Literature DB >> 26444107

Predicting Cesarean Delivery After Induction of Labor Among Nulliparous Women at Term.

Mary Catherine Tolcher1, Michael R Holbert, Amy L Weaver, Michaela E McGree, Janet E Olson, Sherif A El-Nashar, Abimbola O Famuyide, Brian C Brost.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify independent risk factors for cesarean delivery after induction of labor and to develop a nomogram for predicting cesarean delivery among nulliparous women undergoing induction of labor at term.
METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study including nulliparous women with singleton, term (37 0/7 weeks of gestation or greater), cephalic pregnancies undergoing induction of labor from July 1, 2006, through May 31, 2012, at a tertiary care academic center. Inductions were identified using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision codes. Demographic, delivery, and outcome data were abstracted manually from the medical record. Women with a contraindication to vaginal delivery (malpresentation, abnormal placentation, prior myomectomy) were excluded. Independent risk factors for cesarean delivery were identified using logistic regression.
RESULTS: During the study period, there were 785 nulliparous inductions that met study criteria; 231 (29.4%) underwent cesarean delivery. Independent risk factors associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery included older maternal age, shorter maternal height, greater body mass index, greater weight gain during pregnancy, older gestational age, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and initial cervical dilation less than 3 cm. A nomogram was constructed based on the final model with a bias-corrected c-index of 0.709 (95% confidence interval 0.671-0.750).
CONCLUSION: We identified independent risk factors that can be used to predict cesarean delivery among nulliparous women undergoing induction of labor at term. If validated in other populations, the nomogram could be useful for individualized counseling of women with a combination of identifiable antepartum risk factors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26444107      PMCID: PMC4618703          DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  14 in total

1.  Using the Probability of Cesarean from a Validated Cesarean Prediction Calculator to Predict Labor Length and Morbidity.

Authors:  Rebecca F Hamm; Katheryne L Downes; Sindhu K Srinivas; Lisa D Levine
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for Cesarean Delivery After Labor Induction.

Authors:  Valery A Danilack; Jennifer A Hutcheon; Elizabeth W Triche; David D Dore; Janet H Muri; Maureen G Phipps; David A Savitz
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Clinical Impact of a Restrictive Labor Induction Approval Process.

Authors:  Mary Catherine Tolcher; Alexis N Hokenstad; Amy L Weaver; Michaela E McGree; Carl H Rose; Abimbola O Famuyide; Brian C Brost
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 2.729

4.  Term induction of labour in nulliparous women: When to draw the line?

Authors:  Jill M Mitchell; Patrick Dicker; Grace Madigan; Sarah Nicholson; Suzanne Smyth; Fionnuala M Breathnach
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X       Date:  2022-04-16

5.  Application of a Nomogram for Predicting the Risk of Subchorionic Hematoma in Early Pregnancy With In Vitro Fertilization-Embryo Transfer/Frozen Embryo Transfer.

Authors:  Ma Yue; Linna Ma; Yurong Cao; Jun Zhai
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 5.555

6.  Clinical predictive factors for vaginal delivery following induction of labour among pregnant women in Jordan.

Authors:  Rawan A Obeidat; Mahmoud Almaaitah; Abeer Ben-Sadon; Dina Istaiti; Hasan Rawashdeh; Shereen Hamadneh; Hanan Hammouri; Adel Bataineh
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Is there an increased risk of cesarean section in obese women after induction of labor? A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jenny Bjorklund; Eva Wiberg-Itzel; Tove Wallstrom
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The Role of Oxytocin in Primary Cesarean Birth Among Low-Risk Women.

Authors:  Rebecca R S Clark; Nicole Warren; Kenneth M Shermock; Nancy Perrin; Eileen Lake; Phyllis W Sharps
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 2.388

9.  Customized Probability of Vaginal Delivery With Induction of Labor and Expectant Management in Nulliparous Women at 39 Weeks of Gestation.

Authors:  Robert M Silver; Madeline Murguia Rice; William A Grobman; Uma M Reddy; Alan T N Tita; Gail Mallett; Kim Hill; Elizabeth A Thom; Yasser Y El-Sayed; Ronald J Wapner; Dwight J Rouse; George R Saade; John M Thorp; Suneet P Chauhan; Edward K Chien; Brian M Casey; Ronald S Gibbs; Sindhu K Srinivas; Geeta K Swamy; Hyagriv N Simhan; George A Macones
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 7.623

10.  Nomogram predicting cesarean delivery undergoing induction of labor among high-risk nulliparous women at term: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Hang Zhou; Ning Gu; Yan Yang; Zhiqun Wang; Yali Hu; Yimin Dai
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.