| Literature DB >> 22028828 |
Dae-Hee Lee1, Adam M Feist, Christian L Barrett, Bernhard Ø Palsson.
Abstract
Adaptive laboratory evolution (ALE) under controlled conditions has become a valuable approach for the study of the genetic and biochemical basis for microbial adaptation under a given selection pressure. Conventionally, the timescale in ALE experiments has been set in terms of number of generations. As mutations are believed to occur primarily during cell division in growing cultures, the cumulative number of cell divisions (CCD) would be an alternative way to set the timescale for ALE. Here we show that in short-term ALE (up to 40-50 days), Escherichia coli, under growth rate selection pressure, was found to undergo approximately 10(11.2) total cumulative cell divisions in the population to produce a new stable growth phenotype that results from 2 to 8 mutations. Continuous exposure to a low level of the mutagen N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine was found to accelerate this timescale and led to a superior growth rate phenotype with a much larger number of mutations as determined with whole-genome sequencing. These results would be useful for the fundamental kinetics of the ALE process in designing ALE experiments and provide a basis for its quantitative description.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22028828 PMCID: PMC3196513 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026172
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1The conceptual process of ALE and calculations used to characterize ALE.
(A) The top image demonstrates how serial passage is used to select for growth rate where cells are grown in flasks and passed below entering stationary phase to maintain exponential growth. During this evolution process, the growth rate of the population increases or maintains in consecutive flasks. ALE experiments are stopped when an observed stable phenotype is encountered and an overall increase in fitness can be calculated from the initial and final growth rates. The average dilution factor per passage is 1×10−7–1×10−1 on a volume per volume basis. (B) A diagram of how a single bacterial cell grows, replicates, and undergoes cytokinesis. From this process, the number of cells at a given point in time (N) can be measured, the number of generations (n) can be calculated by determining the initial number of cells in a culture (N0) and assuming exponential growth and a negligible death rate, and the CCD can be calculated by summing divisions from each flask.
Figure 2Titration of NTG on M9 minimal media supplemented with glycerol (•) or l-lactate (▴).
WT E. coli was grown at 37°C under aerobic conditions. Growth rate was determined by measuring the OD600 of triplicate cultures at several time points and defined as the slope of the linear best-fit line in a plot of ln(OD600) versus time (hours).
Adaptive laboratory evolutions used in this study.
| Evolution | Replicates | GR (h−1) | No. of mutations | Generations | CCD | Ref. | |
| Without NTG | Glycerol | 5 (GA, GB, GC, GD, GE) | 0.64±0.04 | 2–3 | 595±18 | 3.9×1011±0.5×1011 |
|
|
| 6 (LF, LG, LH, LI, LJ, LK) | 0.54±0.04 | 3–8 | 643±75 | 3.8×1011±0.1×1011 |
| |
|
| 3 (PA, PB, PC) | 0.35±0.04 | 6 (PA) | 546±21 | 3.9×1011±0.3×1011 |
| |
| Glucose | 3 (ECOM31, ECOM32, ECOM33) | 0.43±0.01 | N/A | 648±10 | 2.4×1011±0.2×1011 |
| |
| With NTG | Glycerol | 2 (GM1, GM2) | 0.74 | 517 (GM1) | 252±12 | 0.93×1011±0.01×1011 | This study |
|
| 2 (LM1, LM2) | 0.62 | 167 (LM1) | 447±37 | 2.2×1011±0.9×1011 | This study | |
|
| 3 (PM1, PM2, PM3) | 0.64±0.01 | 54–152 | 335±85 | 0.51×1011±0.01×1011 | This study | |
GR, average stable growth rate for each condition, the endpoint culture and previous two recorded growth rates from each parallel evolution were considered in the average; N/A, not available; No. of mutations were determined by whole genome-sequencing; Generations, averaged cumulative number of generations of individual populations required for a stable phenotype to be reached; CCD, averaged cumulative number of cell divisions of individual evolved populations required for a stable phenotype to be achieved. The standard deviation of GRs for glycerol- and l-lactate-evolved populations with NTG was less than 1% of the mean values.
Figure 3Replicate ALE of WT E. coli strains during adaptation to the three-carbon compounds (glycerol, l-lactate, and l-1,2-PDO) and glucose.
The relative growth rate is used as a fitness criteria; i.e., growth rates are normalized to the final observed growth rates of the endpoint strains evolved without the mutagen NTG under a given selection condition. Outliers were excluded using the plotting software SigmaPlot after setting an upper and lower outlier boundary for each data set. (A) Evolution of WT E. coli on glycerol. Replicate ALEs were conducted without NTG (GA, GB, GC, GD, GE) [13] and with 5 µg/ml NTG (GM1, GM2). (B) Evolution of WT E. coli on l-lactate. l-Lactate-evolved strain without NTG (LF, LG, LH, LI, LJ, LK) [13] or with NTG (LM1, LM2). (C) Evolution of WT E. coli on l-1,2-PDO. The l-1,2-PDO-evolved E. coli strains of PA, PB, and PC were generated previously through ALE (PA, PB, PC) [8]. In this study, we have generated the l-1,2-PDO-evovled E. coli (PM1, PM2, PM3) under continuous exposure to NTG during ALE. The arrows indicate cells growing solely on l-1,2-PDO and no glycerol was added to support growth. (D) Evolution of ECOM3 strains on glucose. Cytochrome oxidases-deficient E. coli mutants were previously reported to produce d-lactic acid from glucose under aerobic conditions [15]. Three replicate ALEs (denoted by ECOM31, ECOM32, and ECOM33) were conducted to adapt the parental ECOM3 strain to growth on M9 minimal medium with glucose as the sole carbon source. The arrow indicates cells growing solely on glucose and no amino acid supplement was added to support growth.
Figure 4Venn diagram of mutations shared between the evolved strains with and without NTG.
Surface areas are not proportional to members contained in each set. Light blue and purple circle represents the mutations found in total number of strains evolved with and without NTG, respectively. The single nucleotide differences between the evolved strains with NTG and the parental WT E. coli reference strain are described in Table S1. Whole-genome sequencing of ALE endpoint strains evolved on glycerol, l-lactate, and l-1,2-PDO without NTG has been previously reported [4], [6], [8]. The ylbE1 gene of l-1,2-PDO-evolved E. coli without NTG had two mutations [8].