Literature DB >> 21252738

Failed labor induction: toward an objective diagnosis.

Dwight J Rouse1, Steven J Weiner, Steven L Bloom, Michael W Varner, Catherine Y Spong, Susan M Ramin, Steve N Caritis, William A Grobman, Yoram Sorokin, Anthony Sciscione, Marshall W Carpenter, Brian M Mercer, John M Thorp, Fergal D Malone, Margaret Harper, Jay D Iams, Garland D Anderson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate maternal and perinatal outcomes in women undergoing labor induction with an unfavorable cervix according to duration of oxytocin administration in the latent phase of labor after ruptured membranes.
METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of a randomized multicenter trial in which all cervical examinations from admission were recorded. INCLUSION CRITERIA: nulliparas at or beyond 36 weeks of gestation undergoing induction with a cervix of 2 cm or less dilated and less than completely effaced. The latent phase of labor was defined as ending at a cervical dilation of 4 cm and effacement of at least 90%, or at a cervical dilation of 5 cm regardless of effacement.
RESULTS: A total of 1,347 women were analyzed. The overall vaginal delivery rate was 63.2%. Most women had exited the latent phase after 6 hours of oxytocin and membrane rupture (n=939; 69.7%); only 5% remained in the latent phase after 12 hours. The longer the latent phase, the lower the vaginal delivery rate. Even so, 39.4% of the 71 women who remained in the latent phase after 12 hours of oxytocin and membrane rupture were delivered vaginally. Chorioamnionitis, endometritis, or both, and uterine atony were the only maternal adverse outcomes related to latent-phase duration: adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) of 1.12 (1.07, 1.17) and 1.13 (1.06, 1.19), respectively, for each additional hour. Neonatal outcomes were not related to latent-phase duration.
CONCLUSION: Almost 40% of the women who remained in the latent phase after 12 hours of oxytocin and membrane rupture were delivered vaginally. Therefore, it is reasonable to avoid deeming labor induction a failure in the latent phase until oxytocin has been administered for at least 12 hours after membrane rupture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21252738      PMCID: PMC3924571          DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318207887a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  5 in total

1.  Criteria for failed labor induction: prospective evaluation of a standardized protocol.

Authors:  D J Rouse; J Owen; J C Hauth
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Labor induction and the risk of a cesarean delivery among nulliparous women at term.

Authors:  Deborah B Ehrenthal; Xiaozhang Jiang; Donna M Strobino
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  When has an induction failed?

Authors:  Charla E Simon; William A Grobman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Fetal pulse oximetry and cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Steven L Bloom; Catherine Y Spong; Elizabeth Thom; Michael W Varner; Dwight J Rouse; Sandy Weininger; Susan M Ramin; Steve N Caritis; Alan Peaceman; Yoram Sorokin; Anthony Sciscione; Marshall Carpenter; Brian Mercer; John Thorp; Fergal Malone; Margaret Harper; Jay Iams; Garland Anderson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-11-23       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Duration of labor induction in nulliparous women at term: how long is long enough?

Authors:  Sean C Blackwell; Jerrie Refuerzo; Rati Chadha; Jacques Samson
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.862

  5 in total
  20 in total

1.  Using the Probability of Cesarean from a Validated Cesarean Prediction Calculator to Predict Labor Length and Morbidity.

Authors:  Rebecca F Hamm; Katheryne L Downes; Sindhu K Srinivas; Lisa D Levine
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Cervical Evaluation: From Ancient Medicine to Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Helen Feltovich
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Defining failed induction of labor.

Authors:  William A Grobman; Jennifer Bailit; Yinglei Lai; Uma M Reddy; Ronald J Wapner; Michael W Varner; John M Thorp; Kenneth J Leveno; Steve N Caritis; Mona Prasad; Alan T N Tita; George Saade; Yoram Sorokin; Dwight J Rouse; Sean C Blackwell; Jorge E Tolosa
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-11-11       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Quantitative assessment of cervical softening during pregnancy in the Rhesus macaque with shear wave elasticity imaging.

Authors:  Ivan M Rosado-Mendez; Lindsey C Carlson; Kaitlin M Woo; Andrew P Santoso; Quinton W Guerrero; Mark L Palmeri; Helen Feltovich; Timothy J Hall
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 5.  The Renaissance of Transcervical Balloon Catheters for Cervical Ripening and Labour Induction.

Authors:  W Rath; S Kehl
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.915

6.  Induction of labor in a contemporary obstetric cohort.

Authors:  S Katherine Laughon; Jun Zhang; Jagteshwar Grewal; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Julie Beaver; Uma M Reddy
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Neighborhood deprivation increases the risk of Post-induction cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Jessica R Meeker; Heather H Burris; Ray Bai; Lisa D Levine; Mary Regina Boland
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 7.942

8.  Evaluating the impact of a standardized induction protocol to reduce adverse perinatal outcomes: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Lisa D Levine; Katheryne L Downes; Rebecca F Hamm; Sindhu K Srinivas
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2019-10-24

9.  Association Between Time of Day and the Decision for an Intrapartum Cesarean Delivery.

Authors:  Moeun Son; Yinglei Lai; Jennifer Bailit; Uma M Reddy; Ronald J Wapner; Michael W Varner; John M Thorp; Steve N Caritis; Mona Prasad; Alan T N Tita; George Saade; Yoram Sorokin; Dwight J Rouse; Sean C Blackwell; Jorge E Tolosa
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 7.623

10.  Preventing the first cesarean delivery: summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Workshop.

Authors:  Catherine Y Spong; Vincenzo Berghella; Katharine D Wenstrom; Brian M Mercer; George R Saade
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 7.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.