Anton Kuzyk1,2, Ralf Jungmann3,4, Guillermo P Acuna5, Na Liu1,6. 1. Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, Heisenbergstrasse 3, D-70569 Stuttgart, Germany. 2. Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, P.O. Box 12200, FI-00076 Aalto, Finland. 3. Department of Physics and Center for Nanoscience, Ludwig Maximilian University, 80539 Munich, Germany. 4. Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 82152 Martinsried near Munich, Germany. 5. Institute for Physical & Theoretical Chemistry, and Braunschweig Integrated Centre of Systems Biology (BRICS), and Laboratory for Emerging Nanometrology (LENA), Braunschweig University of Technology, Rebenring 56, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany. 6. Kirchhoff Institute for Physics, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 227, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Abstract
The specificity and simplicity of the Watson-Crick base pair interactions make DNA one of the most versatile construction materials for creating nanoscale structures and devices. Among several DNA-based approaches, the DNA origami technique excels in programmable self-assembly of complex, arbitrary shaped structures with dimensions of hundreds of nanometers. Importantly, DNA origami can be used as templates for assembly of functional nanoscale components into three-dimensional structures with high precision and controlled stoichiometry. This is often beyond the reach of other nanofabrication techniques. In this Perspective, we highlight the capability of the DNA origami technique for realization of novel nanophotonic systems. First, we introduce the basic principles of designing and fabrication of DNA origami structures. Subsequently, we review recent advances of the DNA origami applications in nanoplasmonics, single-molecule and super-resolution fluorescent imaging, as well as hybrid photonic systems. We conclude by outlining the future prospects of the DNA origami technique for advanced nanophotonic systems with tailored functionalities.
The specificity and simplicity of the Watson-Crick base pair interactions make DNA one of the most versatile construction materials for creating nanoscale structures and devices. Among several DNA-based approaches, the DNA origami technique excels in programmable self-assembly of complex, arbitrary shaped structures with dimensions of hundreds of nanometers. Importantly, DNA origami can be used as templates for assembly of functional nanoscale components into three-dimensional structures with high precision and controlled stoichiometry. This is often beyond the reach of other nanofabrication techniques. In this Perspective, we highlight the capability of the DNA origami technique for realization of novel nanophotonic systems. First, we introduce the basic principles of designing and fabrication of DNA origami structures. Subsequently, we review recent advances of the DNA origami applications in nanoplasmonics, single-molecule and super-resolution fluorescent imaging, as well as hybrid photonic systems. We conclude by outlining the future prospects of the DNA origami technique for advanced nanophotonic systems with tailored functionalities.
Precise arrangement
of individual
photonic building blocks in space, including metal nanoparticles (NPs),
quantum dots (QDs), nanodiamonds, fluorophores, etc., is crucial for
creation of advanced nanophotonic systems with tailored optical properties
and novel functionalities. Despite the remarkable advances in nanophotonics
enabled by top-down fabrication techniques, critical limitations remain.
For instance, realization of three-dimensional complex nanostructures,
especially with structural reconfiguration as well as organization
of nanoscale components of different species in close proximity, is
still challenging.Molecular self-assembly offers an alternative
to circumvent these
limitations.[1,2] In particular, the DNA origami
technique[3−7] identifies a unique route for the realization of nanophotonic structures
with hierarchical complexities. DNA origami can be created in almost
any arbitrary shapes. Such origami structures can then serve as templates
for assembly of a variety of functional components[8] with nanoscale precision.Figure illustrates
the workflow of the DNA origami fabrication. Long single-stranded
DNA (ssDNA) with known sequence (called “scaffold” and
derived from the single-stranded genome of the M13 bacteriophage)
is mixed with a set of short synthetic ssDNA (called “staples”
and usually purchased from oligonucleotide synthesis vendors) (Figure a). Each “staple”
strand possesses a unique sequence and binds the scaffold at specific
positions. This makes DNA origami fully addressable. The staple strands
fold the scaffold strand into a predesigned two- or three-dimensional
shape (Figure b).
ssDNA extensions (called capture strands) or chemical modifications,
e.g., biotin and amino groups on origami, can serve as binding sites
for the precise arrangement of nanoscale components including proteins,[9−14] metal NPs,[15−21] QDs,[22−24] and nanodiamonds,[25,26] which are
functionalized with complementary binding modifications (Figure b). Fluorophores
are often directly incorporated into the DNA “staple”
strands for arrangement on DNA origami structures.[27−32]
Figure 1
Principle
of the DNA origami folding, design, and assembly. (a)
DNA origami consists of long single-strand DNA (“scaffold”)
and several hundreds of short ssDNA strands (“staples”).
