Literature DB >> 30568301

Programmable design of orthogonal protein heterodimers.

Zibo Chen1,2,3, Scott E Boyken1,2, Mengxuan Jia4, Florian Busch4, David Flores-Solis5, Matthew J Bick1,2, Peilong Lu1,2, Zachary L VanAernum4, Aniruddha Sahasrabuddhe4, Robert A Langan1,2,3, Sherry Bermeo1,2,3, T J Brunette1,2, Vikram Khipple Mulligan1,2, Lauren P Carter1,2, Frank DiMaio1,2, Nikolaos G Sgourakis5, Vicki H Wysocki4, David Baker6,7,8.   

Abstract

Specificity of interactions between two DNA strands, or between protein and DNA, is often achieved by varying bases or side chains coming off the DNA or protein backbone-for example, the bases participating in Watson-Crick pairing in the double helix, or the side chains contacting DNA in TALEN-DNA complexes. By contrast, specificity of protein-protein interactions usually involves backbone shape complementarity1, which is less modular and hence harder to generalize. Coiled-coil heterodimers are an exception, but the restricted geometry of interactions across the heterodimer interface (primarily at the heptad a and d positions2) limits the number of orthogonal pairs that can be created simply by varying side-chain interactions3,4. Here we show that protein-protein interaction specificity can be achieved using extensive and modular side-chain hydrogen-bond networks. We used the Crick generating equations5 to produce millions of four-helix backbones with varying degrees of supercoiling around a central axis, identified those accommodating extensive hydrogen-bond networks, and used Rosetta to connect pairs of helices with short loops and to optimize the remainder of the sequence. Of 97 such designs expressed in Escherichia coli, 65 formed constitutive heterodimers, and the crystal structures of four designs were in close agreement with the computational models and confirmed the designed hydrogen-bond networks. In cells, six heterodimers were fully orthogonal, and in vitro-following mixing of 32 chains from 16 heterodimer designs, denaturation in 5 M guanidine hydrochloride and reannealing-almost all of the interactions observed by native mass spectrometry were between the designed cognate pairs. The ability to design orthogonal protein heterodimers should enable sophisticated protein-based control logic for synthetic biology, and illustrates that nature has not fully explored the possibilities for programmable biomolecular interaction modalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30568301      PMCID: PMC6537907          DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0802-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  51 in total

1.  Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices.

Authors:  D T Jones
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-09-17       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Polar networks control oligomeric assembly in membranes.

Authors:  Chad D Tatko; Vikas Nanda; James D Lear; William F Degrado
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Stability of 100 homo and heterotypic coiled-coil a-a' pairs for ten amino acids (A, L, I, V, N, K, S, T, E, and R).

Authors:  Asha Acharya; Vikas Rishi; Charles Vinson
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2006-09-26       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  A switch between two-, three-, and four-stranded coiled coils in GCN4 leucine zipper mutants.

Authors:  P B Harbury; T Zhang; P S Kim; T Alber
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-11-26       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Probing designability via a generalized model of helical bundle geometry.

Authors:  Gevorg Grigoryan; William F Degrado
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Characterizing flexible and intrinsically unstructured biological macromolecules by SAS using the Porod-Debye law.

Authors:  Robert P Rambo; John A Tainer
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 2.505

7.  Buried polar residues and structural specificity in the GCN4 leucine zipper.

Authors:  L Gonzalez; D N Woolfson; T Alber
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  1996-12

8.  High efficiency transformation of intact yeast cells using single stranded nucleic acids as a carrier.

Authors:  R H Schiestl; R D Gietz
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 3.886

9.  ROSETTA3: an object-oriented software suite for the simulation and design of macromolecules.

Authors:  Andrew Leaver-Fay; Michael Tyka; Steven M Lewis; Oliver F Lange; James Thompson; Ron Jacak; Kristian Kaufman; P Douglas Renfrew; Colin A Smith; Will Sheffler; Ian W Davis; Seth Cooper; Adrien Treuille; Daniel J Mandell; Florian Richter; Yih-En Andrew Ban; Sarel J Fleishman; Jacob E Corn; David E Kim; Sergey Lyskov; Monica Berrondo; Stuart Mentzer; Zoran Popović; James J Havranek; John Karanicolas; Rhiju Das; Jens Meiler; Tanja Kortemme; Jeffrey J Gray; Brian Kuhlman; David Baker; Philip Bradley
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.600

10.  TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-04-22       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  39 in total

Review 1.  Using Large Datasets to Understand Nanotechnology.

Authors:  Kalina Paunovska; David Loughrey; Cory D Sago; Robert Langer; James E Dahlman
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 30.849

Review 2.  What has de novo protein design taught us about protein folding and biophysics?

Authors:  David Baker
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Rapid online buffer exchange for screening of proteins, protein complexes and cell lysates by native mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Zachary L VanAernum; Florian Busch; Benjamin J Jones; Mengxuan Jia; Zibo Chen; Scott E Boyken; Aniruddha Sahasrabuddhe; David Baker; Vicki H Wysocki
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 13.491

4.  When de novo-designed protein logics meet CAR-T therapies.

Authors:  Mingqi Xie; Peilong Lu
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 25.617

5.  Design and structure of two new protein cages illustrate successes and ongoing challenges in protein engineering.

Authors:  Kevin A Cannon; Rachel U Park; Scott E Boyken; Una Nattermann; Sue Yi; David Baker; Neil P King; Todd O Yeates
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Solution thermochemistry of concanavalin A tetramer conformers measured by variable-temperature ESI-IMS-MS.

Authors:  Tarick J El-Baba; David E Clemmer
Journal:  Int J Mass Spectrom       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 7.  De novo protein design, a retrospective.

Authors:  Ivan V Korendovych; William F DeGrado
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 5.318

8.  Multicomponent Bioluminescence Imaging with a π-Extended Luciferin.

Authors:  Zi Yao; Brendan S Zhang; Rachel C Steinhardt; Jeremy H Mills; Jennifer A Prescher
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 9.  Programmable protein circuit design.

Authors:  Zibo Chen; Michael B Elowitz
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Structural characterization of the self-association domain of swallow.

Authors:  Nikolaus M Loening; Elisar Barbar
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 6.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.