Literature DB >> 34784614

Standardized Cesarean Risk Counseling with Induction: Impact on Racial Disparities in Birth Satisfaction.

Rebecca F Hamm1,2, Sindhu K Srinivas1,2, Jennifer Mccoy1, Knashawn H Morales3, Lisa D Levine1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our prior work demonstrated decreased birth satisfaction for Black women undergoing labor induction. We aimed to determine if implementation of standardized counseling around calculated cesarean risk during labor induction could reduce racial disparities in birth satisfaction. STUDY
DESIGN: We implemented use of a validated calculator that provides an individual cesarean risk score for women undergoing induction into routine care. This prospective cohort study compared satisfaction surveys for 6 months prior to implementation (preperiod: January 2018-June 2018) to 1 year after (postperiod: July 2018-June 2019). Women with full-term (≥37 weeks) singleton gestations with intact membranes and an unfavorable cervix undergoing induction were included. In the postperiod, providers counseled patients on individual cesarean risk at the beginning of induction using standardized scripts. This information was incorporated into care at patient-provider discretion. The validated 10-question Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R) subdivided into three domains was administered throughout the study. Patients were determined to be "satisfied" or "unsatisfied" if total BSS-R score was above or below the median, respectively. In multivariable analysis, interaction terms evaluated the differential impact of the calculator on birth satisfaction by race (Black vs. non-Black women).
RESULTS: A total of 1,008 of 1,236 (81.6%) eligible women completed the BSS-R (preperiod: 330 [79.7%] versus postperiod: 678 [82.5%], p = 0.23), 63.8% of whom self-identified as Black. In the pre-period, Black women were 50% less likely to be satisfied than non-Black women, even when controlling for differences in parity (Black: 39.0% satisfied vs. non-Black: 53.9%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.30-0.79). In the postperiod, there was no difference in satisfaction by race (Black: 43.7% satisfied vs. non-Black: 44.0%, aOR = 0.97. 95% CI: 0.71-1.33). Therefore, disparities in birth satisfaction were no longer present at postimplementation (interaction p = 0.03).
CONCLUSION: Implementation of standardized counseling with a validated calculator to predict cesarean risk after labor induction is associated with a decrease in racial disparities in birth satisfaction. KEY POINTS: · Preintervention, Black women were less likely to have above-median birth satisfaction.. · We implemented standardized counseling around cesarean risk with labor induction.. · Implementation was associated with reduced racial disparities in birth satisfaction scores.. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34784614      PMCID: PMC9119147          DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1739468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Perinatol        ISSN: 0735-1631            Impact factor:   1.862


  21 in total

1.  The influence of the systematic birth preparation program on childbirth satisfaction.

Authors:  Aysu Akca; Aytul Corbacioglu Esmer; Eser Sefik Ozyurek; Arife Aydin; Nazli Korkmaz; Husnu Gorgen; Ozgur Akbayir
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 2.344

2.  Commentary: Race and Ethnicity in Biomedical Research - Classifications, Challenges, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Dame Idossa; Narjust Duma; Katerina Chekhovskiy; Ronald Go; Sikander Ailawadhi
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 1.847

Review 3.  Nonconscious processes and health.

Authors:  Paschal Sheeran; Peter M Gollwitzer; John A Bargh
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 4.267

4.  Measurement and structural invariance of the US version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R) in a large sample.

Authors:  Colin R Martin; Caroline J Hollins Martin; Ekaterina Burduli; Celestina Barbosa-Leiker; Colleen Donovan-Batson; Susan E Fleming
Journal:  Women Birth       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.172

5.  A validated calculator to estimate risk of cesarean after an induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix.

Authors:  Lisa D Levine; Katheryne L Downes; Samuel Parry; Michal A Elovitz; Mary D Sammel; Sindhu K Srinivas
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Women's perceptions, expectations and satisfaction with induced labour--a questionnaire-based study.

Authors:  Ashalatha Shetty; Rhona Burt; Pat Rice; Allan Templeton
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 2.435

7.  Development and psychometric properties of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R).

Authors:  Caroline J Hollins Martin; Colin R Martin
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 2.372

Review 8.  Quality of Care and Disparities in Obstetrics.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Howell; Jennifer Zeitlin
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 9.  Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review.

Authors:  Chloë FitzGerald; Samia Hurst
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.652

10.  Risk factors and racial disparities related to low maternal birth satisfaction with labor induction: a prospective, cohort study.

Authors:  Rebecca F Hamm; Sindhu K Srinivas; Lisa D Levine
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.