(b) Upon thermal annealing, the “staples” fold the “scaffold”
strands into two- or three-dimensional structures with predesigned
shapes. DNA origami structures can be modified with ssDNA extensions
that serve as binding sites for further assembly of different nanoscale
components, including fluorophores, quantum dots, nanodiamonds, metal
nanoparticles, proteins, etc., into almost arbitrary geometries with
nanometer precision. (c) DNA origami structures are usually designed
with caDNAno software. (d) Sequences of the “staple”
strands required for the assembly are generated. (e) “Staple”
strands are usually purchased in multiwall plates from commercial
vendors specializing in automated DNA synthesis. Single-stranded phage
DNA is typically used as scaffold for DNA origami structures. The
scaffold strands can be produced by M13 phage amplification or purchased
from several suppliers. Scaffold is mixed with “staple”
strands (with a large excess), and the origami structures are assembled
through thermal annealing. The structures are usually purified before
being used as templates for further assembly. (f) Atomic force microscopy
(AFM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) are often used to
characterize two- and three-dimensional origami structures.
Principle
of the DNA origami folding, design, and assembly. (a)
DNA origami consists of long single-strand DNA (“scaffold”)
and several hundreds of short ssDNA strands (“staples”).
(b) Upon thermal annealing, the “staples” fold the “scaffold”
strands into two- or three-dimensional structures with predesigned
shapes. DNA origami structures can be modified with ssDNA extensions
that serve as binding sites for further assembly of different nanoscale
components, including fluorophores, quantum dots, nanodiamonds, metal
nanoparticles, proteins, etc., into almost arbitrary geometries with
nanometer precision. (c) DNA origami structures are usually designed
with caDNAno software. (d) Sequences of the “staple”
strands required for the assembly are generated. (e) “Staple”
strands are usually purchased in multiwall plates from commercial
vendors specializing in automated DNA synthesis. Single-stranded phage
DNA is typically used as scaffold for DNA origami structures. The
scaffold strands can be produced by M13 phage amplification or purchased
from several suppliers. Scaffold is mixed with “staple”
strands (with a large excess), and the origami structures are assembled
through thermal annealing. The structures are usually purified before
being used as templates for further assembly. (f) Atomic force microscopy
(AFM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) are often used to
characterize two- and three-dimensional origami structures.Generally, the workflow of a DNA
origami-templated nanophotonic
system starts with identification of individual components of interest
and their desired relative spatial arrangement. Subsequently, a DNA
origami structure with certain geometry is conceived to template such
an arrangement. The DNA origami structure is designed using computer-aided
design (CAD) open source software, e.g., caDNAno[33] (Figure c). As output, a set of DNA sequences for the staple strands (Figure d) is generated and
sent to commercial vendors specializing in automated DNA synthesis
(Figure e). The obtained
staple strands are mixed with the scaffold strand of choice (produced
by M13 phage amplification[34,35] or purchased) followed
by thermal annealing. The origami structures are then purified[36−40] for structural characterizations (Figure f). Functionalization of individual components
that can bind to the origami often utilizes conjugation with ssDNA
strands,[41−44] complementary to the capture strands. Another frequently used method
relies on incorporation of biotin/streptavidin modifications for
binding to the origami through streptavidin−biotin interactions.[19,22,25,45] Less often used are alkyne, amino, and azido functional groups.[46,47]There are excellent reviews and perspectives that elucidate
the
technical aspects of the DNA origami technique, including designing,
assembly, and characterization of DNA origami structures.[36,39,48] Since its birth, the DNA origami
technique has been widely used in a wealth of research fields,[6,8,49−51] for instance,
drug delivery,[52] artificial nanopores,[53−55] single molecule studies,[56−58] nanometrology and macroscopy
standards,[29,59−62] etc. In this perspective, we
will focus on the applications of DNA origami in nanophotonics. Particularly,
we highlight several promising directions, along which the DNA origami
technique may help to solve the present technological challenges and
open new pathways to realizing nanophotonic systems with novel functionalities.
DNA
Origami for Nanoplasmonics
Localized surface plasmon resonances
result from collective oscillations
of the conduction electrons in metal NPs, when they interact with
light. The plasmon resonances can be tuned by the compositions, shapes,
and local surroundings of the metal NPs. Plasmons of metal NPs placed
in close proximity can be coupled, mixed, and hybridized.[63] Such coupling is very sensitive to the relative
arrangement of the individual NPs in space. On one hand, this provides
a unique opportunity to engineer near- and far-field optical properties
of the constructed nanostructures.[64−66] On the other hand, it
poses many technical challenges to assemble metal NPs into well-defined
configurations, especially in three dimensions.[67]At the end of the 20th century, DNA emerged as one
of the most
versatile construction materials at the nanoscale.[68] Utilization of DNA for assembly of metal NPs into larger
structures was first demonstrated by Alivisatos and Mirkin in 1996.[69,70] Since then, DNA has been widely used for direct assembly of NPs
into a variety of structures with increasing complexities.[17,71−74] Impressive progress has been witnessed in DNA-based assembly of
two- and three-dimensional periodic lattices.[75−81] However, fabrication of well-defined plasmonic clusters composed
of discrete numbers of interacting metal NPs remained challenging
until the introduction of the DNA origami technique in 2006 by Rothemund.[3] Inherent addressability of the DNA origami made
it ideally suitable for templated assembly of plasmonic nanostructures.
