Literature DB >> 34607316

Accelerating compressed sensing reconstruction of subsampled radial k-space data using geometrically-derived density compensation.

KyungPyo Hong1, Florian Schiffers2, Amanda L DiCarlo1, Cynthia K Rigsby1,3, Hassan Haji-Valizadeh1, Daniel C Lee1,4, Michael Markl1,5, Aggelos K Katsaggelos1,2,6, Daniel Kim1,5.   

Abstract

Objective.To accelerate compressed sensing (CS) reconstruction of subsampled radial k-space data using a geometrically-derived density compensation function (gDCF) without significant loss in image quality.Approach.We developed a theoretical framework to calculate a gDCF based on Nyquist distance along the radial and circumferential directions of a discrete polar coordinate system. Our gDCF was compared against standard DCF (e.g. ramp filter) and another commonly used DCF (modified Shepp-Logan (SL) filter). The resulting image quality produced by each DCF was quantified using normalized root-mean-square-error (NRMSE), blur metric (1 = blurriest; 0 = sharpest), and structural similarity index (SSIM; 1 = perfect match; 0 = no match) compared with the reference. For filtered backprojection (FBP) of phantom data obtained at the Nyquist sampling rate, Cartesian k-space sampling was used as the reference. For CS reconstruction of subsampled cardiac magnetic resonance imaging datasets (real-time cardiac cine data with 11 projections per frame,n = 20 patients; cardiac perfusion data with 30 projections per frame,n = 19 patients), CS reconstruction without DCF was used as the reference.Main results.The NRMSE, SSIM, and blur metrics of the phantom data were good for all DCFs, confirming that our gDCF produces uniform densities at the upper limit (Nyquist). For CS reconstruction of subsampled real-time cine and cardiac perfusion datasets, the image quality metrics (SSIM, NRMSE) were significantly (p < 0.05) higher for our gDCF than other DCFs, and the reconstruction time was significantly (p < 0.05) faster for our gDCF (reference) than no DCF (11.9%-52.9% slower), standard DCF (23.9%-57.6% slower), and modified SL filter (13.5%-34.8% slower).Significance.The proposed gDCF accelerates CS reconstruction of subsampled radial k-space data without significant loss in image quality compared with no DCF as the reference.
© 2021 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; compressed sensing; density compensation; filtered backprojection; image reconstruction; radial k-space sampling

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34607316      PMCID: PMC8854616          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac2c9d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   4.174


  28 in total

1.  Adaptive reconstruction of phased array MR imagery.

Authors:  D O Walsh; A F Gmitro; M W Marcellin
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Sampling density compensation in MRI: rationale and an iterative numerical solution.

Authors:  J G Pipe; P Menon
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Highly constrained backprojection for time-resolved MRI.

Authors:  C A Mistretta; O Wieben; J Velikina; W Block; J Perry; Y Wu; K Johnson; Y Wu
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Inherently self-calibrating non-Cartesian parallel imaging.

Authors:  Ernest N Yeh; Matthias Stuber; Charles A McKenzie; Rene M Botnar; Tim Leiner; Michael A Ohliger; Aaron K Grant; Jacob D Willig-Onwuachi; Daniel K Sodickson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Contrast-enhanced 4D radial coronary artery imaging at 3.0 T within a single breath-hold.

Authors:  Xiaoming Bi; Jaeseok Park; Andrew C Larson; Qiang Zhang; Orlando Simonetti; Debiao Li
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  CT filtration aliasing artifacts.

Authors:  C R Crawford
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Accelerated, first-pass cardiac perfusion pulse sequence with radial k-space sampling, compressed sensing, and k-space weighted image contrast reconstruction tailored for visual analysis and quantification of myocardial blood flow.

Authors:  Nivedita K Naresh; Hassan Haji-Valizadeh; Pascale J Aouad; Matthew J Barrett; Kelvin Chow; Ann B Ragin; Jeremy D Collins; James C Carr; Daniel C Lee; Daniel Kim
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Hybrid adiabatic-rectangular pulse train for effective saturation of magnetization within the whole heart at 3 T.

Authors:  Daniel Kim; Niels Oesingmann; Kellyanne McGorty
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Quantification of myocardial perfusion using CMR with a radial data acquisition: comparison with a dual-bolus method.

Authors:  Tae Ho Kim; Nathan A Pack; Liyong Chen; Edward V R DiBella
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Accelerating Non-Cartesian MRI Reconstruction Convergence Using k-Space Preconditioning.

Authors:  Frank Ong; Martin Uecker; Michael Lustig
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 10.048

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.