Literature DB >> 33328248

Limited Sensitivity of Hippocampal Synaptic Function or Network Oscillations to Unmodulated Kilohertz Electric Fields.

Zeinab Esmaeilpour1, Mark Jackson2, Greg Kronberg2, Tianhe Zhang3, Rosana Esteller3, Brad Hershey3, Marom Bikson2.   

Abstract

Understanding the cellular mechanisms of kilohertz (kHz) electrical stimulation is of broad interest in neuromodulation including forms of transcranial electrical stimulation, interferential stimulation, and high-rate spinal cord stimulation (SCS). Yet, the well-established low-pass filtering by neuronal membranes suggests minimal neuronal polarization in respond to charge-balanced kHz stimulation. The hippocampal brain slice model is among the most studied systems in neuroscience and exhaustively characterized in screening the effects of electrical stimulation. High-frequency electric fields of varied amplitudes (1-150 V/m), waveforms (sinusoidal, symmetrical pule, asymmetrical pulse) and frequencies (1 and10 kHz) were tested. Changes in single or paired-pulse field EPSPs (fEPSP) in CA1 were measured in response to radial-directed and tangential-directed electric fields, with brief (30 s) or long (30 min) application times. The effects of kHz stimulation on ongoing endogenous network activity were tested in carbachol-induced γ oscillation of CA3a and CA3c. Across 23 conditions evaluated, no significant changes in fEPSP were resolved, while responses were detected for within-slice control direct current (DC) fields; 1-kHz sinusoidal and pulse stimulation (≥60 V/m), but not 10 kHz, induced changes in oscillating neuronal network. We thus report no responses to low-amplitude 1-kHz or any 10-kHz fields, suggesting that any brain sensitivity to these fields is via yet to be-determined mechanism(s) of action which were not identified in our experimental preparation.
Copyright © 2020 Esmaeilpour et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brain stimulation; high-frequency stimulation; kilohertz electrical stimulation; neuronal excitability; γ oscillation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33328248      PMCID: PMC7773889          DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0368-20.2020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  eNeuro        ISSN: 2373-2822


  67 in total

Review 1.  Which elements are excited in electrical stimulation of mammalian central nervous system: a review.

Authors:  J B Ranck
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1975-11-21       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 2.  Interferential current therapy.

Authors:  G C Goats
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  Increasing human leg motor cortex excitability by transcranial high frequency random noise stimulation.

Authors:  Bence Laczó; Andrea Antal; Holger Rothkegel; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.406

4.  The "quasi-uniform" assumption in animal and computational models of non-invasive electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Marom Bikson; Jacek Dmochowski; Asif Rahman
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 8.955

5.  Modulation of activity and conduction in single dorsal column axons by kilohertz-frequency spinal cord stimulation.

Authors:  Nathan D Crosby; John J Janik; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Modulation of LTP at rat hippocampal CA3-CA1 synapses by direct current stimulation.

Authors:  F Ranieri; M V Podda; E Riccardi; G Frisullo; M Dileone; P Profice; F Pilato; V Di Lazzaro; C Grassi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Temperature increases by kilohertz frequency spinal cord stimulation.

Authors:  Adantchede L Zannou; Niranjan Khadka; Dennis Q Truong; Tianhe Zhang; Rosana Esteller; Brad Hershey; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 8.955

8.  Modulation of unitary glutamatergic synapses by neurotrophin-4/5 or brain-derived neurotrophic factor in hippocampal microcultures: presynaptic enhancement depends on pre-established paired-pulse facilitation.

Authors:  V Lessmann; R Heumann
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Direct current stimulation boosts synaptic gain and cooperativity in vitro.

Authors:  Asif Rahman; Belen Lafon; Lucas C Parra; Marom Bikson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-04-23       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Direct Current Stimulation Modulates LTP and LTD: Activity Dependence and Dendritic Effects.

Authors:  Greg Kronberg; Morgan Bridi; Ted Abel; Marom Bikson; Lucas C Parra
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 8.955

View more
  3 in total

1.  Amplitude modulated transcranial alternating current stimulation (AM-TACS) efficacy evaluation via phosphene induction.

Authors:  Carsten Thiele; Tino Zaehle; Aiden Haghikia; Philipp Ruhnau
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  The Predictive Value of Individual Electric Field Modeling for Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Induced Brain Modulation.

Authors:  Basil C Preisig; Alexis Hervais-Adelman
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 5.505

3.  High Gamma and Beta Temporal Interference Stimulation in the Human Motor Cortex Improves Motor Functions.

Authors:  Ru Ma; Xinzhao Xia; Wei Zhang; Zhuo Lu; Qianying Wu; Jiangtian Cui; Hongwen Song; Chuan Fan; Xueli Chen; Rujing Zha; Junjie Wei; Gong-Jun Ji; Xiaoxiao Wang; Bensheng Qiu; Xiaochu Zhang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 4.677

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.