Nevertheless, several technical challenges had to be overcome in order
to achieve plasmonic systems with distinct optical properties. The
first advancement was the realization of high-yield assembly of NPs
on DNA origami templates[15,82−84] (Figure a–d).
Initially, single-layer DNA origami and spherical gold nanoparticles
(AuNPs) were widely used due to the ease of design and fabrication.
DNA conjugation with AuNPs was done through a gold–thiol bond.[16,82,85] Soon after this, methods for
assembly of silver spherical NPs[84] (Figure d) and anisotropic
gold nanorods (NRs) were developed.[86] In
addition, further advancement of the origami technique, for instance,
extension into three dimensions[4] and introduction
of twisted and curved structures,[87] enabled
fabrication of DNA origami-templated assemblies of metal NPs[19,88−90] with unprecedented complexities (Figures e–h).
Figure 2
DNA origami for nanoplasmonics.
(a–d) Examples of metal
NP assemblies templated by DNA origami with high yield and accuracy.[82−85] (e–h) Sophisticated metal NP assemblies on three-dimensional
complex origami templates.[19,88−90] (i) Metallization of DNA origami ring structures.[92] (j) Metal NPs fused together on DNA origami through electroless
metal deposition.[95] (k,l) DNA origami structures
as molds for growth of metal colloids with defined morphologies.[96] (m) DNA origami-templated assembly of helical
NP assemblies with strong plasmonic circular dichroism in the visible
spectral range.[94] (n) Chiral plasmonic
assemblies with gold NRs.[107] (o) Plasmonic
nanostructures with dynamically controlled optical responses enabled
by stimulus-driven DNA origami templates.[120,121,125] (p) Plasmonic walker on DNA
origami.[133] Scale bars: (a–c) 100
nm, (d) 20 nm, (e) 100 nm, (f) 50 nm, (g) 30 nm, (h) 50 nm, (i,j)
100 nm, (m) 20 nm, (n,o) 50 nm.
DNA origami for nanoplasmonics.
(a–d) Examples of metal
NP assemblies templated by DNA origami with high yield and accuracy.[82−85] (e–h) Sophisticated metal NP assemblies on three-dimensional
complex origami templates.[19,88−90] (i) Metallization of DNA origami ring structures.[92] (j) Metal NPs fused together on DNA origami through electroless
metal deposition.[95] (k,l) DNA origami structures
as molds for growth of metal colloids with defined morphologies.[96] (m) DNA origami-templated assembly of helical
NP assemblies with strong plasmonic circular dichroism in the visible
spectral range.[94] (n) Chiral plasmonic
assemblies with gold NRs.[107] (o) Plasmonic
nanostructures with dynamically controlled optical responses enabled
by stimulus-driven DNA origami templates.[120,121,125] (p) Plasmonic walker on DNA
origami.[133] Scale bars: (a–c) 100
nm, (d) 20 nm, (e) 100 nm, (f) 50 nm, (g) 30 nm, (h) 50 nm, (i,j)
100 nm, (m) 20 nm, (n,o) 50 nm.Apart from the well-established approach to assemble metal
NPs
on DNA origami with ssDNA capture strands,[91] there are also several other solutions. Attempts were made to metalize
the entire origami structures[92,93] (Figure i). For metallization, DNA templates were
first seeded with small gold or silver clusters followed by electroless
deposition of gold for further metal growth. Electroless metal deposition
not only enlarged the size of the NPs[94] but also could fuse the particles together[95] (Figure j). DNA
origami structures were also used as molds for growth of metal colloids
with complex shapes.[96,97] A small particle served as seed
(Figure k), and the
origami structure restricted the growth of the metal into a specific
and predefined shape (Figure l). In addition, standard silicon etching and metal deposition
techniques were used to transfer the shape of two-dimensional DNA
origami objects into metal nanostructures.[98,99]The ability to arrange metal NPs on DNA origami templates
with
high yield and accuracy opened the pathway to construct plasmonic
structures with novel optical properties. In 2012, Liedl and Ding
used DNA origami to arrange metal NPs into helical assemblies,[94,100] respectively (see Figure m), which exhibited strong plasmonic circular dichroism in
the visible spectral range, originated from collective interactions
of the metal NPs in the helical geometry.[101] Since then, DNA origami has been widely used as templates for assembly
of spherical NPs[89,90,102,103] and NRs[104−108] (Figure n–p)
into chiral plasmonic structures.[109−111] Utilization of NRs
provides an additional benefit for generating a stronger optical response
compared to spherical NPs.[112] However,
assembly of NRs on DNA origami is technically more challenging. Another
example of origami-based plasmonic nanostructures with novel optical
responses is a ring of NPs, which exhibited both electric and magnetic
resonances at visible frequencies[88] (Figure f). Other progresses
have also been achieved in fabrication of NP-based waveguides for
energy transfer.[113−115]Importantly, DNA origami-templated
plasmonic nanostructures are
