Literature DB >> 27296227

Single-molecule strong coupling at room temperature in plasmonic nanocavities.

Rohit Chikkaraddy, Bart de Nijs, Felix Benz, Steven J Barrow, Oren A Scherman, Edina Rosta, Angela Demetriadou, Peter Fox, Ortwin Hess, Jeremy J Baumberg.   

Abstract

Photon emitters placed in an optical cavity experience an environment that changes how they are coupled to the surrounding light field. In the weak-coupling regime, the extraction of light from the emitter is enhanced. But more profound effects emerge when single-emitter strong coupling occurs: mixed states are produced that are part light, part matter1, 2, forming building blocks for quantum information systems and for ultralow-power switches and lasers. Such cavity quantum electrodynamics has until now been the preserve of low temperatures and complicated fabrication methods, compromising its use. Here, by scaling the cavity volume to less than 40 cubic nanometres and using host–guest chemistry to align one to ten protectively isolated methylene-blue molecules, we reach the strong-coupling regime at room temperature and in ambient conditions. Dispersion curves from more than 50 such plasmonic nanocavities display characteristic light–matter mixing, with Rabi frequencies of 300 millielectronvolts for ten methylene-blue molecules, decreasing to 90 millielectronvolts for single molecules—matching quantitative models. Statistical analysis of vibrational spectroscopy time series and dark-field scattering spectra provides evidence of single-molecule strong coupling. This dressing of molecules with light can modify photochemistry, opening up the exploration of complex natural processes such as photosynthesis and the possibility of manipulating chemical bonds.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27296227      PMCID: PMC4947385          DOI: 10.1038/nature17974

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


Creating strongly-coupled mixed states from visible light and individual emitters is severely compromised by the hundred-fold difference in their spatial localisation. To overcome this, high-quality cavities are used to boost interaction times and enhance coupling strengths. However in larger cavities the longer round trip for photons to return to the same emitter decreases the coupling, which scales as with the effective cavity volume V. This coupling has to exceed both the cavity loss rate κ and the emitter scattering rate γ, in order for energy to cycle back and forth between matter and light components, requiring 2g > γ, κ.11 For cryogenic emitters5,6 (laser-cooled atoms, vacancies in diamond, or semiconductor quantum dots), the suppressed emitter scattering allows large cavities (with high quality factor Q ∝ κ−1) to reach strong coupling. Severe technical challenges however restrict energy, bandwidth, size and complexity of devices. Progress towards room temperature is limited by the unavoidable increase in emitter scattering, and the difficulty of reducing the volume of dielectric-based microcavities at wavelength λ and refractive index n below V = (λ/n)3. At room temperature, typical scattering rates for embedded dipoles γ ∼ k, implying Q<100 which requires cavities < 10-5 V (Figure 1a, dark green shaded).
Figure 1

Comparing single molecule optical cavities.

a, Cavity Q-factors and effective volumes (compared to V = (λ/n)3), showing strong-coupling (green), room-temperature (blue), and plasmonic (orange) regimes for single emitters. Icons (from right) show whispering gallery sphere, microdisk, photonic crystal, micropillar, and nanoparticle on mirror geometry (NPoM), with Purcell factor P (red) in µm−3. b, Schematic of NPoM, blue arrow in gap locates emitter transition dipole moment. Inset: simulated near-field of coupled gap plasmon in dashed box with maximum electric field enhancement ∼400, oriented vertically (z).

