| Literature DB >> 28426295 |
Elizabeth L Turner1, Fan Li1, John A Gallis1, Melanie Prague1, David M Murray1.
Abstract
In 2004, Murray et al. reviewed methodological developments in the design and analysis of group-randomized trials (GRTs). We have highlighted the developments of the past 13 years in design with a companion article to focus on developments in analysis. As a pair, these articles update the 2004 review. We have discussed developments in the topics of the earlier review (e.g., clustering, matching, and individually randomized group-treatment trials) and in new topics, including constrained randomization and a range of randomized designs that are alternatives to the standard parallel-arm GRT. These include the stepped-wedge GRT, the pseudocluster randomized trial, and the network-randomized GRT, which, like the parallel-arm GRT, require clustering to be accounted for in both their design and analysis.Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28426295 PMCID: PMC5425852 DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303706
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Public Health ISSN: 0090-0036 Impact factor: 9.308