not limited to static systems.[116] The solution-based
nature of DNA structures and dynamic DNA nanotechnology[117,118] provides a unique way to actively manipulate both spatial and temporal
arrangements of metal NPs, enabling reconfigurable plasmonic systems
with dynamically controlled optical responses. The Liedl group demonstrated
reversible plasmonic circular dichroism responses by orientation switching
of the origami-templated chiral plasmonic assemblies on the surface.[119] Reconfigurable plasmonic structures were also
realized by assembly of metal NPs on dynamic DNA origami templates,
which were switched among several configurations by external stimuli
(Figure o). The spatial
reconfiguration of the DNA origami templates resulted in rearrangement
of the plasmonic NPs and therefore altered optical responses.[120−123] There are various ways to control the configurations of the DNA
origami templates.[116] Probably the most
versatile and thus widespread approach is based on the so-called “toehold-mediated
strand displacement reaction”,[117] which utilizes DNA strands as fuel to regulate spatial configurations.[120] Also, photoresponsive molecules such as azobenzene
can be employed through incorporation with DNA to activate responses
upon light stimuli.[121,124] Recently, selective manipulation
of DNA origami-based plasmonic structures has been demonstrated, taking
the advantage of the pH sensitivity of the DNA triplexes.[125,126] More intriguing approaches could include reversible reconfiguration
based on shape-complementarity[127,128] or structural adaptions
of aptamers to the presence of target molecules.[129−131] In addition to using reconfigurable DNA origami templates, it is
also possible to rearrange metal NPs on static DNA origami templates
(see Figure p). In
this approach, NPs are either guided by the so-called molecular walkers[132] or act as walkers themselves.[133,134]
DNA Origami for Fluorescence Imaging
Since its invention,
DNA origami has found numerous applications
in the field of fluorescence imaging,[135] owing to its bottom-up self-assembly properties and the availability
of dye-modified oligonucleotides. Especially, the combination of DNA
origami nanostructures with single-molecule fluorescence techniques
is attractive due to origami’s unique spatial addressability
on length scales ranging from a few to hundreds of nanometers combined
with exquisite positioning accuracy. One of the first applications
of DNA origami in single-molecule fluorescence was its combination
with emerging super-resolution techniques[136−138] to create nanoscopic rulers for resolution calibration.[139] Stochastic super-resolution techniques circumvent
the classical diffraction limit of light by “switching”
fluorophores from the so-called dark- to bright-states and back, thus
only activating and localizing the emission of a single dye molecule
in a diffraction-limited area at every given point in time. Time-lapsed
acquisition and repeated switching then eventually allow for complete
reconstruction of all molecule positions, yielding a super-resolution
image. While super-resolution techniques readily achieve spatial resolutions
down to a few tens of nanometers, it is hard to precisely quantify
their achievable spatial resolution due to the lack of versatile nanoscale
rulers. However, DNA origami nanostructures are ideal calibration
standards[59,139] due to their high folding yield
and subnanometer positioning accuracy.DNA origami nanostructures
are also ideally suited as test structures
for the development of new imaging approaches. While stochastic super-resolution
techniques such as stochastic reconstruction microscopy (STORM)[138] or photoactivated localization microscopy (PALM)[137] are already starting to transform the way we
look at biology today, their experimental implementation—especially
with regard to multiplexed detection, i.e. the imaging of multiple
targets—is still challenging due to the necessity to carefully
adjust buffer conditions for each fluorophore species. DNA Points
Accumulation In Nanoscale Topography (DNA-PAINT)[140−150] was developed to overcome some of the difficulties of incumbent
super-resolution approaches. In DNA-PAINT, stochastic “blinking”
of targets is achieved by the transient hybridization of short, dye-labeled
oligonucleotides (called “imager” strands) to their
complementary strands (“docking” strands) on a target
of interest (Figure a). Unbound imager strands freely diffuse in solution, adding only
minimal background when image acquisition is performed in total internal
reflection or oblique illumination.[151] As
DNA-PAINT uses transient hybridization of short oligonucleotides to
create the necessary blinking in stochastic reconstruction microscopy,
it is ideally suited to visualize DNA nanostructures. With obtainable
spatial resolution on the nanometer scale, features such as the two
faces of the DNA origami structure—spaced only 16 nm apart—are
clearly resolvable (Figure b).
