| Literature DB >> 30305845 |
Xiao-Man Sun1, Lu-Jing Ren1,2, Quan-Yu Zhao3, Xiao-Jun Ji1,2, He Huang3,4,2.
Abstract
Microalgae have drawn great attention as promising sustainable source of lipids and carotenoids. Their lipid and carotenoids accumulation machinery can be trigged by the stress conditions such as nutrient limitation or exposure to the damaging physical factors. However, stressful conditions often adversely affect microalgal growth and cause oxidative damage to the cells, which can eventually reduce the yield of the desired products. To overcome these limitations, two-stage cultivation strategies and supplementation of growth-promoting agents have traditionally been utilized, but developing new highly adapted strains is theoretically the simplest strategy. In addition to genetic engineering, adaptive laboratory evolution (ALE) is frequently used to develop beneficial phenotypes in industrial microorganisms during long-term selection under specific stress conditions. In recent years, many studies have gradually introduced ALE as a powerful tool to improve the biological properties of microalgae, especially for improving the production of lipid and carotenoids. In this review, strategies for the manipulation of stress in microalgal lipids and carotenoids production are summarized and discussed. Furthermore, this review summarizes the overall state of ALE technology, including available selection pressures, methods, and their applications in microalgae for the improved production of lipids and carotenoids.Entities:
Keywords: Adaptive laboratory evolution; Carotenoids; Growth-promoting agents; Lipid; Microalgae; Stress
Year: 2018 PMID: 30305845 PMCID: PMC6171298 DOI: 10.1186/s13068-018-1275-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
Fig. 1Oxidative damage under stress conditions and manipulation of stresses by transcriptional engineering. GSH glutathione, ER endoplasmic reticulum
Fig. 2Effects of typical nutrient- and environmental stresses on the production of lipid and carotenoids in microalgae, and the resulting two-stage cultivation strategies used to overcome the biomass limitation imposed by the stress conditions
Manipulation of stress factors by phytohormones
| Species | Phytohormones | Stress | Performance | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ABA | Nitrogen-deficient stress | The dry biomass yield was increased up to 2.1 fold | [ |
|
| IAA, DA-6 | Nitrogen-limited stress | Growth and lipid accumulation were both promoted and phytohormones enhances CAT and SOD enzyme activities | [ |
|
| ABA, CKs | Nitrogen-depletion stress | Exogenous CKs stimulate cell-cycle progression, but ABA acts as both an algal growth repressor and a positive regulator in response to stresses | [ |
|
| IAA, GA3, KIN, TRIA, ABA | Nitrogen-limited stress | All five of the tested phytohormones significantly increased microalgal growth, particularly in nitrogen-limited media | [ |
|
| ABA | Osmotic and salt stresses | ABA treatment markedly reduced ROS generation and enhanced gene expression of the antioxidant enzymes | [ |
|
| IAA, PAA, IBA, NAA | Oxidative stress | All auxins can suppress lipid peroxidation and hydrogen peroxide accumulation | [ |
|
| ABA | Oxidative stress | Addition of ABA improve the growth of this alga | [ |
Transcription factors involved in stresses
| Species | Transcription factors | Stresses | Performances | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| PHR1 | Phosphate starvation | PHR1 acts downstream in the phosphate starvation signaling pathway via binding the promoter of phosphate starvation responsive structural genes | [ |
|
| LCR1 | CO2-limiting stress | LCR1 transmits the low CO2 signal to at least three CO2-responsive genes and then fully induces carbon-concentrating mechanism | [ |
|
| WRKY | Salt stress | All the carotenogenic genes can be recognized by WRKY transcription factors | [ |
|
| NRR1 | Nitrogen starvation | NRR1, a putative SQUAMOSA promoter binding protein-type transcription factor, was proved to be a regulator of N-induced TAG biosynthesis | [ |
|
| PSR1 | Nitrogen starvation | PSR1 is a pivotal switch that triggers cytosolic lipid accumulation | [ |
|
| PSR1 | Phosphorus starvation | PSR1 gene is an important determinant of lipid and starch accumulation in response to phosphorus starvation but not nitrogen starvation | [ |
|
| GmDof4 | Nitrogen starvation | Increase of lipid content without growth limitation | [ |
|
| NsbHLH2 | Nitrogen limitation | Biomass and FAME productivity was increased by 36% and 33%, respectively | [ |
|
| ZnCys | Nitrogen starvation | Lipid is doubled by attenuation of ZnCys expression | [ |
Fig. 3Adaptive laboratory evolution (ALE) can be performed in the laboratory using three broad approaches. A Serial transfer can be performed in shake flasks with liquid medium where nutrients will not be limited, and an aliquot of the culture is transferred to a new flask with fresh medium for an additional round of growth at regular intervals. B Colony transfer is similar to serial transfer, but is performed on plates with solid medium. C A chemostat comprises a culture vessel in which the population grows under continuous agitation and aeration. Fresh medium is added into the vessel at a defined rate and culture broth is harvested continuously during the process. The figures a, b, and c illustrate the number of cells that grew during ALE the processes shown in A, B, and C, respectively
(This figure was modified from Jeong et al. [112])
Typical adaptive laboratory evolution experiments with microalgae
| Microalgal species | Selection pressure | Selection time | Performance | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Nitrogen limitation | 50 days | The numbers of intracellular lipid bodies was massively increased | [ |
|
| Inhibitory concentration of glucose | 650 days | High biomass and lipid accumulation was achieved | [ |
|
| High glycerol concentration | 22 days | The conversion of glycerol into TAG was improved | [ |
|
| Phenol as sole carbon source | 40 passages | The lipid production was increased by twofold | [ |
|
| Nitrogen starvation | 84 days | Lipid productivity was increased by 2.36 times | [ |
|
| 660 nm LEDs | 114 days | Maximum biomass density was achieved | [ |
|
| Combined blue and red light | 80 days | Increase of accumulation of carotenoids under combined blue and red light | [ |
|
| Combined blue and red light | 60 days | Increase of biomass production and fucoxanthin accumulation | [ |
| 10% and 20% CO2 | 97 days | Enhanced CO2 fixation capability and carotenoids accumulation | [ | |
| Agitation at 230 rpm | 40 days | Maximum cell dry weight and DHA yield were observed | [ |