PURPOSE: To develop an accelerated cardiac perfusion pulse sequence and test whether it is capable of increasing spatial coverage, generating high-quality images, and enabling quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF). METHODS: We implemented an accelerated first-pass cardiac perfusion pulse sequence by combining radial k-space sampling, compressed sensing (CS), and k-space weighted image contrast (KWIC) filtering. The proposed and clinical standard pulse sequences were evaluated in a randomized order in 13 patients at rest. For visual analysis, 3 readers graded the conspicuity of wall enhancement, artifact, and noise level on a 5-point Likert scale (overall score index = sum of 3 individual scores). Resting MBF was calculated using a Fermi function model with and without KWIC filtering. Mean visual scores and MBF values were compared between sequences using appropriate statistical tests. RESULTS: The proposed pulse sequence produced greater spatial coverage (6-8 slices) with higher spatial resolution (1.6 × 1.6 × 8 mm3 ) and shorter readout duration (78 ms) compared to clinical standard (3-4 slices, 3 × 3 × 8 mm3 , 128 ms, respectively). The overall image score index between accelerated (11.1 ± 1.3) and clinical standard (11.2 ± 1.3) was not significantly different (P = 0.64). Mean resting MBF values with KWIC filtering (0.9-1.2 mL/g/min across different slices) were significantly lower (P < 0.0001) than those without KWIC filtering (3.1-4.3 mL/g/min) and agreed better with values reported in literature. CONCLUSION: An accelerated, first-pass cardiac perfusion pulse sequence with radial k-space sampling, CS, and KWIC filtering is capable of increasing spatial coverage, generating high-quality images, and enabling quantification of MBF.
PURPOSE: To develop an accelerated cardiac perfusion pulse sequence and test whether it is capable of increasing spatial coverage, generating high-quality images, and enabling quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF). METHODS: We implemented an accelerated first-pass cardiac perfusion pulse sequence by combining radial k-space sampling, compressed sensing (CS), and k-space weighted image contrast (KWIC) filtering. The proposed and clinical standard pulse sequences were evaluated in a randomized order in 13 patients at rest. For visual analysis, 3 readers graded the conspicuity of wall enhancement, artifact, and noise level on a 5-point Likert scale (overall score index = sum of 3 individual scores). Resting MBF was calculated using a Fermi function model with and without KWIC filtering. Mean visual scores and MBF values were compared between sequences using appropriate statistical tests. RESULTS: The proposed pulse sequence produced greater spatial coverage (6-8 slices) with higher spatial resolution (1.6 × 1.6 × 8 mm3 ) and shorter readout duration (78 ms) compared to clinical standard (3-4 slices, 3 × 3 × 8 mm3 , 128 ms, respectively). The overall image score index between accelerated (11.1 ± 1.3) and clinical standard (11.2 ± 1.3) was not significantly different (P = 0.64). Mean resting MBF values with KWIC filtering (0.9-1.2 mL/g/min across different slices) were significantly lower (P < 0.0001) than those without KWIC filtering (3.1-4.3 mL/g/min) and agreed better with values reported in literature. CONCLUSION: An accelerated, first-pass cardiac perfusion pulse sequence with radial k-space sampling, CS, and KWIC filtering is capable of increasing spatial coverage, generating high-quality images, and enabling quantification of MBF.
Authors: Stefan Wundrak; Jan Paul; Johannes Ulrici; Erich Hell; Margrit-Ann Geibel; Peter Bernhardt; Wolfgang Rottbauer; Volker Rasche Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2015-07-07 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Manish Motwani; Roy Jogiya; Sebastian Kozerke; John P Greenwood; Sven Plein Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2013-03-01 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Neil Chatterjee; Brandon C Benefield; Kathleen R Harris; Jacob U Fluckiger; Timothy Carroll; Daniel C Lee Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2016-09-08 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Lexiaozi Fan; Daming Shen; Hassan Haji-Valizadeh; Nivedita K Naresh; James C Carr; Benjamin H Freed; Daniel C Lee; Daniel Kim Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2020-01-14 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Jason Kraig Mendes; Ganesh Adluru; Devavrat Likhite; Merlin J Fair; Peter D Gatehouse; Ye Tian; Apoorva Pedgaonkar; Brent Wilson; Edward V R DiBella Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-10-31 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: KyungPyo Hong; Jeremy D Collins; Benjamin H Freed; Lexiaozi Fan; Andrew E Arai; Li-Yueh Hsu; Daniel C Lee; Daniel Kim Journal: Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging Date: 2020-04-16
Authors: Lexiaozi Fan; Bradley D Allen; Austin E Culver; Li-Yueh Hsu; Kyungpyo Hong; Brandon C Benefield; James C Carr; Daniel C Lee; Daniel Kim Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2021-03-24 Impact factor: 3.737
Authors: KyungPyo Hong; Florian Schiffers; Amanda L DiCarlo; Cynthia K Rigsby; Hassan Haji-Valizadeh; Daniel C Lee; Michael Markl; Aggelos K Katsaggelos; Daniel Kim Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2021-10-21 Impact factor: 4.174
Authors: Calvin W L Chin; Stuart A Cook; Thu-Thao Le; Briana W Y Ang; Jennifer A Bryant; Chee Yang Chin; Khung Keong Yeo; Philip E H Wong; Kay Woon Ho; Jack W C Tan; Phong Teck Lee Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2021-03-04 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Joao Tourais; Cian M Scannell; Torben Schneider; Ebraham Alskaf; Richard Crawley; Filippo Bosio; Javier Sanchez-Gonzalez; Mariya Doneva; Christophe Schülke; Jakob Meineke; Jochen Keupp; Jouke Smink; Marcel Breeuwer; Amedeo Chiribiri; Markus Henningsson; Teresa Correia Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-04-29
Authors: Lexiaozi Fan; Kyungpyo Hong; Li-Yueh Hsu; James C Carr; Bradley D Allen; Daniel C Lee; Daniel Kim Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2022-04-04 Impact factor: 3.737
Authors: Sarah McElroy; Giulio Ferrazzi; Muhummad Sohaib Nazir; Karl P Kunze; Radhouene Neji; Peter Speier; Daniel Stäb; Christoph Forman; Reza Razavi; Amedeo Chiribiri; Sébastien Roujol Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2020-06-12 Impact factor: 3.737