Literature DB >> 22083606

Eukaryotic DNA damage checkpoint activation in response to double-strand breaks.

Karen Finn1, Noel Francis Lowndes, Muriel Grenon.   

Abstract

Double-strand breaks (DSBs) are the most detrimental form of DNA damage. Failure to repair these cytotoxic lesions can result in genome rearrangements conducive to the development of many diseases, including cancer. The DNA damage response (DDR) ensures the rapid detection and repair of DSBs in order to maintain genome integrity. Central to the DDR are the DNA damage checkpoints. When activated by DNA damage, these sophisticated surveillance mechanisms induce transient cell cycle arrests, allowing sufficient time for DNA repair. Since the term "checkpoint" was coined over 20 years ago, our understanding of the molecular mechanisms governing the DNA damage checkpoint has advanced significantly. These pathways are highly conserved from yeast to humans. Thus, significant findings in yeast may be extrapolated to vertebrates, greatly facilitating the molecular dissection of these complex regulatory networks. This review focuses on the cellular response to DSBs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, providing a comprehensive overview of how these signalling pathways function to orchestrate the cellular response to DNA damage and preserve genome stability in eukaryotic cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22083606     DOI: 10.1007/s00018-011-0875-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci        ISSN: 1420-682X            Impact factor:   9.261


  393 in total

1.  Transient stability of DNA ends allows nonhomologous end joining to precede homologous recombination.

Authors:  Marie Frank-Vaillant; Stéphane Marcand
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 2.  MRN and the race to the break.

Authors:  Agnieszka Rupnik; Noel F Lowndes; Muriel Grenon
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 4.316

3.  Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 A resolution.

Authors:  K Luger; A W Mäder; R K Richmond; D F Sargent; T J Richmond
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-09-18       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint.

Authors:  J A Tercero; J F Diffley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-08-02       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Regulation of DNA-replication origins during cell-cycle progression.

Authors:  K Shirahige; Y Hori; K Shiraishi; M Yamashita; K Takahashi; C Obuse; T Tsurimoto; H Yoshikawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-10-08       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  TopBP1 activates ATR through ATRIP and a PIKK regulatory domain.

Authors:  Daniel A Mordes; Gloria G Glick; Runxiang Zhao; David Cortez
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2008-06-01       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  mik1+ encodes a tyrosine kinase that phosphorylates p34cdc2 on tyrosine 15.

Authors:  M S Lee; T Enoch; H Piwnica-Worms
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1994-12-02       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Cell cycle regulation of DNA double-strand break end resection by Cdk1-dependent Dna2 phosphorylation.

Authors:  Xuefeng Chen; Hengyao Niu; Woo-Hyun Chung; Zhu Zhu; Alma Papusha; Eun Yong Shim; Sang Eun Lee; Patrick Sung; Grzegorz Ira
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2011-08-14       Impact factor: 15.369

9.  An FHA domain-mediated protein interaction network of Rad53 reveals its role in polarized cell growth.

Authors:  Marcus B Smolka; Sheng-hong Chen; Paul S Maddox; Jorrit M Enserink; Claudio P Albuquerque; Xiao X Wei; Arshad Desai; Richard D Kolodner; Huilin Zhou
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2006-11-27       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Activation of the phosphatase activity of human cdc25A by a cdk2-cyclin E dependent phosphorylation at the G1/S transition.

Authors:  I Hoffmann; G Draetta; E Karsenti
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1994-09-15       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  60 in total

1.  Sae2 antagonizes Rad9 accumulation at DNA double-strand breaks to attenuate checkpoint signaling and facilitate end resection.

Authors:  Tai-Yuan Yu; Michael T Kimble; Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Cohesin and the nucleolus constrain the mobility of spontaneous repair foci.

Authors:  Vincent Dion; Véronique Kalck; Andrew Seeber; Thomas Schleker; Susan M Gasser
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 8.807

3.  Mcm2-7 Is an Active Player in the DNA Replication Checkpoint Signaling Cascade via Proposed Modulation of Its DNA Gate.

Authors:  Feng-Ling Tsai; Sriram Vijayraghavan; Joseph Prinz; Heather K MacAlpine; David M MacAlpine; Anthony Schwacha
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  The Slx4-Dpb11 scaffold complex: coordinating the response to replication fork stalling in S-phase and the subsequent mitosis.

Authors:  Lissa N Princz; Dalia Gritenaite; Boris Pfander
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 5.  Right time, right place-DNA damage and DNA replication checkpoints collectively safeguard S phase.

Authors:  Lorenzo Galanti; Boris Pfander
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Mrc1 and Rad9 cooperate to regulate initiation and elongation of DNA replication in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  Julien Bacal; María Moriel-Carretero; Benjamin Pardo; Antoine Barthe; Sushma Sharma; Andrei Chabes; Armelle Lengronne; Philippe Pasero
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 7.  The ATM protein kinase: regulating the cellular response to genotoxic stress, and more.

Authors:  Yosef Shiloh; Yael Ziv
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 94.444

8.  Rad51-dependent aberrant chromosome structures at telomeres and ribosomal DNA activate the spindle assembly checkpoint.

Authors:  Akemi Nakano; Kenta Masuda; Taisuke Hiromoto; Katsunori Takahashi; Yoshitake Matsumoto; Ahmed G K Habib; Ahmed G G Darwish; Masashi Yukawa; Eiko Tsuchiya; Masaru Ueno
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Unrepaired DNA damage facilitates elimination of uniparental chromosomes in interspecific hybrid cells.

Authors:  Zheng Wang; Hao Yin; Lei Lv; Yingying Feng; Shaopeng Chen; Junting Liang; Yun Huang; Xiaohua Jiang; Hanwei Jiang; Ihtisham Bukhari; Lijun Wu; Howard J Cooke; Qinghua Shi
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 4.534

10.  Tipin functions in the protection against topoisomerase I inhibitor.

Authors:  Yoshifumi Hosono; Takuya Abe; Masato Higuchi; Kosa Kajii; Shuichi Sakuraba; Shusuke Tada; Takemi Enomoto; Masayuki Seki
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.