Literature DB >> 20403322

The RAD6 DNA damage tolerance pathway operates uncoupled from the replication fork and is functional beyond S phase.

Georgios I Karras1, Stefan Jentsch.   

Abstract

Damaged DNA templates provide an obstacle to the replication fork and can cause genome instability. In eukaryotes, tolerance to damaged DNA is mediated largely by the RAD6 pathway involving ubiquitylation of the DNA polymerase processivity factor PCNA. Whereas monoubiquitylation of PCNA mediates error-prone translesion synthesis (TLS), polyubiquitylation triggers an error-free pathway. Both branches of this pathway are believed to occur in S phase in order to ensure replication completion. However, we found that limiting TLS or the error-free pathway to the G2/M phase of the cell-cycle efficiently promote lesion tolerance. Thus, our findings indicate that both branches of the DNA damage tolerance pathway operate effectively after chromosomal replication, outside S phase. We therefore propose that the RAD6 pathway acts on single-stranded gaps left behind newly restarted replication forks. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20403322     DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.02.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell        ISSN: 0092-8674            Impact factor:   41.582


  161 in total

1.  Brc1-dependent recovery from replication stress.

Authors:  Kirstin L Bass; Johanne M Murray; Matthew J O'Connell
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 2.  Ubiquitin signalling in DNA replication and repair.

Authors:  Helle D Ulrich; Helen Walden
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 94.444

3.  The interface between the ubiquitin family and the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Jiri Lukas
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 8.807

4.  Mus81 and Yen1 promote reciprocal exchange during mitotic recombination to maintain genome integrity in budding yeast.

Authors:  Chu Kwen Ho; Gerard Mazón; Alicia F Lam; Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  Damage-specific modification of PCNA.

Authors:  Sapna Das-Bradoo; Hai Dang Nguyen; Anja-Katrin Bielinsky
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 4.534

6.  Fork rotation and DNA precatenation are restricted during DNA replication to prevent chromosomal instability.

Authors:  Stephanie A Schalbetter; Sahar Mansoubi; Anna L Chambers; Jessica A Downs; Jonathan Baxter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Mechanism of DNA damage tolerance.

Authors:  Xin Bi
Journal:  World J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-08-26

Review 8.  DNA replication stress: from molecular mechanisms to human disease.

Authors:  Sergio Muñoz; Juan Méndez
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 4.316

9.  The preference for error-free or error-prone postreplication repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae exposed to low-dose methyl methanesulfonate is cell cycle dependent.

Authors:  Dongqing Huang; Brian D Piening; Amanda G Paulovich
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Genomic assay reveals tolerance of DNA damage by both translesion DNA synthesis and homology-dependent repair in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Lior Izhar; Omer Ziv; Isadora S Cohen; Nicholas E Geacintov; Zvi Livneh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.