Literature DB >> 30298551

Power and sample size requirements for GEE analyses of cluster randomized crossover trials.

Fan Li1,2, Andrew B Forbes3, Elizabeth L Turner1,4, John S Preisser5.   

Abstract

The cluster randomized crossover design has been proposed to improve efficiency over the traditional parallel cluster randomized design, which often involves a limited number of clusters. In recent years, the cluster randomized crossover design has been increasingly used to evaluate the effectiveness of health care policy or programs, and the interest often lies in quantifying the population-averaged intervention effect. In this paper, we consider the two-treatment two-period crossover design, and develop sample size procedures for continuous and binary outcomes corresponding to a population-averaged model estimated by generalized estimating equations, accounting for both within-period and interperiod correlations. In particular, we show that the required sample size depends on the correlation parameters through an eigenvalue of the within-cluster correlation matrix for continuous outcomes and through two distinct eigenvalues of the correlation matrix for binary outcomes. We demonstrate that the empirical power corresponds well with the predicted power by the proposed formulae for as few as eight clusters, when outcomes are analyzed using the matrix-adjusted estimating equations for the correlation parameters concurrently with a suitable bias-corrected sandwich variance estimator.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cluster randomized trials; crossover; finite-sample correction; generalized estimating equations (GEE); matrix-adjusted estimating equations (MAEEs); sandwich variance estimator

Year:  2018        PMID: 30298551      PMCID: PMC6461037          DOI: 10.1002/sim.7995

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  33 in total

1.  Small-sample adjustments for Wald-type tests using sandwich estimators.

Authors:  M P Fay; B I Graubard
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Marginally specified logistic-normal models for longitudinal binary data.

Authors:  P J Heagerty
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Methods to reduce the impact of intraclass correlation in group-randomized trials.

Authors:  David M Murray; Jonathan L Blistein
Journal:  Eval Rev       Date:  2003-02

4.  The importance and role of intracluster correlations in planning cluster trials.

Authors:  John S Preisser; Beth A Reboussin; Eun-Young Song; Mark Wolfson
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.822

Review 5.  Review of Recent Methodological Developments in Group-Randomized Trials: Part 1-Design.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Turner; Fan Li; John A Gallis; Melanie Prague; David M Murray
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Relative efficiency of unequal versus equal cluster sizes in cluster randomized trials using generalized estimating equation models.

Authors:  Jingxia Liu; Graham A Colditz
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2018-03-25       Impact factor: 2.207

7.  Sample size considerations for GEE analyses of three-level cluster randomized trials.

Authors:  Steven Teerenstra; Bing Lu; John S Preisser; Theo van Achterberg; George F Borm
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Understanding the cluster randomised crossover design: a graphical illustraton of the components of variation and a sample size tutorial.

Authors:  Sarah J Arnup; Joanne E McKenzie; Karla Hemming; David Pilcher; Andrew B Forbes
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  A randomised trial of point-of-care tests for chlamydia and gonorrhoea infections in remote Aboriginal communities: Test, Treat ANd GO- the "TTANGO" trial protocol.

Authors:  Rebecca J Guy; Lisa Natoli; James Ward; Louise Causer; Belinda Hengel; David Whiley; Sepehr N Tabrizi; Basil Donovan; Christopher K Fairley; Steven B Badman; Annie Tangey; Handan Wand; Mark Shephard; David G Regan; David Wilson; David Anderson; John M Kaldor
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 3.090

10.  Intra-cluster and inter-period correlation coefficients for cross-sectional cluster randomised controlled trials for type-2 diabetes in UK primary care.

Authors:  James Martin; Alan Girling; Krishnarajah Nirantharakumar; Ronan Ryan; Tom Marshall; Karla Hemming
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 2.279

View more
  14 in total

1.  Commentary: Right truncation in cluster randomized trials can attenuate the power of a marginal analysis.

Authors:  Fan Li; Michael O Harhay
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  Sample size requirements for detecting treatment effect heterogeneity in cluster randomized trials.

Authors:  Siyun Yang; Fan Li; Monique A Starks; Adrian F Hernandez; Robert J Mentz; Kingshuk R Choudhury
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Statistical Considerations for Embedded Pragmatic Clinical Trials in People Living with Dementia.

Authors:  Heather G Allore; Keith S Goldfeld; Roee Gutman; Fan Li; Joan K Monin; Monica Taljaard; Thomas G Travison
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  Sample size considerations for stepped wedge designs with subclusters.

Authors:  Kendra Davis-Plourde; Monica Taljaard; Fan Li
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2021-10-31       Impact factor: 1.701

5.  Power considerations for generalized estimating equations analyses of four-level cluster randomized trials.

Authors:  Xueqi Wang; Elizabeth L Turner; John S Preisser; Fan Li
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 1.715

6.  Design and analysis considerations for cohort stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with a decay correlation structure.

Authors:  Fan Li
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  xtgeebcv: A command for bias-corrected sandwich variance estimation for GEE analyses of cluster randomized trials.

Authors:  John A Gallis; Fan Li; Elizabeth L Turner
Journal:  Stata J       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 2.637

8.  Sample size estimation for modified Poisson analysis of cluster randomized trials with a binary outcome.

Authors:  Fan Li; Guangyu Tong
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 2.494

9.  Sample size and power considerations for cluster randomized trials with count outcomes subject to right truncation.

Authors:  Fan Li; Guangyu Tong
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 1.715

10.  Impact of unequal cluster sizes for GEE analyses of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes.

Authors:  Zibo Tian; John S Preisser; Denise Esserman; Elizabeth L Turner; Paul J Rathouz; Fan Li
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 1.715

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.