Figure 3
DNA origami for fluorescence applications. (a) Super-resolution
imaging by DNA-PAINT. Short dye-labeled oligonucleotides bind transiently
to their complementary target on a DNA origami structure. The transient
binding creates an apparent “blinking” used for stochastic
super-resolution microscopy.[140] (b) Tunnel-like
DNA origami with DNA-PAINT docking strands at red-colored faces imaged
using transmission electron microscopy, diffraction-limited microscopy,
and DNA-PAINT super-resolution microscopy.[147] (c) Exchange-PAINT enables spectrally unlimited super-resolution
multiplexing. Distinct molecular targets are labeled with orthogonal
docking strands. Subsequent imaging is performed sequentially with
alternating washing and imaging rounds using the same color fluorophore
for all rounds.[147] (d) DNA-PAINT’s
resistance to photobleaching in combination with intricate drift correction
enables ultraresolution imaging, resolving docking strands spaced
5 nm apart on DNA origami structures.[153] (e) 3D-DNA-PAINT image of a DNA tetrahedron.[146] (f) Origami’s precise control over spatial positioning
and stoichiometry enables the construction of 124 “metafluorophores”
for diffraction-limited barcoding applications using only three spectral
colors and five prescribed intensity levels.[154]
DNA origami for fluorescence applications. (a) Super-resolution
imaging by DNA-PAINT. Short dye-labeled oligonucleotides bind transiently
to their complementary target on a DNA origami structure. The transient
binding creates an apparent “blinking” used for stochastic
super-resolution microscopy.[140] (b) Tunnel-like
DNA origami with DNA-PAINT docking strands at red-colored faces imaged
using transmission electron microscopy, diffraction-limited microscopy,
and DNA-PAINT super-resolution microscopy.[147] (c) Exchange-PAINT enables spectrally unlimited super-resolution
multiplexing. Distinct molecular targets are labeled with orthogonal
docking strands. Subsequent imaging is performed sequentially with
alternating washing and imaging rounds using the same color fluorophore
for all rounds.[147] (d) DNA-PAINT’s
resistance to photobleaching in combination with intricate drift correction
enables ultraresolution imaging, resolving docking strands spaced
5 nm apart on DNA origami structures.[153] (e) 3D-DNA-PAINT image of a DNA tetrahedron.[146] (f) Origami’s precise control over spatial positioning
and stoichiometry enables the construction of 124 “metafluorophores”
for diffraction-limited barcoding applications using only three spectral
colors and five prescribed intensity levels.[154]In DNA-PAINT, imaging and labeling
probes can actually be seen
as DNA barcodes owing to their unique sequences of the DNA bases.
Thus, multiplexing can be easily achieved by sequential imaging of
different target molecules labeled with orthogonal docking strands
(Figure c). In this
approach, called Exchange-PAINT,[147] the
first target (e.g., P1) is imaged by the complementary strand (e.g.,
P1*, Figure c). Then
a washing buffer is introduced to remove P1* from the sample, followed
by the introduction of P2* imager strands to visualize the second
target. This imaging and washing procedure is repeated until images
for all targets are successfully acquired and pseudocolors were assigned.
Exchange-PAINT now enables spectrally unlimited multiplexing, only
restricted by the amount of orthogonal DNA sequences, which could
easily reach hundreds under appropriate experimental conditions. Similar
exchange strategies can be applied for other super-resolution approaches
as well, using slightly more stable hybridization probes in combination
with mild denaturation during washing rounds.[152]Due to DNA-PAINT’s resistance to photobleaching
(imager
strands are constantly replenished from solution), very high spatial
resolutions are achievable by extracting the maximum number of photons
from a dye-labeled strand before unbinding from its target. In combination
with intricate drift correction,[149] DNA-PAINT
achieves molecular-scale spatial resolutions of better than 5 nm,
as demonstrated by imaging the MPI and LMU logo on DNA nanostructures
shown in Figure d
with single binding sites spaced 5 nm apart.[153] 3D super-resolution imaging of complex 3D DNA origami nanostructures
is also straightforward to implement by using a cylindrical lens in
the microscope imaging path to encode the 3D location in an elliptical
point spread function[146] (Figure e).Further applications
of DNA-based super-resolution imaging have
demonstrated quantitative target detection in vitro and in situ in single cells, allowing researchers
to count integer numbers of biomolecules based on their kinetic signature
without spatially resolving them,[150] even
allowing single nucleotide mismatch discrimination of RNA targets.[148] Also, DNA origami is ideally suited for applications
that do not require super-resolution. In a recent study, DNA origami
structures have been used to enable the construction of novel fluorescent
probes, termed “metafluorophores”, that enable diffraction-limited
imaging with up to 124 distinct colors.[154] This was achieved by using the exquisite spatial arrangement accuracy
of origami to prepare objects with a defined number of dyes, thus
allowing for the construction of intensity barcodes (Figure f).
DNA Origami for Hybrid
Photonic Structures
One of the main advantages of the DNA
origami technique lies in
its capacity to self-assemble different species with precise stoichiometry
control and nanometer precision. Perhaps one of the simplest examples
of a hybrid photonic structure consists of a pair of fluorophores
placed in close proximity. For distances typically below 10 nm, fluorescence
resonance energy transfer (FRET) can occur between the fluorophores.
