| Literature DB >> 26022256 |
Mahmoud Gargouri1, Jeong-Jin Park1, F Omar Holguin2, Min-Jeong Kim1, Hongxia Wang3, Rahul R Deshpande4, Yair Shachar-Hill4, Leslie M Hicks5, David R Gang6.
Abstract
Microalgae-based biofuels are promising sources of alternative energy, but improvements throughout the production process are required to establish them as economically feasible. One of the most influential improvements would be a significant increase in lipid yields, which could be achieved by altering the regulation of lipid biosynthesis and accumulation. Chlamydomonas reinhardtii accumulates oil (triacylglycerols, TAG) in response to nitrogen (N) deprivation. Although a few important regulatory genes have been identified that are involved in controlling this process, a global understanding of the larger regulatory network has not been developed. In order to uncover this network in this species, a combined omics (transcriptomic, proteomic and metabolomic) analysis was applied to cells grown in a time course experiment after a shift from N-replete to N-depleted conditions. Changes in transcript and protein levels of 414 predicted transcription factors (TFs) and transcriptional regulators (TRs) were monitored relative to other genes. The TF and TR genes were thus classified by two separate measures: up-regulated versus down-regulated and early response versus late response relative to two phases of polar lipid synthesis (before and after TAG biosynthesis initiation). Lipidomic and primary metabolite profiling generated compound accumulation levels that were integrated with the transcript dataset and TF profiling to produce a transcriptional regulatory network. Evaluation of this proposed regulatory network led to the identification of several regulatory hubs that control many aspects of cellular metabolism, from N assimilation and metabolism, to central metabolism, photosynthesis and lipid metabolism.Entities:
Keywords: Biofuel; Chlamydomonas reinhardtii; RNA-seq; metabolomics; network analysis; proteomics; regulatory hubs; transcription factors; transcriptional regulators.
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26022256 PMCID: PMC4507760 DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erv217
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Bot ISSN: 0022-0957 Impact factor: 6.992
Fig. 1.Establishment of correlation networks for identification of transcriptional regulatory candidates. (A) Overview of the experimental design used to identify the correlation regulatory networks in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii cw15 grown under N deprivation stress and sampled using different ‘omic’ datasets obtained at multiple time points. (B) Distribution of TF and TR family members that displayed correlations with genes involved in different biological processes and that were differentially expressed in Chlamydomonas during N deprivation. Y-axis values indicate the number of genes from each TF and TR family (indicated on the X-axis) that were highly correlated from different biological processes, indicated by colour. Only those correlations that in absolute value were not smaller than 0.9 were used to generate this figure. See Supplementary Table S3 for details of the specific genes used to generate this graph. (C) Transcriptomic and proteomic profiling of the 70 TFs/TRs that were common to the two sets of correlation analysis, TFs/TRs versus metabolites and TFs/TRs versus genes. Heat maps show the expression level of transcripts and the accumulation of proteins for each identified TF/TR during the N deprivation time course. The transcript expression levels are presented as log base-2 fold change relative to time zero. The protein accumulation values are presented as a ratio relative to 1. The data are classified in two groups: ‘up-regulated’ (green) and ‘down-regulated’ (red). Each group was sub-classified into three sub-groups: ‘early response’, ‘late response’ and ‘unaltered’ based on pattern of expression relative to the onset of the accumulation of TAG. BTS (Before TAG Synthesis) corresponds to the time period 0.5–4h for early responses and ATS (After TAG Synthesis initiation) corresponds to 6–24h for later responses.
Fig. 2.Visualization of the nitrogen metabolism regulatory network in Chlamydomonas during N deprivation that included 67 metabolism-related genes and the 70 TFs/TRs that were differentially expressed. Inset (A): The subnetwork that included TF/TR genes that showed the highest correlations during the early phase (1–4h) with genes involved in the assimilation and transport of inorganic N. Inset (B): The subnetwork that included TF/TR genes that were highly correlated during the later phase (6–24h) with genes required for assimilation of organic N. Nodes: TFs/TRs are represented by pink circles (for the early responders), green circles (for late responders) and yellow circles (for those with a different response). Metabolism-related genes are represented by blue squares. Lines connecting two nodes represent significant correlations: red represents a positive correlation and blue represents a negative correlation. See Supplementary Table S3 for details on genes included in this analysis.
Fig. 3.Visualization of the lipid metabolism regulatory networks in Chlamydomonas during N deprivation that included 152 lipid metabolism-related genes and the 70 TFs/TRs that were differentially expressed. (A) The subnetwork that included TF/TR genes that showed the highest correlations during the BTS phase (0.5–4h) with many lipases and a subset of genes involved in membrane lipid biosynthesis. (B) The subnetwork that included TF/TR genes that were highly correlated during the ATS phase (6–24h) with TAG and its related biosynthetic genes. Nodes: TFs/TRs as in Fig. 2. Metabolism-related genes are represented by olive-coloured squares. Lines indicating significance as in Fig. 2. See Supplementary Dataset S1 and Supplementary Fig. S6 for details on genes included in this analysis. (C) Visualization of protein expression levels of regulatory hubs in WT after 48h of N deprivation, tab2 mutant at time 0 and tab2 mutant after 48h of N deprivation, all relative to WT at time 0.
The top five regulatory hubs for specific phases in the response of Chlamydomonas to N deprivation
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metabolic pathway regulated | VARL12 | HB2 | GNAT1 | bHLH9 | GNAT7 | FHA10 | CSD1 | AP2-15 | MYBL13 | SBP8 | RWP1 | RWP10 | TAZ2 | MYBL5 | GATA11 |
| Photosynthesis | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | |||
| Nitrogen | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | ||||
| Chlorophyll biosynthesis | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | ||||
| Photorespiration | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | ||||||
| OPPP | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | |||||||
| Calvin cycle | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | ||||||
| Carbohydrates | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | |||||||
| Central metabolism | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | ||||||
| Amino acids | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | ||
| Lipids | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | |||
| Degree of centrality | 67 | 74 | 25 | 40 | 45 | 56 | 46 | 26 | 25 | 32 | 60 | 55 | 59 | 36 | 64 |
Fig. 4.Model of how Chlamydomonas responds to N deprivation (A) during the BTS phase (0.5–4h) and (B) ATS phase (6–24h). Pathways highlighted in red contain genes, proteins and metabolites significantly up-regulated; those in blue contain genes, proteins and metabolites significantly down-regulated; and those in black do not display significant change. Abbreviations: S/D, ratio of synthesis/degradation; I/O, ratio of inorganic/organic N; LD, lipid droplets; PL, polar lipids; N/PL, non- and polar lipids; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; PDC, pyruvate dehydrogenase complex; PSI, photosystem I; PSII, photosystem II. The association of putative transcription factors (TFs) with each state is depicted in pie charts; sizes are proportional to the total number of correlations detected. TFs that were significantly enriched under those conditions are listed in two boxes, with abbreviations defined in the text or in Supplementary Dataset S1.