Literature DB >> 35330784

xtgeebcv: A command for bias-corrected sandwich variance estimation for GEE analyses of cluster randomized trials.

John A Gallis1, Fan Li2, Elizabeth L Turner1.   

Abstract

Cluster randomized trials, where clusters (for example, schools or clinics) are randomized to comparison arms but measurements are taken on individuals, are commonly used to evaluate interventions in public health, education, and the social sciences. Analysis is often conducted on individual-level outcomes, and such analysis methods must consider that outcomes for members of the same cluster tend to be more similar than outcomes for members of other clusters. A popular individual-level analysis technique is generalized estimating equations (GEE). However, it is common to randomize a small number of clusters (for example, 30 or fewer), and in this case, the GEE standard errors obtained from the sandwich variance estimator will be biased, leading to inflated type I errors. Some bias-corrected standard errors have been proposed and studied to account for this finite-sample bias, but none has yet been implemented in Stata. In this article, we describe several popular bias corrections to the robust sandwich variance. We then introduce our newly created command, xtgeebcv, which will allow Stata users to easily apply finite-sample corrections to standard errors obtained from GEE models. We then provide examples to demonstrate the use of xtgeebcv. Finally, we discuss suggestions about which finite-sample corrections to use in which situations and consider areas of future research that may improve xtgeebcv.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bias-corrected variances; cluster randomized trials; finite-sample correction; generalized estimating equations; sandwich variance; st0599; xtgeebcv

Year:  2020        PMID: 35330784      PMCID: PMC8942127          DOI: 10.1177/1536867x20931001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stata J        ISSN: 1536-867X            Impact factor:   2.637


  21 in total

1.  A covariance estimator for GEE with improved small-sample properties.

Authors:  L A Mancl; T A DeRouen
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Small-sample adjustments for Wald-type tests using sandwich estimators.

Authors:  M P Fay; B I Graubard
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  Review of Recent Methodological Developments in Group-Randomized Trials: Part 1-Design.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Turner; Fan Li; John A Gallis; Melanie Prague; David M Murray
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Improved standard error estimator for maintaining the validity of inference in cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters.

Authors:  Whitney P Ford; Philip M Westgate
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 2.207

5.  Small sample performance of bias-corrected sandwich estimators for cluster-randomized trials with binary outcomes.

Authors:  Peng Li; David T Redden
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Correlated binary regression with covariates specific to each binary observation.

Authors:  R L Prentice
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Sample size considerations for GEE analyses of three-level cluster randomized trials.

Authors:  Steven Teerenstra; Bing Lu; John S Preisser; Theo van Achterberg; George F Borm
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Covariance estimators for generalized estimating equations (GEE) in longitudinal analysis with small samples.

Authors:  Ming Wang; Lan Kong; Zheng Li; Lijun Zhang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Biological and behavioural impact of an adolescent sexual health intervention in Tanzania: a community-randomized trial.

Authors:  David A Ross; John Changalucha; Angela In Obasi; Jim Todd; Mary L Plummer; Bernadette Cleophas-Mazige; Alessandra Anemona; Dean Everett; Helen A Weiss; David C Mabey; Heiner Grosskurth; Richard J Hayes
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 4.177

10.  The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the peer-delivered Thinking Healthy Programme for perinatal depression in Pakistan and India: the SHARE study protocol for randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Siham Sikander; Anisha Lazarus; Omer Bangash; Daniela C Fuhr; Benedict Weobong; Revathi N Krishna; Ikhlaq Ahmad; Helen A Weiss; LeShawndra Price; Atif Rahman; Vikram Patel
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.279

View more
  3 in total

1.  Sample size estimation for modified Poisson analysis of cluster randomized trials with a binary outcome.

Authors:  Fan Li; Guangyu Tong
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 2.494

2.  Sample size and power considerations for cluster randomized trials with count outcomes subject to right truncation.

Authors:  Fan Li; Guangyu Tong
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 1.715

3.  Cluster randomised trials with a binary outcome and a small number of clusters: comparison of individual and cluster level analysis method.

Authors:  Jennifer A Thompson; Clemence Leyrat; Katherine L Fielding; Richard J Hayes
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 4.612

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.