| Literature DB >> 30275350 |
Inés Urquiaga1, Danitza Troncoso2, Maria José Mackenna3, Catalina Urzúa4, Druso Pérez5, Sara Dicenta6, Paula María de la Cerda7, Ludwig Amigo8, Juan Carlos Carreño9, Guadalupe Echeverría10, Attilio Rigotti11,12.
Abstract
Wine grape pomace flour (WGPF) is a fruit byproduct that is high in fiber and antioxidants. We tested whether WGPF consumption could affect blood biochemical parameters, including oxidative stress biomarkers. In a three-month intervention study, 27 male volunteers, each with some components of metabolic syndrome, consumed a beef burger supplemented with 7% WGPF containing 3.5% of fiber and 1.2 mg gallic equivalents (GE)/g of polyphenols (WGPF-burger), daily, during the first month. The volunteers consumed no burgers in the second month, and one control-burger daily in the third month. At baseline and after these periods, we evaluated the metabolic syndrome components, plasma antioxidant status (i.e., 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical scavenging capacity (DPPH), vitamin E, vitamin C), and oxidative damage markers (i.e., advanced oxidation protein products (AOPPs), oxidized low-density lipoproteins (oxLDLs), malondialdehyde (MDA)). The WGPF-burger intake significantly reduced glycemia and homeostatic model assessment-based measurement of insulin resistance. Vitamin C increased and decreased during the consumption of the WGPF-burger and control-burger, respectively. The WGPF-burger intake significantly decreased AOPP and oxLDL levels. Vitamin E and MDA levels showed no significant changes. In conclusion, the consumption of beef burgers prepared with WGPF improved fasting glucose and insulin resistance, plasma antioxidant levels, and oxidative damage markers. Therefore, this functional ingredient has potential as a dietary supplement to manage chronic disease risk in humans.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidant; dietary intervention; fiber; oxidative damage; wine grape pomace
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30275350 PMCID: PMC6213438 DOI: 10.3390/nu10101388
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Composition of burgers.
| WGPF-Burger (100 g) | Control-Burger (100 g) | |
|---|---|---|
|
| 168 | 168 |
|
| 13.3 ± 0.16 | 16.0 ± 0.24 |
|
| 10.9 ± 0.02 | 11.6 ± 0.06 |
|
| 5.7 ± 0.04 | 5.9 ± 0.07 |
|
| 0.0 | 0.0 |
|
| 5.0 ± 0.04 | 5.3 ± 0.05 |
|
| 0.2 ± 0.05 | 0.2 ± 0.05 |
|
| 81 ± 4 | 81 ± 4 |
|
| 4.1 ± 0.67 | 0.0 |
|
| 0.1 | 0.0 |
|
| 3.5 ± 0.67 | 0.0 |
|
| 1.21 ± 0.02 | 0.396 ± 0.019 |
|
| 17.2 ± 1.29 | 1.82 ± 0.23 |
Data were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). GE: gallic equivalent; ORAC: oxygen radical absorbance capacity; TE: Trolox® equivalent; WGPF: wine grape pomace flour. * Nitrogen-free extract minus dietary fiber.
Baseline anthropometric, clinical, and biochemical characteristics of volunteers (n = 27).
| Parameter | Mean ± SD |
|---|---|
| Age (years) | 43.6 ± 11.2 |
|
| |
| Weight (kg) | 87.1 ± 13.5 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 29.5 ± 3.7 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 101.0 ± 9.6 |
|
| |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 122.1 ± 15.1 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 80.2 ± 10.6 |
|
| |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 89.3 ± 7.0 |
| Insulin (mg/dL) | 14.2 ± 6.8 |
|
| |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 189.8 ± 30.5 |
| LDL cholesterol (mg/dL) | 109.7 ± 31.1 |
| HDL cholesterol (mg/dL) | 47.3 ± 14.7 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 163.3 ± 133.9 |
HDL: high-density lipoprotein; LDL: low-density lipoprotein.
Figure 1Effects of the consumption of burgers on (A) glycemia and (B) HOMA (homeostatic model assessment) throughout the study. Volunteers consumed one WGPF-burger daily between weeks 0 and 4 (intervention period), followed by a washout period (weeks 4 to 8), and then consumed one control-burger daily between weeks 8 and 12 (control period). Bars represent the mean value for each time. Lines represent the 95% confidence interval. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of four repeated measures with the repeated contrast method was used to evaluate changes between the 4-week intervention periods over time.
Figure 2Effect of the consumption of burgers on plasma vitamin C throughout the study. Volunteers consumed one WGPF-burger daily between weeks 0 and 4 (intervention period), followed by a washout period (weeks 4 to 8), and then consumed one control-burger daily between weeks 8 and 12 (control period). Bars represent the mean value for each time; lines represent the 95% confidence interval. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of four repeated measures with the repeated contrast method was used to evaluate changes between the 4-week intervention periods over time.
Figure 3Effect of the consumption of burgers on (A) uric acid and (B) antioxidant capacity in plasma throughout the study. Volunteers consumed one WGPF-burger daily between weeks 0 and 4 (intervention period), followed by a washout period (weeks 4 to 8), and then consumed one control-burger daily between weeks 8 and 12 (control period). Bars represent the mean value for each time; lines represent the 95% confidence interval. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of four repeated measures with the repeated contrast method was used to evaluate changes between the 4-week intervention periods over time. DPPH: 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl; TE: Trolox® equivalent.
Figure 4Protein oxidative damage measured as plasma advanced oxidation protein product (AOPP) concentrations of volunteers during the study. Volunteers consumed one WGPF-burger daily between weeks 0 and 4 (intervention period), followed by a washout period (weeks 4 to 8), and then consumed one control-burger daily between weeks 8 and 12 (control period). Bars represent the mean value for each time; lines represent the 95% confidence interval. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the four repeated measures with the repeated contrast method was used to evaluate changes between the 4-week intervention periods over time.
Figure 5Oxidative damage to LDL, measured as plasma oxLDL concentrations of volunteers during the study. Volunteers consumed one WGPF-burger daily between weeks 0 and 4 (intervention period), followed by a washout period (weeks 4 to 8), and then consumed one control-burger daily between weeks 8 and 12 (control period). Bars represent the mean value for each time; lines represent the 95% confidence interval. The Friedman test was used to evaluate changes between the 4-week intervention periods over time. LDL: low-density lipoprotein; oxLDL: oxidized low-density lipoprotein.