Literature DB >> 30508870

Using the Probability of Cesarean from a Validated Cesarean Prediction Calculator to Predict Labor Length and Morbidity.

Rebecca F Hamm1, Katheryne L Downes1, Sindhu K Srinivas1, Lisa D Levine1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if increasing predicted risk of cesarean was associated with longer labor length and increased morbidity among women undergoing induction with an unfavorable cervix. STUDY
DESIGN: Using a publically available database, we evaluated whether a previously validated prediction model for cesarean delivery after induction was associated with labor length, maternal morbidity (third-/fourth-degree lacerations, endometritis, blood transfusion, wound infection, venous thromboembolism, hysterectomy, intensive care unit admission, and death), and neonatal morbidity (blood transfusion, encephalopathy, intraventricular hemorrhage, severe respiratory distress syndrome, necrotizing enterocolitis, and sepsis). Full-term (≥37 weeks) singleton gestations with intact membranes and an unfavorable cervix (Bishop score ≤6 and dilation ≤2 cm) undergoing induction of labor were included.
RESULTS: A total of 8,466 women met the inclusion criteria. Each category increase in cesarean probability (<20, 20-39.9, 40-59.9, ≥60%) was associated with an increase in labor length (9.6, 10.8, 11.7, and 11.9 hours, respectively; p < 0.001). With increasing predicted probability of cesarean there, was also a significant increase in maternal morbidity with each category (2.6, 4.7, 5.1, 6.1%; p = 0.001) and increase in neonatal morbidity (0.9, 1.5, 2, 2.2%; p = 0.002).
CONCLUSION: Using a validated prediction model for cesarean delivery among women induced with an unfavorable cervix, increasing predicted probability of cesarean is associated with longer labor length and increased maternal and neonatal morbidity. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30508870      PMCID: PMC6491246          DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1675625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Perinatol        ISSN: 0735-1631            Impact factor:   1.862


  11 in total

1.  Maternal and fetal risks associated with prolonged latent phase of labour.

Authors:  J Maghoma; E J Buchmann
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 2.  Predictors of induction success.

Authors:  William A Grobman
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.300

3.  Association Between Prepregnancy Body Mass Index and Severe Maternal Morbidity.

Authors:  Sarka Lisonkova; Giulia M Muraca; Jayson Potts; Jessica Liauw; Wee-Shian Chan; Amanda Skoll; Kenneth I Lim
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Frequency of and factors associated with severe maternal morbidity.

Authors:  William A Grobman; Jennifer L Bailit; Madeline Murguia Rice; Ronald J Wapner; Uma M Reddy; Michael W Varner; John M Thorp; Kenneth J Leveno; Steve N Caritis; Jay D Iams; Alan T Tita; George Saade; Yoram Sorokin; Dwight J Rouse; Sean C Blackwell; Jorge E Tolosa; J Peter Van Dorsten
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  A validated calculator to estimate risk of cesarean after an induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix.

Authors:  Lisa D Levine; Katheryne L Downes; Samuel Parry; Michal A Elovitz; Mary D Sammel; Sindhu K Srinivas
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Failed labor induction: toward an objective diagnosis.

Authors:  Dwight J Rouse; Steven J Weiner; Steven L Bloom; Michael W Varner; Catherine Y Spong; Susan M Ramin; Steve N Caritis; William A Grobman; Yoram Sorokin; Anthony Sciscione; Marshall W Carpenter; Brian M Mercer; John M Thorp; Fergal D Malone; Margaret Harper; Jay D Iams; Garland D Anderson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Length of the first stage of labor and associated perinatal outcomes in nulliparous women.

Authors:  Yvonne W Cheng; Brian L Shaffer; Allison S Bryant; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Active-phase labor arrest: a randomized trial of chorioamnion management.

Authors:  D J Rouse; C McCullough; A L Wren; J Owen; J C Hauth
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Predicting Cesarean Delivery After Induction of Labor Among Nulliparous Women at Term.

Authors:  Mary Catherine Tolcher; Michael R Holbert; Amy L Weaver; Michaela E McGree; Janet E Olson; Sherif A El-Nashar; Abimbola O Famuyide; Brian C Brost
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Preventing the first cesarean delivery: summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Workshop.

Authors:  Catherine Y Spong; Vincenzo Berghella; Katharine D Wenstrom; Brian M Mercer; George R Saade
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  3 in total

1.  Standardized Cesarean Risk Counseling with Induction: Impact on Racial Disparities in Birth Satisfaction.

Authors:  Rebecca F Hamm; Sindhu K Srinivas; Jennifer Mccoy; Knashawn H Morales; Lisa D Levine
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Neighborhood deprivation increases the risk of Post-induction cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Jessica R Meeker; Heather H Burris; Ray Bai; Lisa D Levine; Mary Regina Boland
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 7.942

3.  Maternal Morbidity and Birth Satisfaction After Implementation of a Validated Calculator to Predict Cesarean Delivery During Labor Induction.

Authors:  Rebecca F Hamm; Jennifer McCoy; Amal Oladuja; Hilary R Bogner; Michal A Elovitz; Knashawn H Morales; Sindhu K Srinivas; Lisa D Levine
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-11-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.