Literature DB >> 12521720

Maternal and fetal risks associated with prolonged latent phase of labour.

J Maghoma1, E J Buchmann.   

Abstract

A pregnancy cohort study was undertaken to assess the fetal, maternal and obstetric risks associated with the prolonged latent phase of labour. One hundred and fifty cases (latent phase >8 hours) were compared with 100 controls (latent phase <8 hours). Data were collected from hospital records. There were more nulliparas in the case group (73% vs. 39%; P<0.0001). Cases required oxytocin augmentation (62% vs. 17%; P<0.0001) and caesarean section (29% vs. 6%; P<0.0001) more frequently than controls. Thick meconium staining of the liquor was more frequent in cases (15% vs. 5%; P<0.05), as were 5-minute Apgar scores less than 7 (17% vs. 3%; P<0.001) and admission to the neonatal unit (22% vs. 1%; P<0.0001). Prolonged latent phase is associated with increased risks for obstetric intervention and poor fetal outcome. The optimal management of prolonged latent phase is still unknown and requires further study by means of randomised controlled trials.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12521720     DOI: 10.1080/01443610120101637

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0144-3615            Impact factor:   1.246


  17 in total

1.  Using the Probability of Cesarean from a Validated Cesarean Prediction Calculator to Predict Labor Length and Morbidity.

Authors:  Rebecca F Hamm; Katheryne L Downes; Sindhu K Srinivas; Lisa D Levine
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  The transition from latent to active labor and adverse obstetrical outcomes.

Authors:  Joshua I Rosenbloom; Candice L Woolfolk; Leping Wan; Molly J Stout; Methodius G Tuuli; George A Macones; Alison G Cahill
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Defining failed induction of labor.

Authors:  William A Grobman; Jennifer Bailit; Yinglei Lai; Uma M Reddy; Ronald J Wapner; Michael W Varner; John M Thorp; Kenneth J Leveno; Steve N Caritis; Mona Prasad; Alan T N Tita; George Saade; Yoram Sorokin; Dwight J Rouse; Sean C Blackwell; Jorge E Tolosa
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-11-11       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Comparison between amniotomy, oxytocin or both for augmentation of labor in prolonged latent phase: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Zohar Nachum; Gali Garmi; Yfat Kadan; Noah Zafran; Eliezer Shalev; Raed Salim
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2010-11-07       Impact factor: 5.211

Review 5.  Effectiveness and Safety of Camylofin in Augmentation of Labor: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Nandita Palshetkar; Ameya Purandare; Hemant Mehta; Rohan Palshetkar
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2020-08-11

6.  Induction, labor length and mode of delivery: the impact on preeclampsia-related adverse maternal outcomes.

Authors:  L D Levine; M A Elovitz; M Limaye; M D Sammel; S K Srinivas
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 2.521

7.  Impact of physical activity during pregnancy on obstetric outcomes in obese women.

Authors:  Rachel A Tinius; Alison G Cahill; W Todd Cade
Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 1.637

8.  Evaluating the impact of a standardized induction protocol to reduce adverse perinatal outcomes: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Lisa D Levine; Katheryne L Downes; Rebecca F Hamm; Sindhu K Srinivas
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2019-10-24

9.  Predictors of labor abnormalities in university hospital: unmatched case control study.

Authors:  Wayu Abraham; Yifru Berhan
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-08-03       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Women's perception of pre-hospital labour duration and obstetrical outcomes; a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Patricia A Janssen; Sandra Weissinger
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.