Literature DB >> 20070297

Sample size considerations for GEE analyses of three-level cluster randomized trials.

Steven Teerenstra1, Bing Lu, John S Preisser, Theo van Achterberg, George F Borm.   

Abstract

Cluster randomized trials in health care may involve three instead of two levels, for instance, in trials where different interventions to improve quality of care are compared. In such trials, the intervention is implemented in health care units ("clusters") and aims at changing the behavior of health care professionals working in this unit ("subjects"), while the effects are measured at the patient level ("evaluations"). Within the generalized estimating equations approach, we derive a sample size formula that accounts for two levels of clustering: that of subjects within clusters and that of evaluations within subjects. The formula reveals that sample size is inflated, relative to a design with completely independent evaluations, by a multiplicative term that can be expressed as a product of two variance inflation factors, one that quantifies the impact of within-subject correlation of evaluations on the variance of subject-level means and the other that quantifies the impact of the correlation between subject-level means on the variance of the cluster means. Power levels as predicted by the sample size formula agreed well with the simulated power for more than 10 clusters in total, when data were analyzed using bias-corrected estimating equations for the correlation parameters in combination with the model-based covariance estimator or the sandwich estimator with a finite sample correction.
© 2010, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20070297      PMCID: PMC2896994          DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01374.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  22 in total

1.  A covariance estimator for GEE with improved small-sample properties.

Authors:  L A Mancl; T A DeRouen
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Small-sample adjustments for Wald-type tests using sandwich estimators.

Authors:  M P Fay; B I Graubard
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Marginally specified logistic-normal models for longitudinal binary data.

Authors:  P J Heagerty
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  An integrated population-averaged approach to the design, analysis and sample size determination of cluster-unit trials.

Authors:  John S Preisser; Mary L Young; Daniel J Zaccaro; Mark Wolfson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2003-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Small-sample adjustments in using the sandwich variance estimator in generalized estimating equations.

Authors:  Wei Pan; Melanie M Wall
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Methods to reduce the impact of intraclass correlation in group-randomized trials.

Authors:  David M Murray; Jonathan L Blistein
Journal:  Eval Rev       Date:  2003-02

7.  Performance of weighted estimating equations for longitudinal binary data with drop-outs missing at random.

Authors:  John S Preisser; Kurt K Lohman; Paul J Rathouz
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-10-30       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  The importance and role of intracluster correlations in planning cluster trials.

Authors:  John S Preisser; Beth A Reboussin; Eun-Young Song; Mark Wolfson
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.822

9.  Statistical power and sample size requirements for three level hierarchical cluster randomized trials.

Authors:  Moonseong Heo; Andrew C Leon
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Sample size calculations for 3-level cluster randomized trials.

Authors:  Steven Teerenstra; Mirjam Moerbeek; Theo van Achterberg; Ben J Pelzer; George F Borm
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.486

View more
  26 in total

1.  Finite-sample corrected generalized estimating equation of population average treatment effects in stepped wedge cluster randomized trials.

Authors:  JoAnna M Scott; Allan deCamp; Michal Juraska; Michael P Fay; Peter B Gilbert
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 3.021

Review 2.  Review of Recent Methodological Developments in Group-Randomized Trials: Part 1-Design.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Turner; Fan Li; John A Gallis; Melanie Prague; David M Murray
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Small sample performance of bias-corrected sandwich estimators for cluster-randomized trials with binary outcomes.

Authors:  Peng Li; David T Redden
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Optimal designs in three-level cluster randomized trials with a binary outcome.

Authors:  Jingxia Liu; Lei Liu; Graham A Colditz
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 5.  Review of Recent Methodological Developments in Group-Randomized Trials: Part 2-Analysis.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Turner; Melanie Prague; John A Gallis; Fan Li; David M Murray
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 6.  Statistical Approaches to Longitudinal Data Analysis in Neurodegenerative Diseases: Huntington's Disease as a Model.

Authors:  Tanya P Garcia; Karen Marder
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.081

7.  Sample size considerations for split-mouth design.

Authors:  Hong Zhu; Song Zhang; Chul Ahn
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 3.021

8.  Sample size estimation for alternating logistic regressions analysis of multilevel randomized community trials of under-age drinking.

Authors:  Beth A Reboussin; John S Preisser; Eun-Young Song; Mark Wolfson
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 2.483

9.  Design and analysis considerations for cohort stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with a decay correlation structure.

Authors:  Fan Li
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Power and sample size requirements for GEE analyses of cluster randomized crossover trials.

Authors:  Fan Li; Andrew B Forbes; Elizabeth L Turner; John S Preisser
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.