Literature DB >> 31840320

Design and structure of two new protein cages illustrate successes and ongoing challenges in protein engineering.

Kevin A Cannon1,2, Rachel U Park3, Scott E Boyken3,4, Una Nattermann3,4,5, Sue Yi3,4, David Baker3,4,6, Neil P King3,4, Todd O Yeates1,2,7.   

Abstract

In recent years, new protein engineering methods have produced more than a dozen symmetric, self-assembling protein cages whose structures have been validated to match their design models with near-atomic accuracy. However, many protein cage designs that are tested in the lab do not form the desired assembly, and improving the success rate of design has been a point of recent emphasis. Here we present two protein structures solved by X-ray crystallography of designed protein oligomers that form two-component cages with tetrahedral symmetry. To improve on the past tendency toward poorly soluble protein, we used a computational protocol that favors the formation of hydrogen-bonding networks over exclusively hydrophobic interactions to stabilize the designed protein-protein interfaces. Preliminary characterization showed highly soluble expression, and solution studies indicated successful cage formation by both designed proteins. For one of the designs, a crystal structure confirmed at high resolution that the intended tetrahedral cage was formed, though several flipped amino acid side chain rotamers resulted in an interface that deviates from the precise hydrogen-bonding pattern that was intended. A structure of the other designed cage showed that, under the conditions where crystals were obtained, a noncage structure was formed wherein a porous 3D protein network in space group I21 3 is generated by an off-target twofold homomeric interface. These results illustrate some of the ongoing challenges of developing computational methods for polar interface design, and add two potentially valuable new entries to the growing list of engineered protein materials for downstream applications.
© 2019 The Protein Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computational biology; nanotechnology; protein assembly; protein cages; protein crystallography; protein design

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31840320      PMCID: PMC7096701          DOI: 10.1002/pro.3802

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  38 in total

1.  Optimal description of a protein structure in terms of multiple groups undergoing TLS motion.

Authors:  Jay Painter; Ethan A Merritt
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2006-03-18

2.  XDS.

Authors:  Wolfgang Kabsch
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2010-01-22

3.  Structure of a designed tetrahedral protein assembly variant engineered to have improved soluble expression.

Authors:  Jacob B Bale; Rachel U Park; Yuxi Liu; Shane Gonen; Tamir Gonen; Duilio Cascio; Neil P King; Todd O Yeates; David Baker
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Near-atomic cryo-EM imaging of a small protein displayed on a designed scaffolding system.

Authors:  Yuxi Liu; Shane Gonen; Tamir Gonen; Todd O Yeates
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Design and structure of two new protein cages illustrate successes and ongoing challenges in protein engineering.

Authors:  Kevin A Cannon; Rachel U Park; Scott E Boyken; Una Nattermann; Sue Yi; David Baker; Neil P King; Todd O Yeates
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Evolution of a designed protein assembly encapsulating its own RNA genome.

Authors:  Gabriel L Butterfield; Marc J Lajoie; Heather H Gustafson; Drew L Sellers; Una Nattermann; Daniel Ellis; Jacob B Bale; Sharon Ke; Garreck H Lenz; Angelica Yehdego; Rashmi Ravichandran; Suzie H Pun; Neil P King; David Baker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  De novo design of tunable, pH-driven conformational changes.

Authors:  Scott E Boyken; Mark A Benhaim; Florian Busch; Mengxuan Jia; Matthew J Bick; Heejun Choi; Jason C Klima; Zibo Chen; Carl Walkey; Alexander Mileant; Aniruddha Sahasrabuddhe; Kathy Y Wei; Edgar A Hodge; Sarah Byron; Alfredo Quijano-Rubio; Banumathi Sankaran; Neil P King; Jennifer Lippincott-Schwartz; Vicki H Wysocki; Kelly K Lee; David Baker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Structure of a designed protein cage that self-assembles into a highly porous cube.

Authors:  Yen-Ting Lai; Eamonn Reading; Greg L Hura; Kuang-Lei Tsai; Arthur Laganowsky; Francisco J Asturias; John A Tainer; Carol V Robinson; Todd O Yeates
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 24.427

9.  Design of a hyperstable 60-subunit protein dodecahedron. [corrected].

Authors:  Yang Hsia; Jacob B Bale; Shane Gonen; Dan Shi; William Sheffler; Kimberly K Fong; Una Nattermann; Chunfu Xu; Po-Ssu Huang; Rashmi Ravichandran; Sue Yi; Trisha N Davis; Tamir Gonen; Neil P King; David Baker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Induction of Potent Neutralizing Antibody Responses by a Designed Protein Nanoparticle Vaccine for Respiratory Syncytial Virus.

Authors:  Jessica Marcandalli; Brooke Fiala; Sebastian Ols; Michela Perotti; Willem de van der Schueren; Joost Snijder; Edgar Hodge; Mark Benhaim; Rashmi Ravichandran; Lauren Carter; Will Sheffler; Livia Brunner; Maria Lawrenz; Patrice Dubois; Antonio Lanzavecchia; Federica Sallusto; Kelly K Lee; David Veesler; Colin E Correnti; Lance J Stewart; David Baker; Karin Loré; Laurent Perez; Neil P King
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  8 in total

1.  Design and structure of two new protein cages illustrate successes and ongoing challenges in protein engineering.

Authors:  Kevin A Cannon; Rachel U Park; Scott E Boyken; Una Nattermann; Sue Yi; David Baker; Neil P King; Todd O Yeates
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 2.  Protein Assembly by Design.

Authors:  Jie Zhu; Nicole Avakyan; Albert Kakkis; Alexander M Hoffnagle; Kenneth Han; Yiying Li; Zhiyin Zhang; Tae Su Choi; Youjeong Na; Chung-Jui Yu; F Akif Tezcan
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 72.087

Review 3.  Engineering spatiotemporal organization and dynamics in synthetic cells.

Authors:  Alessandro Groaz; Hossein Moghimianavval; Franco Tavella; Tobias W Giessen; Anthony G Vecchiarelli; Qiong Yang; Allen P Liu
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2020-11-21

Review 4.  Artificial Organelles: Towards Adding or Restoring Intracellular Activity.

Authors:  Roy A J F Oerlemans; Suzanne B P E Timmermans; Jan C M van Hest
Journal:  Chembiochem       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.164

5.  A fragment-based protein interface design algorithm for symmetric assemblies.

Authors:  Joshua Laniado; Kyle Meador; Todd O Yeates
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 1.952

6.  Computational Design of Single-Peptide Nanocages with Nanoparticle Templating.

Authors:  José A Villegas; Nairiti J Sinha; Naozumi Teramoto; Christopher D Von Bargen; Darrin J Pochan; Jeffery G Saven
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 4.411

7.  De novo designed protein inhibitors of amyloid aggregation and seeding.

Authors:  Kevin A Murray; Carolyn J Hu; Sarah L Griner; Hope Pan; Jeannette T Bowler; Romany Abskharon; Gregory M Rosenberg; Xinyi Cheng; Paul M Seidler; David S Eisenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 12.779

Review 8.  Connectability of protein cages.

Authors:  Karolina Majsterkiewicz; Yusuke Azuma; Jonathan G Heddle
Journal:  Nanoscale Adv       Date:  2020-05-18
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.