Literature DB >> 30158111

Mrc1 and Rad9 cooperate to regulate initiation and elongation of DNA replication in response to DNA damage.

Julien Bacal1, María Moriel-Carretero1, Benjamin Pardo1, Antoine Barthe1, Sushma Sharma2, Andrei Chabes2, Armelle Lengronne1, Philippe Pasero3.   

Abstract

The S-phase checkpoint maintains the integrity of the genome in response to DNA replication stress. In budding yeast, this pathway is initiated by Mec1 and is amplified through the activation of Rad53 by two checkpoint mediators: Mrc1 promotes Rad53 activation at stalled forks, and Rad9 is a general mediator of the DNA damage response. Here, we have investigated the interplay between Mrc1 and Rad9 in response to DNA damage and found that they control DNA replication through two distinct but complementary mechanisms. Mrc1 rapidly activates Rad53 at stalled forks and represses late-firing origins but is unable to maintain this repression over time. Rad9 takes over Mrc1 to maintain a continuous checkpoint signaling. Importantly, the Rad9-mediated activation of Rad53 slows down fork progression, supporting the view that the S-phase checkpoint controls both the initiation and the elongation of DNA replication in response to DNA damage. Together, these data indicate that Mrc1 and Rad9 play distinct functions that are important to ensure an optimal completion of S phase under replication stress conditions.
© 2018 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA replication; S‐phase checkpoint; elongation; initiation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30158111      PMCID: PMC6213276          DOI: 10.15252/embj.201899319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO J        ISSN: 0261-4189            Impact factor:   11.598


  92 in total

1.  Budding yeast Rad9 is an ATP-dependent Rad53 activating machine.

Authors:  C S Gilbert; C M Green; N F Lowndes
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 2.  Checking on DNA damage in S phase.

Authors:  Jiri Bartek; Claudia Lukas; Jiri Lukas
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 94.444

3.  GINS maintains association of Cdc45 with MCM in replisome progression complexes at eukaryotic DNA replication forks.

Authors:  Agnieszka Gambus; Richard C Jones; Alberto Sanchez-Diaz; Masato Kanemaki; Frederick van Deursen; Ricky D Edmondson; Karim Labib
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2006-03-12       Impact factor: 28.824

4.  MEC1-dependent phosphorylation of Rad9p in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  A Emili
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  RAD9, RAD17, and RAD24 are required for S phase regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  A G Paulovich; R U Margulies; B M Garvik; L H Hartwell
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Eukaryotic DNA damage checkpoint activation in response to double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Karen Finn; Noel Francis Lowndes; Muriel Grenon
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 9.261

7.  Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint.

Authors:  J A Tercero; J F Diffley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-08-02       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Regulation of DNA-replication origins during cell-cycle progression.

Authors:  K Shirahige; Y Hori; K Shiraishi; M Yamashita; K Takahashi; C Obuse; T Tsurimoto; H Yoshikawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-10-08       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) produces heat-labile DNA damage but no detectable in vivo DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Cecilia Lundin; Matthew North; Klaus Erixon; Kevin Walters; Dag Jenssen; Alastair S H Goldman; Thomas Helleday
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-07-11       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Cohesin relocation from sites of chromosomal loading to places of convergent transcription.

Authors:  Armelle Lengronne; Yuki Katou; Saori Mori; Shihori Yokobayashi; Gavin P Kelly; Takehiko Itoh; Yoshinori Watanabe; Katsuhiko Shirahige; Frank Uhlmann
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-06-30       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  Right time, right place-DNA damage and DNA replication checkpoints collectively safeguard S phase.

Authors:  Lorenzo Galanti; Boris Pfander
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Tolerance of DNA Replication Stress Is Promoted by Fumarate Through Modulation of Histone Demethylation and Enhancement of Replicative Intermediate Processing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Faeze Saatchi; Ann L Kirchmaier
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  DNA damage kinase signaling: checkpoint and repair at 30 years.

Authors:  Michael Charles Lanz; Diego Dibitetto; Marcus Bustamante Smolka
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 4.  The more the merrier: how homo-oligomerization alters the interactome and function of ribonucleotide reductase.

Authors:  Marcus J C Long; Alexandra Van Hall-Beauvais; Yimon Aye
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 8.822

5.  A mechanism for Rad53 to couple leading- and lagging-strand DNA synthesis under replication stress in budding yeast.

Authors:  Albert Serra-Cardona; Chuanhe Yu; Xinmin Zhang; Xu Hua; Yuan Yao; Jiaqi Zhou; Haiyun Gan; Zhiguo Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Walking a tightrope: The complex balancing act of R-loops in genome stability.

Authors:  Joshua R Brickner; Jada L Garzon; Karlene A Cimprich
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 19.328

7.  Regulation of the abundance of Y-family polymerases in the cell cycle of budding yeast in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  Aleksandra Sobolewska; Agnieszka Halas; Michal Plachta; Justyna McIntyre; Ewa Sledziewska-Gojska
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 3.886

Review 8.  Homologous Recombination: To Fork and Beyond.

Authors:  Félix Prado
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 9.  The Replication Stress Response on a Narrow Path Between Genomic Instability and Inflammation.

Authors:  Hervé Técher; Philippe Pasero
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-06-25

10.  Topoisomerase 1 prevents replication stress at R-loop-enriched transcription termination sites.

Authors:  Alexy Promonet; Ismaël Padioleau; Yaqun Liu; Lionel Sanz; Anna Biernacka; Anne-Lyne Schmitz; Magdalena Skrzypczak; Amélie Sarrazin; Clément Mettling; Maga Rowicka; Krzysztof Ginalski; Frédéric Chedin; Chun-Long Chen; Yea-Lih Lin; Philippe Pasero
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.