Literature DB >> 21385857

Consistency and precision of landmark identification in three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography scans.

Will Schlicher1, Ib Nielsen, John C Huang, Koutaro Maki, David C Hatcher, A J Miller.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to quantify the consistency and precision of locating three-dimensional (3D) anatomic landmarks. The hypotheses tested are that these landmarks have characteristic and variable error patterns associated with their type and location. The consistency and precision of nine orthodontists identifying 32 landmarks of 19 patients were quantified. The cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) data were acquired using a Hitachi CB MercuRay system. Prior to the study, all examiners were calibrated with respect to the definitions of the landmarks and on the use of the software program (Dolphin) for identifying the landmarks. In addition, a reference guide was provided that had the definitions and sample images of the landmarks. Data were collected in spreadsheets as x, y, and z co-ordinates and statistically analysed to determine the mean and standard deviation (SD). The mean location for a given landmark on a given patient served as the reference point. The mean of the distances from the reference point was used as the consistency, while the SD of this mean was used as a measure of precision. The error in the x, y, and z planes was calculated in order to determine the specific characteristics of each landmark. The consistency in landmark location and precision did not differ significantly among the nine examiners. Sella turcica was the most consistently (0.50 mm) and most precisely (0.23 mm) identified anatomic landmark. The most inconsistent landmark was porion-right (2.72 mm) and the most imprecise landmark was orbitale-right (1.81 mm). Due to the lack of even distribution of the errors, careful use of these landmarks for analysis purposes is needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21385857     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjq144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  24 in total

1.  A knowledge-based algorithm for automatic detection of cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images.

Authors:  Abhishek Gupta; Om Prakash Kharbanda; Viren Sardana; Rajiv Balachandran; Harish Kumar Sardana
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Reproducibility of CBCT image analysis: a clinical study on intrapersonal and interpersonal errors in bone structure determination.

Authors:  Sigmar Schnutenhaus; Michael Graf; Isabel Doering; Ralph G Luthardt; Heike Rudolph
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 1.852

3.  Computer-aided cephalometric landmark annotation for CBCT data.

Authors:  Marina Codari; Matteo Caffini; Gianluca M Tartaglia; Chiarella Sforza; Giuseppe Baselli
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Development and Validation of Novel Three-Dimensional Craniofacial Landmarks on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scans.

Authors:  Denise K Liberton; Payal Verma; Anthony Contratto; Janice S Lee
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.046

5.  Reliability of different three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks in cone-beam computed tomography : A systematic review.

Authors:  Alycia Sam; Kris Currie; Heesoo Oh; Carlos Flores-Mir; Manuel Lagravére-Vich
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  In vivo comparison of MRI- and CBCT-based 3D cephalometric analysis: beginning of a non-ionizing diagnostic era in craniomaxillofacial imaging?

Authors:  Alexander Juerchott; Christian Freudlsperger; Dorothea Weber; Johann M E Jende; Muhammad Abdullah Saleem; Sebastian Zingler; Christopher J Lux; Martin Bendszus; Sabine Heiland; Tim Hilgenfeld
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Reproducibility of the sella turcica landmark in three dimensions using a sella turcica-specific reference system.

Authors:  Pisha Pittayapat; Reinhilde Jacobs; Guillaume A Odri; Karla de Faria Vasconcelos; Guy Willems; Raphaël Olszewski
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2015-03-13

8.  Effect of changing the head position on accuracy of transverse measurements of the maxillofacial region made on cone beam computed tomography and conventional posterior-anterior cephalograms.

Authors:  Abbas Shokri; Amirfarhang Miresmaeili; Nasrin Farhadian; Sepideh Falah-Kooshki; Payam Amini; Najmeh Mollaie
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 2.419

9.  Landmark-based midsagittal plane analysis in patients with facial symmetry and asymmetry based on CBCT analysis tomography.

Authors:  Adrienn Dobai; Zsolt Markella; Tamás Vízkelety; Christian Fouquet; Adrienne Rosta; József Barabás
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 1.938

10.  Accuracy of three-dimensional photogrammetry and cone beam computed tomography based on linear measurements in patients with facial deformities.

Authors:  Zhenqi Zhao; Lizhe Xie; Dan Cao; Iman Izadikhah; Pengcheng Gao; Yang Zhao; Bin Yan
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 2.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.