BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing prevalence of type 2 diabetes in youth, there are few data to guide treatment. We compared the efficacy of three treatment regimens to achieve durable glycemic control in children and adolescents with recent-onset type 2 diabetes. METHODS:Eligible patients 10 to 17 years of age were treated withmetformin (at a dose of 1000 mg twice daily) to attain a glycated hemoglobin level of less than 8% and were randomly assigned to continued treatment with metformin alone or to metformin combined with rosiglitazone (4 mg twice a day) or a lifestyle-intervention program focusing on weight loss through eating and activity behaviors. The primary outcome was loss of glycemic control, defined as a glycated hemoglobin level of at least 8% for 6 months or sustained metabolic decompensation requiring insulin. RESULTS: Of the 699 randomly assigned participants (mean duration of diagnosed type 2 diabetes, 7.8 months), 319 (45.6%) reached the primary outcome over an average follow-up of 3.86 years. Rates of failure were 51.7% (120 of 232 participants), 38.6% (90 of 233), and 46.6% (109 of 234) for metformin alone, metformin plus rosiglitazone, and metformin plus lifestyle intervention, respectively. Metformin plus rosiglitazone was superior to metformin alone (P=0.006); metformin plus lifestyle intervention was intermediate but not significantly different from metformin alone or metformin plus rosiglitazone. Prespecified analyses according to sex and race or ethnic group showed differences in sustained effectiveness, with metformin alone least effective in non-Hispanic black participants and metformin plus rosiglitazone most effective in girls. Serious adverse events were reported in 19.2% of participants. CONCLUSIONS:Monotherapy with metformin was associated with durable glycemic control in approximately half of children and adolescents with type 2 diabetes. The addition of rosiglitazone, but not an intensive lifestyle intervention, was superior to metformin alone. (Funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and others; TODAY ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00081328.).
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing prevalence of type 2 diabetes in youth, there are few data to guide treatment. We compared the efficacy of three treatment regimens to achieve durable glycemic control in children and adolescents with recent-onset type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Eligible patients 10 to 17 years of age were treated with metformin (at a dose of 1000 mg twice daily) to attain a glycated hemoglobin level of less than 8% and were randomly assigned to continued treatment with metformin alone or to metformin combined with rosiglitazone (4 mg twice a day) or a lifestyle-intervention program focusing on weight loss through eating and activity behaviors. The primary outcome was loss of glycemic control, defined as a glycated hemoglobin level of at least 8% for 6 months or sustained metabolic decompensation requiring insulin. RESULTS: Of the 699 randomly assigned participants (mean duration of diagnosed type 2 diabetes, 7.8 months), 319 (45.6%) reached the primary outcome over an average follow-up of 3.86 years. Rates of failure were 51.7% (120 of 232 participants), 38.6% (90 of 233), and 46.6% (109 of 234) for metformin alone, metformin plus rosiglitazone, and metformin plus lifestyle intervention, respectively. Metformin plus rosiglitazone was superior to metformin alone (P=0.006); metformin plus lifestyle intervention was intermediate but not significantly different from metformin alone or metformin plus rosiglitazone. Prespecified analyses according to sex and race or ethnic group showed differences in sustained effectiveness, with metformin alone least effective in non-Hispanic black participants and metformin plus rosiglitazone most effective in girls. Serious adverse events were reported in 19.2% of participants. CONCLUSIONS: Monotherapy with metformin was associated with durable glycemic control in approximately half of children and adolescents with type 2 diabetes. The addition of rosiglitazone, but not an intensive lifestyle intervention, was superior to metformin alone. (Funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and others; TODAY ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00081328.).
Authors: Joseph L Andreacci; Robert J Robertson; John J Dubé; Deborah J Aaron; Curt B Dixon; Silva A Arslanian Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Steven E Kahn; Steven M Haffner; Mark A Heise; William H Herman; Rury R Holman; Nigel P Jones; Barbara G Kravitz; John M Lachin; M Colleen O'Neill; Bernard Zinman; Giancarlo Viberti Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-12-04 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Rury R Holman; Sanjoy K Paul; M Angelyn Bethel; David R Matthews; H Andrew W Neil Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-09-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Lorraine E Levitt Katz; Fida Bacha; Samuel S Gidding; Ruth S Weinstock; Laure El Ghormli; Ingrid Libman; Kristen J Nadeau; Kristin Porter; Santica Marcovina Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2018-02-02 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Silva Arslanian; Laure El Ghormli; Morey H Haymond; Christine L Chan; Steven D Chernausek; Rachelle G Gandica; Rose Gubitosi-Klug; Lynne L Levitsky; Maggie Siska; Steven M Willi Journal: Pediatr Diabetes Date: 2020-03-03 Impact factor: 4.866
Authors: Claudia K Fox; Amy C Gross; Eric M Bomberg; Justin R Ryder; Megan M Oberle; Carolyn T Bramante; Aaron S Kelly Journal: Curr Obes Rep Date: 2019-09
Authors: Candice M Klingerman; Michelle E Stipanovic; Mohammad Bader; Christopher J Lynch Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2013-01-17 Impact factor: 9.306