The incorporation of fluorophores to DNA origami structures is straightforward.
Staple strands labeled at a desired position with a palette of fluorophores
across the visible range are commercially available. Most fluorophores
are incorporated to the DNA sequences forming the staple strands through
one linker. Although this approach guarantees a nanometer positioning
of the fluorophore within the DNA origami structure, its orientation
cannot be determined and will depend among other factors on the resulting
fluorophore’s charge.Figure a depicts
a fluorophore system self-assembled onto rectangular DNA origami.
The precise arrangement of the fluorophores enables light guiding
via FRET[155] with an energy path that can
be controlled by the presence of a fluorophore acting as a “jumper”.
Furthermore, the DNA origami technique has also been exploited to
self-assemble fluorophore systems for fabrication of artificial light
harvesting antennas.[28,30,31]
Figure 4
DNA
origami for hybrid nanophotonic systems. (a) Directing light
through FRET along fluorophores. A single fluorophore (depicted in
green) is employed as “jumper”.[155] (b) Sketch of a rectangular DNA origami structure with
a single AuNP and fluorophore employed to study the distance dependence
energy transfer.[161] (c) Optical antenna
dimer for fluorescence enhancement. (d) The incident light polarization
is rotated to match the dimer orientation.[168] (e) Optical antennas dimer for SERS applications.[172] (f) Single molecule SERS signal obtained with gold dimer
antenna covered with silver to further reduce the gap distance[173] (g). (h) Sketch of a DNA origami structure
with a single AuNP and a fluorophore pair for plasmonic enhanced FRET
studies.[176] (i) Plasmonic NPs-based optical
waveguide for energy transfer over 50 nm.[114] (j) Study of the emission coupling between single molecules and
NPs using super resolution techniques.[177] (k) Combination of DNA origami structures and lithographic plasmonic
structures such as zero mode waveguides[178] and (l) photonic crystal cavities.[180] Scale bars: (j) 200 nm, (l) 250 nm (top), and 500 nm (bottom).
DNA
origami for hybrid nanophotonic systems. (a) Directing light
through FRET along fluorophores. A single fluorophore (depicted in
green) is employed as “jumper”.[155] (b) Sketch of a rectangular DNA origami structure with
a single AuNP and fluorophore employed to study the distance dependence
energy transfer.[161] (c) Optical antenna
dimer for fluorescence enhancement. (d) The incident light polarization
is rotated to match the dimer orientation.[168] (e) Optical antennas dimer for SERS applications.[172] (f) Single molecule SERS signal obtained with gold dimer
antenna covered with silver to further reduce the gap distance[173] (g). (h) Sketch of a DNA origami structure
with a single AuNP and a fluorophore pair for plasmonic enhanced FRET
studies.[176] (i) Plasmonic NPs-based optical
waveguide for energy transfer over 50 nm.[114] (j) Study of the emission coupling between single molecules and
NPs using super resolution techniques.[177] (k) Combination of DNA origami structures and lithographic plasmonic
structures such as zero mode waveguides[178] and (l) photonic crystal cavities.[180] Scale bars: (j) 200 nm, (l) 250 nm (top), and 500 nm (bottom).In addition to a combination of
fluorophores,[32] another type of widespread
hybrid photonic structures comprises
optical light sources coupled to optical antennas.[156] Typical examples of the light sources include fluorophores
and QDs, whereas optical antennas generally consist of nanometer-sized
metal structures that exhibit localized surface plasmon resonances
in the optical range. It is worth discussing the advantages of the
DNA origami technique for the fabrication of this type of structures.
Optical antennas have been successfully fabricated using ion or electron
beam lithographic techniques.[157] However,
these top-down approaches have several shortcomings. First, fabrication
is serial by nature and requires specialized and costly equipment.
Second, they often yield rough surfaces and polycrystalline metals
with grains, which hamper the properties of the designed structure
and reduce the resonance quality.[158] However,
the most critical limitation of these techniques is that it is extremely
challenging to position a single light source at the focus of an optical
antenna.[159] In one example, a demanding
multistep lithographic procedure was employed to place a single QD
at the focus of a Yagi-Uda antenna,[160] whereas
in another work an undefined number of fluorophores were immobilized
with the aid of a polymer layer in a region including the focus of
a bow-tie antenna.[157] In contrast to the
top-down approaches, the bottom-up DNA origami technique can overcome
the aforementioned shortcomings. It is parallel in nature and capable
of self-assembling colloidal crystalline metal NPs with higher quality
resonances. Finally, both single light sources and optical antennas
can be self-assembled with nanometer precision and stoichiometric
control.The first experiments in this direction are sketched
in Figure b. The same
rectangular
DNA origami structure was used to study the distance dependent energy
transfer between a single fluorophore and a single 10 nm AuNP[161] (Figure c). This approach enabled a detailed study of the manipulation
of fluorescence with plasmonic NPs at the single molecule level, including
the polarization in near field excitation,[162] the controlled increase in photostability,[163,164] together with the determination of how fluorescence rates are affected
in the vicinity of NPs.[165] The flexibility
of the DNA origami technique was also exploited to self-assemble dimer
antennas (Figure d).
