Literature DB >> 19482564

The checkpoint response to replication stress.

Dana Branzei1, Marco Foiani.   

Abstract

Genome instability is a hallmark of cancer cells, and defective DNA replication, repair and recombination have been linked to its etiology. Increasing evidence suggests that proteins influencing S-phase processes such as replication fork movement and stability, repair events and replication completion, have significant roles in maintaining genome stability. DNA damage and replication stress activate a signal transduction cascade, often referred to as the checkpoint response. A central goal of the replication checkpoint is to maintain the integrity of the replication forks while facilitating replication completion and DNA repair and coordinating these events with cell cycle transitions. Progression through the cell cycle in spite of defective or incomplete DNA synthesis or unrepaired DNA lesions may result in broken chromosomes, genome aberrations, and an accumulation of mutations. In this review we discuss the multiple roles of the replication checkpoint during replication and in response to replication stress, as well as the enzymatic activities that cooperate with the checkpoint pathway to promote fork resumption and repair of DNA lesions thereby contributing to genome integrity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19482564     DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.04.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  137 in total

1.  The contribution of the S-phase checkpoint genes MEC1 and SGS1 to genome stability maintenance in Candida albicans.

Authors:  Melanie Legrand; Christine L Chan; Peter A Jauert; David T Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Fungal Genet Biol       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 3.495

2.  Keeping it together in times of stress: checkpoint function at stalled replication forks.

Authors:  Theresa J Berens; David P Toczyski
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  Brc1-dependent recovery from replication stress.

Authors:  Kirstin L Bass; Johanne M Murray; Matthew J O'Connell
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 5.285

4.  RMI1 promotes DNA replication fork progression and recovery from replication fork stress.

Authors:  Jay Yang; Lara O'Donnell; Daniel Durocher; Grant W Brown
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  DNA damage detected with gammaH2AX in endometrioid adenocarcinoma cell lines.

Authors:  Maki Ikeda; Akira Kurose; Eriko Takatori; Toru Sugiyama; Frank Traganos; Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz; Takashi Sawai
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.650

6.  Analysis of replication profiles reveals key role of RFC-Ctf18 in yeast replication stress response.

Authors:  Laure Crabbé; Aubin Thomas; Véronique Pantesco; John De Vos; Philippe Pasero; Armelle Lengronne
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2010-10-24       Impact factor: 15.369

7.  Cdc45 protein-single-stranded DNA interaction is important for stalling the helicase during replication stress.

Authors:  Irina Bruck; Daniel L Kaplan
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 8.  Structure and function of Pif1 helicase.

Authors:  Alicia K Byrd; Kevin D Raney
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 5.407

Review 9.  Chromatin and the genome integrity network.

Authors:  Manolis Papamichos-Chronakis; Craig L Peterson
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 53.242

10.  Depletion of deoxyribonucleotide pools is an endogenous source of DNA damage in cells undergoing oncogene-induced senescence.

Authors:  Sudha Mannava; Kalyana C Moparthy; Linda J Wheeler; Venkatesh Natarajan; Shoshanna N Zucker; Emily E Fink; Michael Im; Sheryl Flanagan; William C Burhans; Nathalie C Zeitouni; Donna S Shewach; Christopher K Mathews; Mikhail A Nikiforov
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 4.307

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.