Literature DB >> 8071137

On the role of the olivocochlear bundle in hearing: a case study.

B Scharf1, J Magnan, L Collet, E Ulmer, A Chays.   

Abstract

A young patient with normal pure-tone thresholds in both ears underwent a unilateral vestibular neurotomy in January 1992 to relieve severe vertigo ascribed to Ménière's disease. Evidence is provided that the whole vestibular nerve including the olivocochlear bundle (OCB) was sectioned. Just prior to the surgery, the patient was examined in several psychoacoustic tests involving mainly signal detection and selective attention. Over the next 20 months, he was reexamined in those same tests. The patient's ability to detect expected tones in the quiet (including audiograms) or in noise was the same as before the surgery. The one change was a marked improvement in the detection of unexpected signals in noise, which appears to reflect impaired selective attention. During those 20 months, new tests were also performed on discrimination, loudness, pitch, lateralization, and temporary threshold shift. On these tests, the only differences between the operated and unoperated ears concerned binaural diplacusis and loudness adaptation close to threshold, but these differences may well have been present prior to the surgery. Except with respect to what is probably selective attention, we uncovered no other clear role for the OCB in hearing. This outcome agrees with limited measurements on other patients, with their subjective reports, and with a number of published neurophysiological observations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8071137     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(94)90051-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  17 in total

1.  Temporal masking in electric hearing.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Hongbin Chen; Shilong Han
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-12

2.  [Auditory processing disorders : Consensus statement by the German Society for Phoniatry and Paedaudiology].

Authors:  A Nickisch; M Gross; R Schönweiler; V Uttenweiler; A am Zehnhoff-Dinnesen; R Berger; H J Radü; M Ptok
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Cochlear efferent feedback balances interaural sensitivity.

Authors:  Keith N Darrow; Stéphane F Maison; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-11-19       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  The efferent-mediated suppression of otoacoustic emissions in awake guinea pigs and its reversible blockage by gentamicin.

Authors:  P Avan; J P Erre; D L da Costa; J M Aran; J Popelár
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Long-term effects of sectioning the olivocochlear bundle in neonatal cats.

Authors:  E J Walsh; J McGee; S L McFadden; M C Liberman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Exploring the role of feedback-based auditory reflexes in forward masking by schroeder-phase complexes.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Jordan A Beim; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-10-22

7.  Evaluation of Contralateral Suppression of Otoacoustic Emissions in Bharatanatyam Dancers and Non-Dancers.

Authors:  Joel Joseph; Ankita Suman; G K Jayasree; Prashanth Prabhu
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.017

8.  Auditory attentional filter in the absence of masking noise.

Authors:  Elan Selvi Anandan; Ruby Husain; Kumar Seluakumaran
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Central masking with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Payton Lin; Thomas Lu; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Efferent feedback minimizes cochlear neuropathy from moderate noise exposure.

Authors:  Stéphane F Maison; Hajime Usubuchi; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.