Initial efforts were conducted toward fluorescence enhancement applications
and included two AuNPs (with sizes up to 100 nm) and a single fluorophore
at the hotspot self-assembled onto a 3D pillar shaped DNA origami
structure.[166] The resulting gap between
the NPs was higher than 20 nm which limited the fluorescence enhancement
to 2 orders of magnitude. Additional developments on the NPs incorporation
and origami design[167] lead to a reduction
of the gap to approximately 10 nm and an increase of the fluorescence
enhancement over 3 orders of magnitude.[168] Furthermore, with these results self-assembled optical antennas
managed to outperform top-down lithographic antennas in terms of fluorescence
enhancement and single molecule detection at elevated concentrations.
Recently, dimer antennas based on colloidal silver NPs have been self-assembled
using the DNA origami approach. These structures exhibit a broadband
fluorescence enhancement throughout the visible spectral range.[169] DNA origami based dimer antennas were also
employed for surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) applications
(Figure e). Initial
experiments addressed an undefined number of molecules.[170−172] Single molecule SERS (Figure f) resolution was later attained through a drastic reduction
of the interparticle gap. Two different approaches were followed,
a silver layer was grown onto the AuNPs[173] (Figure g) or shrinking
of the DNA origami structure was thermally induced, reaching a gap
size of a few nanometers.[174] Recently,
strong SERS enhancement and single molecule detection were achieved
using a bowtie antenna composed of two gold triangles on DNA origami.[175] DNA origami structures have also been employed
to study the influence of metal NPs on FRET processes[176] (Figure h). These studies, which further demonstrate the DNA origami
capabilities to self-assemble a pair of fluorophores and a metal NP
in a precise geometry, showed that the energy transfer rate between
the fluorophores can be moderately enhanced. Additionally, energy
transfer along a plasmonic waveguide composed of five metal NPs bound
to a DNA origami structure has also been demonstrated.[114] In this work, the energy transfer along 50
nm could be reversibly switched by changing the position of the center
particle (Figure i).Not only the interaction of fluorophores and optical antennas consisting
of metal NPs has been studied in terms of fluorescence enhancement,
SERS, and FRET efficiency, but also the first steps toward the analysis
of the effect of optical antennas on the emission properties of fluorophores
were taken.[177] Through a combination of
DNA nanotechnology, plasmonics, and super-resolution microscopy, the
quantitative study of the emission coupling of single molecules to
optical nanoantennas revealed that it can lead to mislocalizations
in far-field images (Figure j).Another type of hybrid nanostructure includes the
combination of
DNA origami structures with the top-down lithographic photonic structures.
The first efforts toward the fabrication of these types of hybrid
nanostructures included the use of DNA origami structures as sizing
units to increase the single occupancy of zero-mode waveguides (also
termed nanoapartures)[178] (Figure k). This development could
in principle improve the performance of real-time DNA sequencing approaches.[179] Recently, DNA origami structures have also
been employed to control the coupling between fluorophores and photonic
crystal cavities[180] (Figure i). This approach enabled the mapping of
the local density of states with subwavelength resolution.Finally,
although the DNA origami arises as the most promising
technique to build complex hybrid nanostructures, for some photonic
applications, for example in the field of metamaterials, functionality
is reached through the combination of several nanostructures arranged
in macroarrays. The first steps to creating an array of DNA origami
structures were taken with nanoimprint techniques[181] whereas other approaches such as optical printing[182] or STED lithography[183] have not been explored yet.
Outlook and Future Directions
DNA
origami-based fabrication of nanophotonic systems has advanced
very rapidly in the past decade.[135,184−186] It has become a well-established technique for assembly of metal
NPs into well-defined clusters, 1D chains, 2D arrays, and 3D lattices.[85,89,94,187−192] The ability to assemble various types of NPs into periodic lattices
is very promising for discovery of novel cooperative optical effects.
So far, broader applications of the DNA origami technique for plasmonic
materials, and materials science in general, have been restricted
by the cost of large-scale fabrication. However, very recently biotechnological
methods have been successfully developed for mass-production of DNA
origami structures, significantly decreasing the cost.[193]Incorporation of dynamic responses into
DNA origami-based plasmonic
structures affords extra functionalities. In addition, dynamic DNA
origami-based plasmonic structures are excellent candidates for the
generation of smart plasmonic probes for biochemistry and life sciences.
