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news.

Authors:  Dietram A Scheufele; Nicole M Krause
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Leveraging scientific credibility about Arctic sea ice trends in a polarized political environment.

Authors:  Kathleen Hall Jamieson; Bruce W Hardy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Science communication as political communication.

Authors:  Dietram A Scheufele
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Science cafés: engaging scientists and community through health and science dialogue.

Authors:  Syed Ahmed; Mia C DeFino; Emily R Connors; Anne Kissack; Zeno Franco
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 4.689

9.  Establishing a baseline of science communication skills in an undergraduate environmental science course.

Authors:  Rashmi Shivni; Christina Cline; Morgan Newport; Shupei Yuan; Heather E Bergan-Roller
Journal:  Int J STEM Educ       Date:  2021-07-23

10.  Lessons From the UK's Lockdown: Discourse on Behavioural Science in Times of COVID-19.

Authors:  Jet G Sanders; Alessia Tosi; Sandra Obradovic; Ilaria Miligi; Liam Delaney
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.