Literature DB >> 33436401

OGTT Glucose Response Curves, Insulin Sensitivity, and β-Cell Function in RISE: Comparison Between Youth and Adults at Randomization and in Response to Interventions to Preserve β-Cell Function.

Silva A Arslanian1, Laure El Ghormli2, Joon Young Kim3, Ashley H Tjaden4, Elena Barengolts5, Sonia Caprio6, Tamara S Hannon7, Kieren J Mather7,8, Kristen J Nadeau9, Kristina M Utzschneider10, Steven E Kahn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We examined the glucose response curves (biphasic [BPh], monophasic [MPh], incessant increase [IIn]) during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and their relationship to insulin sensitivity (IS) and β-cell function (βCF) in youth versus adults with impaired glucose tolerance or recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSThis was both a cross-sectional and a longitudinal evaluation of participants in the RISE study randomized to metformin alone for 12 months or glargine for 3 months followed by metformin for 9 months. At baseline/randomization, OGTTs (85 youth, 353 adults) were categorized as BPh, MPh, or IIn. The relationship of the glucose response curves to hyperglycemic clamp-measured IS and βCF at baseline and the change in glucose response curves 12 months after randomization were assessed.RESULTSAt randomization, the prevalence of the BPh curve was significantly higher in youth than adults (18.8% vs. 8.2%), with no differences in MPh or IIn. IS did not differ across glucose response curves in youth or adults. However, irrespective of curve type, youth had lower IS than adults (P < 0.05). βCF was lowest in IIn versus MPh and BPh in youth and adults (P < 0.05), yet compared with adults, youth had higher βCF in BPh and MPh (P < 0.005) but not IIn. At month 12, the change in glucose response curves did not differ between youth and adults, and there was no treatment effect.CONCLUSIONSDespite a twofold higher prevalence of the more favorable BPh curve in youth at randomization, RISE interventions did not result in beneficial changes in glucose response curves in youth compared with adults. Moreover, the typical β-cell hypersecretion in youth was not present in the IIn curve, emphasizing the severity of β-cell dysfunction in youth with this least favorable glucose response curve.
© 2021 by the American Diabetes Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33436401      PMCID: PMC7896250          DOI: 10.2337/dc20-2134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  27 in total

1.  Assessing the shape of the glucose curve during an oral glucose tolerance test.

Authors:  Otto Tschritter; Andreas Fritsche; Fatemeh Shirkavand; Fausto Machicao; Hans Häring; Michael Stumvoll
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Beta-cell function and insulin sensitivity contribute to the shape of plasma glucose curve during an oral glucose tolerance test in non-diabetic individuals.

Authors:  M Kanauchi; K Kimura; K Kanauchi; Y Saito
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Identification, pathophysiology, and clinical implications of primary insulin hypersecretion in nondiabetic adults and adolescents.

Authors:  Domenico Tricò; Andrea Natali; Silva Arslanian; Andrea Mari; Ele Ferrannini
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2018-12-20

4.  Metabolic Contrasts Between Youth and Adults With Impaired Glucose Tolerance or Recently Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes: II. Observations Using the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  Shape of glucose, insulin, C-peptide curves during a 3-h oral glucose tolerance test: any relationship with the degree of glucose tolerance?

Authors:  Andrea Tura; Umberto Morbiducci; Stefano Sbrignadello; Yvonne Winhofer; Giovanni Pacini; Alexandra Kautzky-Willer
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 3.619

6.  Insulin sensitivity across the lifespan from obese adolescents to obese adults with impaired glucose tolerance: Who is worse off?

Authors:  Silva Arslanian; Joon Young Kim; Alexis Nasr; Fida Bacha; Hala Tfayli; SoJung Lee; Frederico G S Toledo
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.866

7.  The Shape of the Glucose Response Curve During an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test: Forerunner of Heightened Glycemic Failure Rates and Accelerated Decline in β-Cell Function in TODAY.

Authors:  Silva Arslanian; Laure El Ghormli; Joon Young Kim; Fida Bacha; Christine Chan; Heba M Ismail; Lorraine E Levitt Katz; Lynne Levitsky; Jeanie B Tryggestad; Neil H White
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  The Shape of the Glucose Response Curve During an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test Heralds Biomarkers of Type 2 Diabetes Risk in Obese Youth.

Authors:  Joon Young Kim; Sara F Michaliszyn; Alexis Nasr; SoJung Lee; Hala Tfayli; Tamara Hannon; Kara S Hughan; Fida Bacha; Silva Arslanian
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2016-06-12       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Short-term variability in measures of glycemia and implications for the classification of diabetes.

Authors:  Elizabeth Selvin; Ciprian M Crainiceanu; Frederick L Brancati; Josef Coresh
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007-07-23

10.  Restoring Insulin Secretion (RISE): design of studies of β-cell preservation in prediabetes and early type 2 diabetes across the life span.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  6 in total

1.  Changes in OGTT-derived biomarkers in response to lifestyle intervention among Latino adolescents with obesity.

Authors:  Armando Peña; Joon Young Kim; Jessica A Reyes; Kiley B Vander Wyst; Stephanie L Ayers; Micah L Olson; Allison N Williams; Gabriel Q Shaibi
Journal:  Pediatr Obes       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 4.000

Review 2.  Spectrum of Phenotypes and Causes of Type 2 Diabetes in Children.

Authors:  Amy S Shah; Kristen J Nadeau; Dana Dabelea; Maria J Redondo
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 16.048

Review 3.  Toward an Improved Classification of Type 2 Diabetes: Lessons From Research into the Heterogeneity of a Complex Disease.

Authors:  Maria J Redondo; Ashok Balasubramanyam
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 6.134

4.  Shape of the OGTT glucose response curve: relationship with β-cell function and differences by sex, race, and BMI in adults with early type 2 diabetes treated with metformin.

Authors:  Kristina M Utzschneider; Naji Younes; Neda Rasouli; Joshua I Barzilay; Mary Ann Banerji; Robert M Cohen; Erica V Gonzalez; Faramarz Ismail-Beigi; Kieren J Mather; Philip Raskin; Deborah J Wexler; John M Lachin; Steven E Kahn
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2021-09

5.  Patient-Wise Methodology to Assess Glycemic Health Status: Applications to Quantify the Efficacy and Physiological Targets of Polyphenols on Glycemic Control.

Authors:  Álvaro Olivera-Nappa; Sebastian Contreras; María Florencia Tevy; David Medina-Ortiz; Andrés Leschot; Pilar Vigil; Carlos Conca
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-02-17

Review 6.  The β Cell in Diabetes: Integrating Biomarkers With Functional Measures.

Authors:  Steven E Kahn; Yi-Chun Chen; Nathalie Esser; Austin J Taylor; Daniël H van Raalte; Sakeneh Zraika; C Bruce Verchere
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 25.261

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.