Literature DB >> 9141090

Difference in cochlear efferent activity between musicians and non-musicians.

C Micheyl1, S Khalfa, X Perrot, L Collet.   

Abstract

The present study aimed to confirm and extend the finding, suggested by the results of a previous study, of different auditory neural efferent functioning in musicians compared with non-musicians. The activity of the medial olivocochlear bundle (MOCB), an auditory efferent subsystem, was measured through the contralaterally induced attenuation of the amplitude of evoked otoacoustic emissions (EOAEs) in two groups, one of musicians and one of non-musicians, paired for age and sex. The results indicated a statistically significant difference between the two groups, with the musicians showing greater amplitude reduction upon contralateral noise stimulation than non-musicians (U-test, U = 204, p < 0.025, n = 32). These results indicate greater MOCB activity in musicians than in non-musicians. The possible origins and implications of this finding are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9141090     DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199703030-00046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  9 in total

1.  Enhanced brainstem encoding predicts musicians' perceptual advantages with pitch.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  Stability of the medial olivocochlear reflex as measured by distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Srikanta K Mishra; Carolina Abdala
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Evaluation of Contralateral Suppression of Otoacoustic Emissions in Bharatanatyam Dancers and Non-Dancers.

Authors:  Joel Joseph; Ankita Suman; G K Jayasree; Prashanth Prabhu
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.017

4.  Effects of reverberation on brainstem representation of speech in musicians and non-musicians.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Neural Encoding of Speech and Music: Implications for Hearing Speech in Noise.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2011-05-01

Review 6.  The nicotinic receptor of cochlear hair cells: a possible pharmacotherapeutic target?

Authors:  Ana Belén Elgoyhen; Eleonora Katz; Paul A Fuchs
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 5.858

Review 7.  Unraveling the Biology of Auditory Learning: A Cognitive-Sensorimotor-Reward Framework.

Authors:  Nina Kraus; Travis White-Schwoch
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  The Medial Olivocochlear Reflex Is Unlikely to Play a Role in Listening Difficulties in Children.

Authors:  Sriram Boothalingam; Chris Allan; Prudence Allen; David W Purcell
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Assessment of rock musician's efferent system functioning using contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Prawin Kumar; Vibhu Grover; Sam Publius A; Himanshu Kumar Sanju; Sachchidanand Sinha
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-12-23
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.