Literature DB >> 30287420

Right time, right place-DNA damage and DNA replication checkpoints collectively safeguard S phase.

Lorenzo Galanti1, Boris Pfander1.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30287420      PMCID: PMC6213279          DOI: 10.15252/embj.2018100681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO J        ISSN: 0261-4189            Impact factor:   11.598


× No keyword cloud information.
  15 in total

1.  Mrc1 transduces signals of DNA replication stress to activate Rad53.

Authors:  A A Alcasabas; A J Osborn; J Bachant; F Hu; P J Werler; K Bousset; K Furuya; J F Diffley; A M Carr; S J Elledge
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 28.824

2.  The RAD6 DNA damage tolerance pathway operates uncoupled from the replication fork and is functional beyond S phase.

Authors:  Georgios I Karras; Stefan Jentsch
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Multiple mechanisms control chromosome integrity after replication fork uncoupling and restart at irreparable UV lesions.

Authors:  Massimo Lopes; Marco Foiani; José M Sogo
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2006-01-06       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 4.  The checkpoint response to replication stress.

Authors:  Dana Branzei; Marco Foiani
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2009-05-23

5.  Mrc1 and Rad9 cooperate to regulate initiation and elongation of DNA replication in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  Julien Bacal; María Moriel-Carretero; Benjamin Pardo; Antoine Barthe; Sushma Sharma; Andrei Chabes; Armelle Lengronne; Philippe Pasero
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Redox-sensitive alteration of replisome architecture safeguards genome integrity.

Authors:  Kumar Somyajit; Rajat Gupta; Hana Sedlackova; Kai John Neelsen; Fena Ochs; Maj-Britt Rask; Chunaram Choudhary; Jiri Lukas
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Eukaryotic DNA damage checkpoint activation in response to double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Karen Finn; Noel Francis Lowndes; Muriel Grenon
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 9.261

8.  Activation of Rad53 kinase in response to DNA damage and its effect in modulating phosphorylation of the lagging strand DNA polymerase.

Authors:  A Pellicioli; C Lucca; G Liberi; F Marini; M Lopes; P Plevani; A Romano; P P Di Fiore; M Foiani
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-11-15       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  Ubiquitin-dependent DNA damage bypass is separable from genome replication.

Authors:  Yasukazu Daigaku; Adelina A Davies; Helle D Ulrich
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Checkpoint-dependent phosphorylation of Exo1 modulates the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Isabelle Morin; Hien-Ping Ngo; Amanda Greenall; Mikhajlo K Zubko; Nick Morrice; David Lydall
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  The multi-functionality of UHRF1: epigenome maintenance and preservation of genome integrity.

Authors:  Monica Mancini; Elena Magnani; Filippo Macchi; Ian Marc Bonapace
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 2.  Homologous Recombination: To Fork and Beyond.

Authors:  Félix Prado
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 3.  On the Interplay of the DNA Replication Program and the Intra-S Phase Checkpoint Pathway.

Authors:  Diletta Ciardo; Arach Goldar; Kathrin Marheineke
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 4.096

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.