Silva Arslanian1, Laure El Ghormli2, Joon Young Kim1, Fida Bacha3, Christine Chan4, Heba M Ismail1, Lorraine E Levitt Katz5, Lynne Levitsky6, Jeanie B Tryggestad7, Neil H White. 1. Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. 2. George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Rockville, MD elghorml@bsc.gwu.edu. 3. Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX. 4. University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO. 5. Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA. 6. Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Boston, MA. 7. University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:Obese youth without diabetes with monophasic oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) glucose response curves have lower insulin sensitivity and impaired β-cell function compared with those with biphasic curves. The OGTT glucose response curve has not been studied in youth-onset type 2 diabetes. Here we test the hypothesis that the OGTT glucose response curve at randomization in youth in the TODAY (Treatment Options for Type 2 Diabetes in Adolescents and Youth) study forecasts heightened glycemic failure rates and accelerated decline in β-cell function. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: OGTTs (n = 662) performed at randomization were categorized as monophasic, biphasic, or incessant increase. Demographics, insulin sensitivity (1/fasting insulin), C-peptide index (△C30/△G30), and β-cell function relative to insulin sensitivity (oral disposition index [oDI]) were compared among the three groups. RESULTS: At randomization, 21.7% had incessant increase, 68.6% monophasic, and 9.7% biphasic glucose response curves. The incessant increase group had similar insulin sensitivity but significantly lower C-peptide index and lower oDI, despite similar diabetes duration, compared with the other two groups. Glycemic failure rates were higher in the incessant increase group (58.3%) versus the monophasic group (42.3%) versus the biphasic group (39.1%) (P < 0.0001). The 6-month decline in C-peptide index (32.8% vs. 18.1% vs. 13.2%) and oDI (32.2% vs. 11.6% vs. 9.1%) was greatest in incessant increase versus monophasic and biphasic with no difference in insulin sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: In the TODAY study cohort, an incessant increase in the OGTT glucose response curve at randomization reflects reduced β-cell function and foretells increased glycemic failure rates with accelerated deterioration in β-cell function independent of diabetes duration and treatment assignment compared with monophasic and biphasic curves. The shape of the OGTT glucose response curve could be a metabolic biomarker prognosticating the response to therapy in youth with type 2 diabetes.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Obese youth without diabetes with monophasic oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) glucose response curves have lower insulin sensitivity and impaired β-cell function compared with those with biphasic curves. The OGTT glucose response curve has not been studied in youth-onset type 2 diabetes. Here we test the hypothesis that the OGTT glucose response curve at randomization in youth in the TODAY (Treatment Options for Type 2 Diabetes in Adolescents and Youth) study forecasts heightened glycemic failure rates and accelerated decline in β-cell function. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: OGTTs (n = 662) performed at randomization were categorized as monophasic, biphasic, or incessant increase. Demographics, insulin sensitivity (1/fasting insulin), C-peptide index (△C30/△G30), and β-cell function relative to insulin sensitivity (oral disposition index [oDI]) were compared among the three groups. RESULTS: At randomization, 21.7% had incessant increase, 68.6% monophasic, and 9.7% biphasic glucose response curves. The incessant increase group had similar insulin sensitivity but significantly lower C-peptide index and lower oDI, despite similar diabetes duration, compared with the other two groups. Glycemic failure rates were higher in the incessant increase group (58.3%) versus the monophasic group (42.3%) versus the biphasic group (39.1%) (P < 0.0001). The 6-month decline in C-peptide index (32.8% vs. 18.1% vs. 13.2%) and oDI (32.2% vs. 11.6% vs. 9.1%) was greatest in incessant increase versus monophasic and biphasic with no difference in insulin sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: In the TODAY study cohort, an incessant increase in the OGTT glucose response curve at randomization reflects reduced β-cell function and foretells increased glycemic failure rates with accelerated deterioration in β-cell function independent of diabetes duration and treatment assignment compared with monophasic and biphasic curves. The shape of the OGTT glucose response curve could be a metabolic biomarker prognosticating the response to therapy in youth with type 2 diabetes.
Authors: Otto Tschritter; Andreas Fritsche; Fatemeh Shirkavand; Fausto Machicao; Hans Häring; Michael Stumvoll Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Heba M Ismail; Ping Xu; Ingrid M Libman; Dorothy J Becker; Jennifer B Marks; Jay S Skyler; Jerry P Palmer; Jay M Sosenko Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2017-09-27 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Muhammad A Abdul-Ghani; Christopher P Jenkinson; Dawn K Richardson; Devjit Tripathy; Ralph A DeFronzo Journal: Diabetes Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Phil Zeitler; Kathryn Hirst; Laura Pyle; Barbara Linder; Kenneth Copeland; Silva Arslanian; Leona Cuttler; David M Nathan; Sherida Tollefsen; Denise Wilfley; Francine Kaufman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-04-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Joon Young Kim; Sara F Michaliszyn; Alexis Nasr; SoJung Lee; Hala Tfayli; Tamara Hannon; Kara S Hughan; Fida Bacha; Silva Arslanian Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2016-06-12 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Heba M Ismail; Mario A Cleves; Ping Xu; Ingrid M Libman; Dorothy J Becker; Jennifer B Marks; Jay S Skyler; Jerry P Palmer; Jay M Sosenko Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2020-09-08 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Armando Peña; Joon Young Kim; Jessica A Reyes; Kiley B Vander Wyst; Stephanie L Ayers; Micah L Olson; Allison N Williams; Gabriel Q Shaibi Journal: Pediatr Obes Date: 2021-11-03 Impact factor: 4.000
Authors: Michael Bergman; Muhammad Abdul-Ghani; Ralph A DeFronzo; Melania Manco; Giorgio Sesti; Teresa Vanessa Fiorentino; Antonio Ceriello; Mary Rhee; Lawrence S Phillips; Stephanie Chung; Celeste Cravalho; Ram Jagannathan; Louis Monnier; Claude Colette; David Owens; Cristina Bianchi; Stefano Del Prato; Mariana P Monteiro; João Sérgio Neves; Jose Luiz Medina; Maria Paula Macedo; Rogério Tavares Ribeiro; João Filipe Raposo; Brenda Dorcely; Nouran Ibrahim; Martin Buysschaert Journal: Diabetes Res Clin Pract Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 5.602
Authors: Silva A Arslanian; Laure El Ghormli; Joon Young Kim; Ashley H Tjaden; Elena Barengolts; Sonia Caprio; Tamara S Hannon; Kieren J Mather; Kristen J Nadeau; Kristina M Utzschneider; Steven E Kahn Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2021-01-12 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Kalie L Tommerdahl; John T Brinton; Tim Vigers; Melanie Cree-Green; Philip S Zeitler; Kristen J Nadeau; Christine L Chan Journal: J Cyst Fibros Date: 2020-09-11 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Steven E Kahn; Yi-Chun Chen; Nathalie Esser; Austin J Taylor; Daniël H van Raalte; Sakeneh Zraika; C Bruce Verchere Journal: Endocr Rev Date: 2021-09-28 Impact factor: 25.261