Improved confinement uses surface plasmons (Figure 1a) combining oscillations of free electrons in metals with electromagnetic waves12. While structured metal films can couple molecular aggregates of high oscillator strength, far too many molecules are involved for quantum optics. Recent studies reach 1000 molecules13–15, still far above 1-10 molecules that access quantum effects at room temperature. To create such small nanocavities and orient single molecules precisely within them, we use bottom-up nano-assembly. Although field volumes of individual plasmonic nanostructures are too large1,2, stronger field enhancements occur within sub-nanometre gaps between paired plasmonic nanoparticles. We utilise the promising nanoparticle-on-mirror (NPoM) geometry16, placing emitters in the gap between nanoparticles and a mirror underneath (Figure 1b). This gap is accurately controlled to sub-nm, easily made by depositing monodisperse metal nanoparticles onto a metal film, straightforward to characterise, scalable, and repeatable17,18. The intense interaction between each nanoparticle and its image forms a dimer-like construct with enhancements ||/|| ≃ 103 and an ultralow mode volume. We use 40 nm diameter gold nanoparticles (AuNP) on a 70 nm thick Au film, separated by a 0.9 nm molecular spacer (see below). The coupled plasmonic dipolar mode is localised in the gap (Figure 1b), with electric field oriented vertically (z). The resonant wavelength is determined by nanoparticle size and gap thickness, allowing it to be tuned from λ = 600 − 1200 nm17. Several key aspects are critical to position a quantum emitter inside these small gaps. One is to prevent molecular aggregation, which commonly occurs. Second is to ensure the transition dipole m is perfectly aligned with the gap plasmon (along z). We use a common dye molecule methylene blue (MB) with molecular transition at 665 nm, to which our plasmons are tuned. To avoid aggregation of the dye molecules and to assemble them in the proper orientation, we utilize the host-guest chemistry of macrocyclic cucurbit[n]uril molecules. These are pumpkin-shaped molecules with different hollow hydrophobic internal volume determined by the number of units in the ring n, in which guest molecules can sit (Fig.S1)19. Cucurbit[7]uril (CB[7]) is water soluble and can accommodate only one MB molecule inside. Encapsulation of MB inside CB[7] is confirmed from absorption spectroscopy (Figure 2a) since MB dimers (additional peak at 625nm, red) disappear on mixing low MB concentrations with CB[7] (1:10 molar ratio) (blue). Control experiments with smaller CB[5] molecules (into which MB cannot fit) do not remove this shoulder peak (dashed), ruling out parasitic binding. Placing single MB molecules in CB[7] thus avoids any aggregation. Carbonyl portals at either end of the 0.9 nm-high CB[n] molecules bind them with their rims flat onto the Au surface (Fig.2b). When a monolayer of CB[7] is first deposited on the gold mirror and suitably filled with MB molecules, Au NPs bind on top to form the desired filled nanocavity (Figure 2b, Methods) with the MB molecule aligned vertically in the gap.19 Previous studies with empty CBs show the gap is 0.9 nm with refractive index of 1.417.
Figure 2

Plasmonic nanocavity containing dye molecule.

a, Absorption spectrum of methylene blue (MB) in water, with (blue) and without (red) encapsulation in CBs of different diameter. b, Illustration of a MB molecule in cucurbit[n]uril guest in the nanoparticle on mirror geometry used.

Dark-field scattering spectra from individual NPoMs show the effect of aligning the emitter in different orientations (Figure 3a). With m parallel to the mirror (top, without CB the MB lies flat on the metal surface), the resonant scattering plasmonic peak is identical to NPoMs without any emitters. Instead, with m perpendicular to the mirror (bottom), the spectra show two split peaks (ω and ω) from the strong interaction between emitters and plasmon. We contrast three types of samples. Without dye (Figure 3b, top), a consistent gap plasmon (ω) at 660±10 nm is seen. Small fluctuations in peak wavelength are associated with ±5 nm variations in nanoparticle size (SI Fig.S2). When this NPoM is partially filled with MB inside the CB[7], two peaks at 610 and 750 nm are seen either side of the absorption peak of MB at ω0 (Figure 3b, bottom), corresponding to formation of hybrid plasmon-exciton (‘plexciton’) branches, ω± = ω0 ± g/2. This yields a Rabi frequency g=380meV, confirmed by full 3D finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) simulations (SI Fig.S3). Unlike studies13,14 that show significant variations in ω±, we obtain highly consistent results, with no spectral wandering observed on individual NPoMs. With dye molecules perpendicular to the plasmon field (without CBs), only a gap-plasmon is seen (SI Fig.S4c). Molecules of MB self-assembling on Au orient flat to the surface, due to π-stacking interactions between the conjugated phenyl rings and the metal film20. Such controlled studies are essential to prove molecular coupling to the gap plasmon.
Figure 3

Strong coupling seen in scattering spectra of individual NPoMs.

a, Scattering spectra from isolated NPoM coupled with dye oriented (top) perpendicular and (bottom) parallel to || of gap plasmon (blue dashed line indicates dye absorption wavelength). b, Comparison of scattering spectra from different NPoMs (schematics inset), with gaps filled by CB[7] monolayer which are (top) empty, or (bottom) encapsulating MB dye molecules. c, Resonant positions of MB (), plasmon () and hybrid modes ( and ) as a function of extracted detuning. Marker size depicts the amplitude in scattering spectra.

