Literature DB >> 30482674

Temperature increases by kilohertz frequency spinal cord stimulation.

Adantchede L Zannou1, Niranjan Khadka1, Dennis Q Truong1, Tianhe Zhang2, Rosana Esteller2, Brad Hershey2, Marom Bikson3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Kilohertz frequency spinal cord stimulation (kHz-SCS) deposits significantly more power in tissue compared to SCS at conventional frequencies, reflecting increased duty cycle (pulse compression). We hypothesize kHz-SCS increases local tissue temperature by joule heat, which may influence the clinical outcomes.
METHODS: To establish the role of tissue heating in KHZ-SCS, a decisive first step is to characterize the range of temperature changes expected during conventional and KHZ-SCS protocols. Fiber optic probes quantified temperature increases around an experimental SCS lead in a bath phantom. These data were used to verify a SCS lead heat-transfer model based on joule heat. Temperature increases were then predicted in a seven-compartment (soft tissue, vertebral bone, fat, intervertebral disc, meninges, spinal cord with nerve roots) geometric human spinal cord model under varied parameterization.
RESULTS: The experimentally constrained bio-heat model shows SCS waveform power (waveform RMS) determines tissue heating at the spinal cord and surrounding tissues. For example, we predict temperature increased at dorsal spinal cord of 0.18-1.72 °C during 3.5 mA peak 10 KHz stimulation with a 40-10-40 μs biphasic pulse pattern, 0.09-0.22 °C during 3.5 mA 1 KHz 100-100-100 μs stimulation, and less than 0.05 °C during 3.5 mA 50 Hz 200-100-200 μs stimulation. Notably, peak heating of the spinal cord and other tissues increases superlinearly with stimulation power and so are especially sensitive to incremental changes in SCS pulse amplitude or frequency (with associated pulse compression). Further supporting distinct SCS intervention strategies based on heating; the spatial profile of temperature changes is more uniform compared to electric fields, which suggests less sensitivity to lead position.
CONCLUSIONS: Tissue heating may impact short and long-term outcomes of KHZ-SCS, and even as an adjunct mechanism, suggests distinct strategies for lead position and programming optimization.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioheat modeling; FEM; High rate biphasic spinal cord stimulation; Mechanism; Safety; Temperature

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30482674      PMCID: PMC6301103          DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.10.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Stimul        ISSN: 1876-4754            Impact factor:   8.955


  64 in total

1.  A computer model of human thermoregulation for a wide range of environmental conditions: the passive system.

Authors:  D Fiala; K J Lomas; M Stohrer
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1999-11

Review 2.  Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols.

Authors:  Daniel R Merrill; Marom Bikson; John G R Jefferys
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  A tissue heat transfer model for relating dynamic skin temperature changes to physiological parameters.

Authors:  S B Wilson; V A Spence
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Effects of temperature on spontaneous bioelectric activity of cultured nerve cells.

Authors:  B H Gahwiler; A M Mamoon; W T Schlapfer; C A Tobias
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1972-05-26       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Numerical model for radio-frequency ablation of the endocardium and its experimental validation.

Authors:  S Labonté
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Modulation of activity and conduction in single dorsal column axons by kilohertz-frequency spinal cord stimulation.

Authors:  Nathan D Crosby; John J Janik; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Permeability of the blood-brain barrier depends on brain temperature.

Authors:  E A Kiyatkin; H S Sharma
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 8.  Activation of inspiratory muscles via spinal cord stimulation.

Authors:  Anthony F DiMarco; Krzysztof E Kowalski
Journal:  Respir Physiol Neurobiol       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 1.931

Review 9.  Central neural pathways for thermoregulation.

Authors:  Shaun F Morrison; Kazuhiro Nakamura
Journal:  Front Biosci (Landmark Ed)       Date:  2011-01-01

Review 10.  Conventional and Novel Spinal Stimulation Algorithms: Hypothetical Mechanisms of Action and Comments on Outcomes.

Authors:  Bengt Linderoth; Robert D Foreman
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2017-05-31
View more
  13 in total

1.  Electrophysiology equipment for reliable study of kHz electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Mohamad FallahRad; Adantchede Louis Zannou; Niranjan Khadka; Steven A Prescott; Stéphanie Ratté; Tianhe Zhang; Rosana Esteller; Brad Hershey; Marom Bikson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Spinal cord stimulation in chronic pain: evidence and theory for mechanisms of action.

Authors:  Jacob Caylor; Rajiv Reddy; Sopyda Yin; Christina Cui; Mingxiong Huang; Charles Huang; Rao Ramesh; Dewleen G Baker; Alan Simmons; Dmitri Souza; Samer Narouze; Ricardo Vallejo; Imanuel Lerman
Journal:  Bioelectron Med       Date:  2019-06-28

3.  Development and Clinical Validation of a Finite Element Method Model Mapping Focal Intracranial Cooling.

Authors:  Turner S Baker; Adantchede L Zannou; Danna Cruz; Niranjan Khadka; Christopher Kellner; Richard Tyc; Marom Bikson; Anthony Costa
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 4.528

4.  Electrochemical Skin Conductance Alterations during Spinal Cord Stimulation: An Experimental Study.

Authors:  Lisa Goudman; Nieke Vets; Julie Jansen; Ann De Smedt; Maxime Billot; Philippe Rigoard; Ann Cordenier; Sebastiaan Engelborghs; Aldo Scafoglieri; Maarten Moens
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  The Quasi-uniform assumption for Spinal Cord Stimulation translational research.

Authors:  Niranjan Khadka; Dennis Q Truong; Preston Williams; John H Martin; Marom Bikson
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  Neurocapillary-Modulation.

Authors:  Niranjan Khadka; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2020-12-19

7.  Limited Sensitivity of Hippocampal Synaptic Function or Network Oscillations to Unmodulated Kilohertz Electric Fields.

Authors:  Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Mark Jackson; Greg Kronberg; Tianhe Zhang; Rosana Esteller; Brad Hershey; Marom Bikson
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2020-12-16

Review 8.  A Call to Action Toward Optimizing the Electrical Dose Received by Neural Targets in Spinal Cord Stimulation Therapy for Neuropathic Pain.

Authors:  Krishnan Chakravarthy; Rajiv Reddy; Adnan Al-Kaisy; Thomas Yearwood; Jay Grider
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 2.832

9.  Failure of SCS MR-Conditional Modes Due to High Impedance: A Review of Literature and Case Series.

Authors:  Rohan Jotwani; Alaa Abd-Elsayed; Kristine Villegas; Ahmed Shakil; Amitabh Gulati; Dawood Sayed; Christopher Lam; Neel Mehta
Journal:  Pain Ther       Date:  2020-11-21

10.  Comparison of Spinal Cord Stimulation vs. Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation vs. Association of Both in Patients with Refractory Chronic Back and/or Lower Limb Neuropathic Pain: An International, Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Crossover Trial (BOOST-DRG Study).

Authors:  Philippe Rigoard; Manuel Roulaud; Lisa Goudman; Nihel Adjali; Amine Ounajim; Jimmy Voirin; Christophe Perruchoud; Bénédicte Bouche; Philippe Page; Rémy Guillevin; Mathieu Naudin; Martin Simoneau; Bertille Lorgeoux; Sandrine Baron; Kevin Nivole; Mathilde Many; Iona Maitre; Raphaël Rigoard; Romain David; Maarten Moens; Maxime Billot
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 2.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.