Literature DB >> 33826454

Sample size estimation for modified Poisson analysis of cluster randomized trials with a binary outcome.

Fan Li1,2,3, Guangyu Tong1,3.   

Abstract

The modified Poisson regression coupled with a robust sandwich variance has become a viable alternative to log-binomial regression for estimating the marginal relative risk in cluster randomized trials. However, a corresponding sample size formula for relative risk regression via the modified Poisson model is currently not available for cluster randomized trials. Through analytical derivations, we show that there is no loss of asymptotic efficiency for estimating the marginal relative risk via the modified Poisson regression relative to the log-binomial regression. This finding holds both under the independence working correlation and under the exchangeable working correlation provided a simple modification is used to obtain the consistent intraclass correlation coefficient estimate. Therefore, the sample size formulas developed for log-binomial regression naturally apply to the modified Poisson regression in cluster randomized trials. We further extend the sample size formulas to accommodate variable cluster sizes. An extensive Monte Carlo simulation study is carried out to validate the proposed formulas. We find that the proposed formulas have satisfactory performance across a range of cluster size variability, as long as suitable finite-sample corrections are applied to the sandwich variance estimator and the number of clusters is at least 10. Our findings also suggest that the sample size estimate under the exchangeable working correlation is more robust to cluster size variability, and recommend the use of an exchangeable working correlation over an independence working correlation for both design and analysis. The proposed sample size formulas are illustrated using the Stop Colorectal Cancer (STOP CRC) trial.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intraclass correlation coefficients; log-binomial regression; modified Poisson regression; pragmatic clinical trials; relative risk; variable cluster sizes

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33826454      PMCID: PMC9132618          DOI: 10.1177/0962280221990415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res        ISSN: 0962-2802            Impact factor:   2.494


  42 in total

1.  A covariance estimator for GEE with improved small-sample properties.

Authors:  L A Mancl; T A DeRouen
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Small-sample adjustments for Wald-type tests using sandwich estimators.

Authors:  M P Fay; B I Graubard
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data.

Authors:  Guangyong Zou
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  A comparison of two bias-corrected covariance estimators for generalized estimating equations.

Authors:  Bing Lu; John S Preisser; Bahjat F Qaqish; Chirayath Suchindran; Shrikant I Bangdiwala; Mark Wolfson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  Review of Recent Methodological Developments in Group-Randomized Trials: Part 1-Design.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Turner; Fan Li; John A Gallis; Melanie Prague; David M Murray
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Commentary: Right truncation in cluster randomized trials can attenuate the power of a marginal analysis.

Authors:  Fan Li; Michael O Harhay
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 7.196

7.  An evaluation of constrained randomization for the design and analysis of group-randomized trials with binary outcomes.

Authors:  Fan Li; Elizabeth L Turner; Patrick J Heagerty; David M Murray; William M Vollmer; Elizabeth R DeLong
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Strategies and Opportunities to STOP Colon Cancer in Priority Populations: design of a cluster-randomized pragmatic trial.

Authors:  Gloria D Coronado; William M Vollmer; Amanda Petrik; Stephen H Taplin; Timothy E Burdick; Richard T Meenan; Beverly B Green
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 2.226

9.  Covariance estimators for generalized estimating equations (GEE) in longitudinal analysis with small samples.

Authors:  Ming Wang; Lan Kong; Zheng Li; Lijun Zhang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  xtgeebcv: A command for bias-corrected sandwich variance estimation for GEE analyses of cluster randomized trials.

Authors:  John A Gallis; Fan Li; Elizabeth L Turner
Journal:  Stata J       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 2.637

View more
  1 in total

1.  Impact of unequal cluster sizes for GEE analyses of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes.

Authors:  Zibo Tian; John S Preisser; Denise Esserman; Elizabeth L Turner; Paul J Rathouz; Fan Li
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 1.715

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.