To map the dispersion curve, we combine scattering spectra from different-sized nanoparticles plotted according to their detuning from the absorption (‘exciton’) resonance. Simulations from 40-60 nm nanoparticles in NPoMs (SI Fig.S5) show gap plasmons tuning across the exciton. A simple coupled-oscillator model matches the quantum mechanical Jaynes-Cummings picture13: with plasmon and exciton resonance energies ωp and ω0, and detuning δ = ω − ω0. Extracting ω from the scattering spectra allows ω to be calculated (knowing ω0 which does not show any spectral wandering). This fitting reveals typical anticrossing behaviour (Figure 3c) with g = 305 ± 8 meV at δ = 0. We find 2g/γ ∼ 5, far into the strong coupling regime. A key figure of merit is the Purcell factor P = Q/V characterising different cavity systems (Figure 1a). For our plasmonic nanocavities P ∼ 3.5 × 106) (SI Fig.S6), over an order of magnitude larger than state of the art photonic crystal cavities5 which have reached 105, while state-of-the-art planar micropillars21,22 attain 3×105. The ultralow cavity volume arises here because field penetration into the gold is strongly reduced for such nanometre gaps (Fig.S9e). Such Purcell factors imply photon emission times below 100fs, seen as the ħ/Ω ∼30fs Rabi flopping, but unfeasibly short to measure directly. To probe single molecule strong coupling, we systematically decrease the number of MB molecules by reducing the ratio of MB:CB[7]. Previous studies and simple area estimates imply 100 CB[7] molecules lie inside each nanocavity (SI Fig.S9). With initial 1:10 molar ratio of MB:CB[7] the mean number of MB molecules within each mode volume is thus . We explore many plasmonic nanocavities with this mean dye number and below (Figure 4a). From the resulting spectra, we extract coupling strengths at different mean MB molecule numbers , and plot these along with the predicted coupling strength: where m = 3.8 D is the transition dipole moment of isolated MB molecules23. The probability of finding each coupling strength (Figure 4a, colour map) follows the Poisson distribution for n molecules under each nanoparticle. The range of Rabi splittings seen for which exceed thermal- and cavity-loss rates at room temperature, are consistent with our plasmonic nanocavity supporting single molecule strong coupling. Reassuringly the range of Rabi frequencies observed increases as the molecular concentration is reduced, as expected since similarly increases as observed in Fig.4a colour map.
Figure 4

Rabi splitting from few molecules.

a, Energy of Rabi oscillations () vs mean number of MB molecules (). Experimental (white) points with range of measured coupling strengths (error bars) and theoretical curve (dashed), colours represent expectation from Poisson probability distribution of . b, Coupling strength extracted from different NPoMs in sample of . Theoretical coupling strength in perfect model (shaded bars) and random placement model (dashed lines). c-e, Scattering spectra for one, two and three molecules corresponding to b, with fits. f, Single-molecule probability histograms for derived from modified principal component analysis (SI S13), yellow bars show single molecule events. Inset shows the signature of the two different probabilities.

