OBJECTIVE: To determine if increasing predicted risk of cesarean was associated with longer labor length and increased morbidity among women undergoing induction with an unfavorable cervix. STUDY DESIGN: Using a publically available database, we evaluated whether a previously validated prediction model for cesarean delivery after induction was associated with labor length, maternal morbidity (third-/fourth-degree lacerations, endometritis, blood transfusion, wound infection, venous thromboembolism, hysterectomy, intensive care unit admission, and death), and neonatal morbidity (blood transfusion, encephalopathy, intraventricular hemorrhage, severe respiratory distress syndrome, necrotizing enterocolitis, and sepsis). Full-term (≥37 weeks) singleton gestations with intact membranes and an unfavorable cervix (Bishop score ≤6 and dilation ≤2 cm) undergoing induction of labor were included. RESULTS: A total of 8,466 women met the inclusion criteria. Each category increase in cesarean probability (<20, 20-39.9, 40-59.9, ≥60%) was associated with an increase in labor length (9.6, 10.8, 11.7, and 11.9 hours, respectively; p < 0.001). With increasing predicted probability of cesarean there, was also a significant increase in maternal morbidity with each category (2.6, 4.7, 5.1, 6.1%; p = 0.001) and increase in neonatal morbidity (0.9, 1.5, 2, 2.2%; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Using a validated prediction model for cesarean delivery among women induced with an unfavorable cervix, increasing predicted probability of cesarean is associated with longer labor length and increased maternal and neonatal morbidity. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if increasing predicted risk of cesarean was associated with longer labor length and increased morbidity among women undergoing induction with an unfavorable cervix. STUDY DESIGN: Using a publically available database, we evaluated whether a previously validated prediction model for cesarean delivery after induction was associated with labor length, maternal morbidity (third-/fourth-degree lacerations, endometritis, blood transfusion, wound infection, venous thromboembolism, hysterectomy, intensive care unit admission, and death), and neonatal morbidity (blood transfusion, encephalopathy, intraventricular hemorrhage, severe respiratory distress syndrome, necrotizing enterocolitis, and sepsis). Full-term (≥37 weeks) singleton gestations with intact membranes and an unfavorable cervix (Bishop score ≤6 and dilation ≤2 cm) undergoing induction of labor were included. RESULTS: A total of 8,466 women met the inclusion criteria. Each category increase in cesarean probability (<20, 20-39.9, 40-59.9, ≥60%) was associated with an increase in labor length (9.6, 10.8, 11.7, and 11.9 hours, respectively; p < 0.001). With increasing predicted probability of cesarean there, was also a significant increase in maternal morbidity with each category (2.6, 4.7, 5.1, 6.1%; p = 0.001) and increase in neonatal morbidity (0.9, 1.5, 2, 2.2%; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Using a validated prediction model for cesarean delivery among women induced with an unfavorable cervix, increasing predicted probability of cesarean is associated with longer labor length and increased maternal and neonatal morbidity. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.
Authors: William A Grobman; Jennifer L Bailit; Madeline Murguia Rice; Ronald J Wapner; Uma M Reddy; Michael W Varner; John M Thorp; Kenneth J Leveno; Steve N Caritis; Jay D Iams; Alan T Tita; George Saade; Yoram Sorokin; Dwight J Rouse; Sean C Blackwell; Jorge E Tolosa; J Peter Van Dorsten Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Lisa D Levine; Katheryne L Downes; Samuel Parry; Michal A Elovitz; Mary D Sammel; Sindhu K Srinivas Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2017-12-07 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Dwight J Rouse; Steven J Weiner; Steven L Bloom; Michael W Varner; Catherine Y Spong; Susan M Ramin; Steve N Caritis; William A Grobman; Yoram Sorokin; Anthony Sciscione; Marshall W Carpenter; Brian M Mercer; John M Thorp; Fergal D Malone; Margaret Harper; Jay D Iams; Garland D Anderson Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Mary Catherine Tolcher; Michael R Holbert; Amy L Weaver; Michaela E McGree; Janet E Olson; Sherif A El-Nashar; Abimbola O Famuyide; Brian C Brost Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Catherine Y Spong; Vincenzo Berghella; Katharine D Wenstrom; Brian M Mercer; George R Saade Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Rebecca F Hamm; Sindhu K Srinivas; Jennifer Mccoy; Knashawn H Morales; Lisa D Levine Journal: Am J Perinatol Date: 2021-11-16 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Jessica R Meeker; Heather H Burris; Ray Bai; Lisa D Levine; Mary Regina Boland Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2022-01-12 Impact factor: 7.942
Authors: Rebecca F Hamm; Jennifer McCoy; Amal Oladuja; Hilary R Bogner; Michal A Elovitz; Knashawn H Morales; Sindhu K Srinivas; Lisa D Levine Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2020-11-02