Literature DB >> 32823372

Sample size requirements for detecting treatment effect heterogeneity in cluster randomized trials.

Siyun Yang1, Fan Li2,3, Monique A Starks4,5, Adrian F Hernandez4,5, Robert J Mentz4,5, Kingshuk R Choudhury1.   

Abstract

Cluster randomized trials (CRTs) refer to experiments with randomization carried out at the cluster or the group level. While numerous statistical methods have been developed for the design and analysis of CRTs, most of the existing methods focused on testing the overall treatment effect across the population characteristics, with few discussions on the differential treatment effect among subpopulations. In addition, the sample size and power requirements for detecting differential treatment effect in CRTs remain unclear, but are helpful for studies planned with such an objective. In this article, we develop a new sample size formula for detecting treatment effect heterogeneity in two-level CRTs for continuous outcomes, continuous or binary covariates measured at cluster or individual level. We also investigate the roles of two intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs): the adjusted ICC for the outcome of interest and the marginal ICC for the covariate of interest. We further derive a closed-form design effect formula to facilitate the application of the proposed method, and provide extensions to accommodate multiple covariates. Extensive simulations are carried out to validate the proposed formula in finite samples. We find that the empirical power agrees well with the prediction across a range of parameter constellations, when data are analyzed by a linear mixed effects model with a treatment-by-covariate interaction. Finally, we use data from the HF-ACTION study to illustrate the proposed sample size procedure for detecting heterogeneous treatment effects.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cluster randomized trials; heterogeneous treatment effect; interaction; intraclass correlation coefficient; power formula; sample size estimation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32823372      PMCID: PMC7948251          DOI: 10.1002/sim.8721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  38 in total

Review 1.  Lessons for cluster randomized trials in the twenty-first century: a systematic review of trials in primary care.

Authors:  Sandra M Eldridge; Deborah Ashby; Gene S Feder; Alicja R Rudnicka; Obioha C Ukoumunne
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.486

2.  Sample size for a two-group comparison of repeated binary measurements using GEE.

Authors:  Sin-Ho Jung; Chul W Ahn
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 3.  Review of Recent Methodological Developments in Group-Randomized Trials: Part 1-Design.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Turner; Fan Li; John A Gallis; Melanie Prague; David M Murray
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 4.  Tests for interaction in epidemiologic studies: a review and a study of power.

Authors:  S Greenland
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1983 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Randomization by cluster. Sample size requirements and analysis.

Authors:  A Donner; N Birkett; C Buck
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Statistical lessons learned for designing cluster randomized pragmatic clinical trials from the NIH Health Care Systems Collaboratory Biostatistics and Design Core.

Authors:  Andrea J Cook; Elizabeth Delong; David M Murray; William M Vollmer; Patrick J Heagerty
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 2.486

7.  Efficacy and safety of exercise training in patients with chronic heart failure: HF-ACTION randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Christopher M O'Connor; David J Whellan; Kerry L Lee; Steven J Keteyian; Lawton S Cooper; Stephen J Ellis; Eric S Leifer; William E Kraus; Dalane W Kitzman; James A Blumenthal; David S Rendall; Nancy Houston Miller; Jerome L Fleg; Kevin A Schulman; Robert S McKelvie; Faiez Zannad; Ileana L Piña
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Design and analysis considerations for cohort stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with a decay correlation structure.

Authors:  Fan Li
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Methods for sample size determination in cluster randomized trials.

Authors:  Clare Rutterford; Andrew Copas; Sandra Eldridge
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 7.196

10.  Pragmatic clinical trials embedded in healthcare systems: generalizable lessons from the NIH Collaboratory.

Authors:  Kevin P Weinfurt; Adrian F Hernandez; Gloria D Coronado; Lynn L DeBar; Laura M Dember; Beverly B Green; Patrick J Heagerty; Susan S Huang; Kathryn T James; Jeffrey G Jarvik; Eric B Larson; Vincent Mor; Richard Platt; Gary E Rosenthal; Edward J Septimus; Gregory E Simon; Karen L Staman; Jeremy Sugarman; Miguel Vazquez; Douglas Zatzick; Lesley H Curtis
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  1 in total

1.  Sample size calculation in hierarchical 2 × 2 factorial trials with unequal cluster sizes.

Authors:  Zizhong Tian; Denise Esserman; Guangyu Tong; Ondrej Blaha; James Dziura; Peter Peduzzi; Fan Li
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2022-01-02       Impact factor: 2.373

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.