Direct proof of single molecule strong coupling is seen from the coupling strengths extracted from the lowest density samples () which show distinct systematic jumps matching the expected increase of g from n = 1 − 3 molecules (Figure 4b, NPoMs sorted by increasing Rabi splitting). The range in each g arises because single molecules are located at different lateral positions within the gap plasmon, thus coupling with different strengths (predictions shown as dashed lines). Experimentally, we find excellent agreement (with no fitting parameters) showing that a single MB molecule in our nanocavities gives 80-95 meV Rabi splittings. Further, we plot the scattering spectrum from n=1−3 molecules exhibiting clear increases in coupling strength. Additional proof of the single-molecule strong coupling is seen from the anti-crossing of plasmon and exciton modes for the subset with n=1 (see SI Fig.S20). Fluorescence emitted by weakly coupled single-molecules follows the Purcell factor24–26. However such measurements fail here because resonantly pumping the molecular absorption also generates strong surface-enhanced resonant Raman scattering (SERRS) consisting of sharp lines with a strong background, that cannot be uniquely separated from photoluminescence (Figure 4c). This also obscures g(2) measurements typically used to confirm single photon emission from individual chromophores. Here we find extremely strong emission even though the dye molecules are within 0.5nm of absorptive gold27, due to the high radiative efficiency of our nanocavities. We harvest these strong SERS peaks to construct ‘chemical’ by using the well-established bianalyte technique with a second near-identical but distinguishable molecule to prove single-molecule statistics (Fig.4f and details in SI S15-17). As clearly evident, at the lowest concentrations we find that two molecules are almost never found at the same time, and we are truly in the single molecule regime. While this does not guarantee direct correlation with single-molecule strong coupling situations it proves the statistical probability of single-molecules at this concentration. Convincing proof of single-molecules is also seen from the spectral diffusion of vibrational lines in time-series SERS scans from nanoparticles exhibiting single-molecule strong coupling (SI Fig.S18,S19). Combining the gap plasmon with oriented host-guest chemistry in aqueous solution to easily create enormous numbers of strongly-coupled few-molecule nanocavities at room temperature, ambient conditions, and which are optically addressable, is of major utility. We expect applications in many fields, including single photon emitters, photon blockade9, quantum chemistry28–30, nonlinear optics, and molecular reactions.
  19 in total

1.  Optical microcavities.

Authors:  Kerry J Vahala
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-08-14       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Vacuum Rabi splitting with a single quantum dot in a photonic crystal nanocavity.

Authors:  T Yoshie; A Scherer; J Hendrickson; G Khitrova; H M Gibbs; G Rupper; C Ell; O B Shchekin; D G Deppe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-11-11       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Near-field mediated plexcitonic coupling and giant Rabi splitting in individual metallic dimers.

Authors:  Andrea E Schlather; Nicolas Large; Alexander S Urban; Peter Nordlander; Naomi J Halas
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 11.189

4.  Realizing Strong Light-Matter Interactions between Single-Nanoparticle Plasmons and Molecular Excitons at Ambient Conditions.

Authors:  Gülis Zengin; Martin Wersäll; Sara Nilsson; Tomasz J Antosiewicz; Mikael Käll; Timur Shegai
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 9.161

5.  Extraordinary exciton conductance induced by strong coupling.

Authors:  Johannes Feist; Francisco J Garcia-Vidal
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 9.161

6.  Unfolding the contents of sub-nm plasmonic gaps using normalising plasmon resonance spectroscopy.

Authors:  Bart de Nijs; Richard W Bowman; Lars O Herrmann; Felix Benz; Steve J Barrow; Jan Mertens; Daniel O Sigle; Rohit Chikkaraddy; Anna Eiden; Andrea Ferrari; Oren A Scherman; Jeremy J Baumberg
Journal:  Faraday Discuss       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.008

7.  Coupling a single trapped atom to a nanoscale optical cavity.

Authors:  J D Thompson; T G Tiecke; N P de Leon; J Feist; A V Akimov; M Gullans; A S Zibrov; V Vuletić; M D Lukin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Control of plasmon emission and dynamics at the transition from classical to quantum coupling.

Authors:  Vasily Kravtsov; Samuel Berweger; Joanna M Atkin; Markus B Raschke
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 11.189

9.  Approaching the strong coupling limit in single plasmonic nanorods interacting with J-aggregates.

Authors:  Gülis Zengin; Göran Johansson; Peter Johansson; Tomasz J Antosiewicz; Mikael Käll; Timur Shegai
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Nanooptics of molecular-shunted plasmonic nanojunctions.