One of the main advantages of such probes is the unprecedented level
of programmability. Target–probe interactions, transduction
mechanisms, and output signals are highly customizable and can be
tailored to specific needs. Employment of such smart probes also for in vivo monitoring of cellular processes is an open challenge
due to the poor stability of DNA origami structures under physiological
salt conditions. Coating of DNA origami with proteins[194] or peptides containing block copolymers[195,196] has been shown to improve stability. Also, DNA objects based on
the so-called wireframed design are intrinsically more stable at low
salt concentrations compared to densely packed structures.[197,198] In addition, recent developments in utilization of RNA as construction
material[199−201] are expected to expand the category of templates
available for assembly of functional photonics elements. RNA provides
several benefits: the structures can be genetically encoded, can be
expressed, and function inside cells. Furthermore, RNA can fold during
transcription, which eliminates the need for thermal annealing.In order to realize the full potential of the DNA origami technique
and DNA-based imaging approaches in combination with single-molecule
fluorescence for the biological and biomedical application, several
key challenges have to be solved. One of the main roadblocks moving
forward for in situ imaging inside cells will be
labeling: How can one quantitatively (i.e., 1:1 stoichiometry) and
efficiently (ideally 100% target coverage) label proteins inside cells
using DNA molecules. DNA origami structures themselves will not be
suitable as barcoded labeling probes, due to their extended size;
however, they can provide a valuable programmable test platform to
evaluate novel, orthogonal labeling approaches for proteins such as
small molecule binders,[202] nanobodies,[203] or aptamers.[204] Labeling
probes such as the metafluorophores for the intensity barcoding discussed
above could be adapted to only assemble from small, monomeric units
upon detection of a trigger sequence in situ inside
a cell. In combination, novel labeling and imaging approaches using
structural and dynamic DNA nanotechnology could bring Systems Biology
to the single cell level, eventually allowing researchers to analyze
network-wide interactions of a multitude of biomolecules in
situ with highest spatial resolution.The DNA origami
technique enabled tremendous progress in the fabrication
of hybrid structures for photonics applications. Currently, dimer
optical antennas based on metal NPs can reach single molecule SERS
sensitivity and outperform lithographic antennas in terms of fluorescence
enhancement. These developments render DNA origami based optical antennas
into promising devices for diagnostics,[205] DNA sensing,[206,207] and light harvesting[208] applications. Further control of the gap of
dimer optical antennas might be exploited for single molecule strong
coupling studies,[209] among other quantum
effects.[210] The coupling between fluorophores
and optical antennas might be optimized by controlling the relative
orientation. To this end, commercially available doubly linked fluorophores[211] might lead to a much higher control of the
fluorophores dipole moment within the DNA origami structure. Along
this line, for many applications it would be desirable to replace
organic fluorophores with more stable single light sources with improved
photophysical properties.[211] Recently,
QDs[19,24] as well as fluorescent nanodiamonds[25,26] were successfully incorporated to DNA origami structures. However,
nanodiamonds have not been so far combined with optical antennas.
Another promising direction is related to fabrication of optical antennas
based on high-index dielectric NPs using the DNA origami technique.
These particles, of materials such as silicon or germanium among others,
attracted considerable attention since they arise as candidates to
circumvent one of the main shortcomings of metal NPs, which are Joule
losses.[212]The DNA origami technique
provides a flexible platform to meet
future nanofabrication needs in nanophotonics. The origami fabrication
process uses standard biochemistry lab equipment, e.g, thermoscyclers,
centrifuges, etc. Computer-aided design software (caDNAno[33]) and structure predicting tools (CanDo[213]) are intuitive and freely available. All these
factors make this technique accessible to anybody with the basic knowledge
of DNA. We anticipate that this technique will be more adopted by
the general nanophotonic community and will help to complement the
existing nanofabrication toolbox. Without a doubt, such adaptations
will stimulate a plethora of new exciting research areas and real-life
applications.
Authors: Christopher M Green; Kelly Schutt; Noah Morris; Reza M Zadegan; William L Hughes; Wan Kuang; Elton Graugnard Journal: Nanoscale Date: 2017-07-27 Impact factor: 7.790
Authors: Jürgen J Schmied; Andreas Gietl; Phil Holzmeister; Carsten Forthmann; Christian Steinhauer; Thorben Dammeyer; Philip Tinnefeld Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: Thomas E Videbæk; Huang Fang; Daichi Hayakawa; Botond Tyukodi; Michael F Hagan; W Benjamin Rogers Journal: J Phys Condens Matter Date: 2022-01-14 Impact factor: 2.333
Authors: Pengfei Zhan; Maximilian J Urban; Steffen Both; Xiaoyang Duan; Anton Kuzyk; Thomas Weiss; Na Liu Journal: Sci Adv Date: 2019-11-29 Impact factor: 14.136
Authors: Sofia Ojasalo; Petteri Piskunen; Boxuan Shen; Mauri A Kostiainen; Veikko Linko Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) Date: 2021-05-27 Impact factor: 5.076