Kalie L Tommerdahl1, John T Brinton2, Tim Vigers3, Melanie Cree-Green4, Philip S Zeitler5, Kristen J Nadeau4, Christine L Chan5. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Endocrinology, Children's Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA; Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA; Center for Women's Health Research, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA. Electronic address: Kalie-Tommerdahl@childrenscolorado.org. 2. Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Endocrinology, Children's Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA; Department of Biostatistics, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, Colorado, USA. 3. Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA; Department of Biostatistics, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, Colorado, USA. 4. Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Endocrinology, Children's Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA; Center for Women's Health Research, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA. 5. Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Endocrinology, Children's Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Alternate methods for characterizing oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT) have emerged as superior to the 2-hour glucose in identifying individuals at risk for type 2 diabetes. The significance of these methods in cystic fibrosis (CF) is unclear. We compared 3 OGTT classifications in youth with CF: 1. curve shape (biphasic vs. monophasic), 2. time to glucose peak (≤30minutes vs. >30minutes), 3. 1-hour glucose (1hG) <155 mg/dL vs. ≥155 mg/dL to traditional OGTT criteria to determine which best identifies lower oral disposition index (oDI), pulmonary function, and body mass index (BMI). METHODS: Youth 10-18 years with CF, not on insulin, underwent 2-hour OGTT. Glucoses were classified by traditional criteria and 3 alternate methods as normal (biphasic curve, glucose peak ≤30minutes, and/or 1hG <155 mg/dL) or abnormal (monophasic curve, glucose peak >30minutes, and/or 1hG ≥155 mg/dL). oDI was calculated [1/fasting insulin*(ΔInsulin0-30 min/ΔGlucose0-30 min)]. Mean oDI, BMI, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), and forced vital capacity (FVC) were compared by OGTT classification. RESULTS: Fifty-two youth with CF participated (mean±SD age 13±4years; 37% male; BMI z-score 0.0±0.8; FEV1 88±16.3%; FVC 97±14.8%). Late time to peak glucose and 1hG ≥155 mg/dL identified individuals with lower oDI (p=0.01); traditional OGTT criteria for prediabetes did not. No OGTT classification identified individuals with worse BMI nor pulmonary function. oDI was not associated with BMI, FEV1, or FVC. CONCLUSIONS: Alternate OGTT measures including time to peak glucose and 1hG better identify oDI abnormalities than traditional criteria. Further studies are required to determine whether these alternate methods identify individuals with CF at risk for future clinical decline.
BACKGROUND: Alternate methods for characterizing oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT) have emerged as superior to the 2-hour glucose in identifying individuals at risk for type 2 diabetes. The significance of these methods in cystic fibrosis (CF) is unclear. We compared 3 OGTT classifications in youth with CF: 1. curve shape (biphasic vs. monophasic), 2. time to glucose peak (≤30minutes vs. >30minutes), 3. 1-hour glucose (1hG) <155 mg/dL vs. ≥155 mg/dL to traditional OGTT criteria to determine which best identifies lower oral disposition index (oDI), pulmonary function, and body mass index (BMI). METHODS: Youth 10-18 years with CF, not on insulin, underwent 2-hour OGTT. Glucoses were classified by traditional criteria and 3 alternate methods as normal (biphasic curve, glucose peak ≤30minutes, and/or 1hG <155 mg/dL) or abnormal (monophasic curve, glucose peak >30minutes, and/or 1hG ≥155 mg/dL). oDI was calculated [1/fasting insulin*(ΔInsulin0-30 min/ΔGlucose0-30 min)]. Mean oDI, BMI, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), and forced vital capacity (FVC) were compared by OGTT classification. RESULTS: Fifty-two youth with CF participated (mean±SD age 13±4years; 37% male; BMI z-score 0.0±0.8; FEV1 88±16.3%; FVC 97±14.8%). Late time to peak glucose and 1hG ≥155 mg/dL identified individuals with lower oDI (p=0.01); traditional OGTT criteria for prediabetes did not. No OGTT classification identified individuals with worse BMI nor pulmonary function. oDI was not associated with BMI, FEV1, or FVC. CONCLUSIONS: Alternate OGTT measures including time to peak glucose and 1hG better identify oDI abnormalities than traditional criteria. Further studies are required to determine whether these alternate methods identify individuals with CF at risk for future clinical decline.
Authors: Silva Arslanian; Laure El Ghormli; Joon Young Kim; Fida Bacha; Christine Chan; Heba M Ismail; Lorraine E Levitt Katz; Lynne Levitsky; Jeanie B Tryggestad; Neil H White Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2018-11-19 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Joon Young Kim; Sara F Michaliszyn; Alexis Nasr; SoJung Lee; Hala Tfayli; Tamara Hannon; Kara S Hughan; Fida Bacha; Silva Arslanian Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2016-06-12 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Antoinette Moran; Carol Brunzell; Richard C Cohen; Marcia Katz; Bruce C Marshall; Gary Onady; Karen A Robinson; Kathryn A Sabadosa; Arlene Stecenko; Bonnie Slovis Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Kristina M Utzschneider; Ronald L Prigeon; Mirjam V Faulenbach; Jenny Tong; Darcy B Carr; Edward J Boyko; Donna L Leonetti; Marguerite J McNeely; Wilfred Y Fujimoto; Steven E Kahn Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2008-10-28 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Christine L Chan; Laura Pyle; Tim Vigers; Philip S Zeitler; Kristen J Nadeau Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2022-01-18 Impact factor: 6.134