Authors:  Felix Benz; Christos Tserkezis; Lars O Herrmann; Bart de Nijs; Alan Sanders; Daniel O Sigle; Laurynas Pukenas; Stephen D Evans; Javier Aizpurua; Jeremy J Baumberg
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 11.189

View more
  128 in total

1.  Polariton chemistry: Thinking inside the (photon) box.

Authors:  Joel Yuen-Zhou; Vinod M Menon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Spatially defined molecular emitters coupled to plasmonic nanoparticle arrays.

Authors:  Jianxi Liu; Weijia Wang; Danqing Wang; Jingtian Hu; Wendu Ding; Richard D Schaller; George C Schatz; Teri W Odom
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Carbon nanotubes: Wiry matter-light coupling.

Authors:  Jeremy J Baumberg
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 43.841

4.  Atoms and molecules in cavities, from weak to strong coupling in quantum-electrodynamics (QED) chemistry.

Authors:  Johannes Flick; Michael Ruggenthaler; Heiko Appel; Angel Rubio
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Plasmonic Surface Lattice Resonances: A Review of Properties and Applications.

Authors:  V G Kravets; A V Kabashin; W L Barnes; A N Grigorenko
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 60.622

6.  Converting Plasmonic Light Scattering to Confined Light Absorption and Creating Plexcitons by Coupling a Gold Nano-pyramid Array onto a Silica-Gold Film.

Authors:  Peng Zheng; Sujan Kasani; Nianqiang Wu
Journal:  Nanoscale Horiz       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 10.989

Review 7.  Ten years of spasers and plasmonic nanolasers.

Authors:  Shaimaa I Azzam; Alexander V Kildishev; Ren-Min Ma; Cun-Zheng Ning; Rupert Oulton; Vladimir M Shalaev; Mark I Stockman; Jia-Lu Xu; Xiang Zhang
Journal:  Light Sci Appl       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 17.782

8.  Present and Future of Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering.

Authors:  Judith Langer; Dorleta Jimenez de Aberasturi; Javier Aizpurua; Ramon A Alvarez-Puebla; Baptiste Auguié; Jeremy J Baumberg; Guillermo C Bazan; Steven E J Bell; Anja Boisen; Alexandre G Brolo; Jaebum Choo; Dana Cialla-May; Volker Deckert; Laura Fabris; Karen Faulds; F Javier García de Abajo; Royston Goodacre; Duncan Graham; Amanda J Haes; Christy L Haynes; Christian Huck; Tamitake Itoh; Mikael Käll; Janina Kneipp; Nicholas A Kotov; Hua Kuang; Eric C Le Ru; Hiang Kwee Lee; Jian-Feng Li; Xing Yi Ling; Stefan A Maier; Thomas Mayerhöfer; Martin Moskovits; Kei Murakoshi; Jwa-Min Nam; Shuming Nie; Yukihiro Ozaki; Isabel Pastoriza-Santos; Jorge Perez-Juste; Juergen Popp; Annemarie Pucci; Stephanie Reich; Bin Ren; George C Schatz; Timur Shegai; Sebastian Schlücker; Li-Lin Tay; K George Thomas; Zhong-Qun Tian; Richard P Van Duyne; Tuan Vo-Dinh; Yue Wang; Katherine A Willets; Chuanlai Xu; Hongxing Xu; Yikai Xu; Yuko S Yamamoto; Bing Zhao; Luis M Liz-Marzán
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 15.881

9.  Cascaded nanooptics to probe microsecond atomic-scale phenomena.

Authors:  Marlous Kamp; Bart de Nijs; Nuttawut Kongsuwan; Matthias Saba; Rohit Chikkaraddy; Charlie A Readman; William M Deacon; Jack Griffiths; Steven J Barrow; Oluwafemi S Ojambati; Demelza Wright; Junyang Huang; Ortwin Hess; Oren A Scherman; Jeremy J Baumberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Tunable Fluorescence from Dye-Modified DNA-Assembled Plasmonic Nanocube Arrays.

Authors:  Cindy Y Zheng; Edgar Palacios; Wenjie Zhou; Wisnu Hadibrata; Lin Sun; Ziyin Huang; George C Schatz; Koray Aydin; Chad A Mirkin
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 30.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.