Literature DB >> 30199271

Tongue shapes for rhotics in school-age children with and without residual speech errors.

Jonathan L Preston1,2, Patricia McCabe3, Mark Tiede2, Douglas H Whalen4,5.   

Abstract

Speakers of North American English use variable tongue shapes for rhotic sounds. However, quantifying tongue shapes for rhotics can be challenging, and little is known about how tongue shape complexity corresponds to perceptual ratings of rhotic accuracy in children with residual speech sound errors (RSE). In this study, 16 children aged 9-16 with RSE and 14 children with typical speech (TS) development made multiple productions of 'Let Robby cross Church Street'. Midsagittal ultrasound images were collected once for children with TS and twice for children in the RSE group (once after 7 h of speech therapy, then again after another 7 h of therapy). Tongue contours for the rhotics in the four words were traced and quantified using a new metric of tongue shape complexity: the number of inflections. Rhotics were also scored for accuracy by four listeners. During the first assessment, children with RSE had fewer tongue inflections than children with TS. Following 7 h of therapy, there were increases in the number of inflections for the RSE group, with the cluster items cross and Street reaching tongue complexity levels of those with TS. Ratings of rhotic accuracy were correlated with the number of inflections. Therefore, the number of inflections in the tongue, an index of tongue shape complexity, was associated with perceived accuracy of rhotic productions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Rhotic; children; speech sound disorder; tongue; ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30199271      PMCID: PMC6409154          DOI: 10.1080/02699206.2018.1517190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon        ISSN: 0269-9206            Impact factor:   1.346


  24 in total

1.  The Iowa Articulation Norms Project and its Nebraska replication.

Authors:  A B Smit; L Hand; J J Freilinger; J E Bernthal; A Bird
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1990-11

2.  Limited acquisition and generalisation of rhotics with ultrasound visual feedback in childhood apraxia.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Edwin Maas; Jessica Whittle; Megan C Leece; Patricia McCabe
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 1.346

Review 3.  A guide to analysing tongue motion from ultrasound images.

Authors:  Maureen Stone
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2005 Sep-Nov       Impact factor: 1.346

4.  Quantifying lingual coarticulation using ultrasound imaging data collected with and without head stabilisation.

Authors:  Natalia Zharkova; Fiona E Gibbon; William J Hardcastle
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 1.346

5.  Ultrasound Images of the Tongue: A Tutorial for Assessment and Remediation of Speech Sound Errors.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Tara McAllister Byun; Suzanne E Boyce; Sarah Hamilton; Mark Tiede; Emily Phillips; Ahmed Rivera-Campos; Douglas H Whalen
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 1.355

6.  Tongue reading: comparing the interpretation of visual information from inside the mouth, from electropalatographic and ultrasound displays of speech sounds.

Authors:  Joanne Cleland; Caitlin McCron; James M Scobbie
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.346

7.  Perceptual, durational and tongue displacement measures following articulation therapy for rhotic sound errors.

Authors:  Tim Bressmann; Susan Harper; Irina Zhylich; Gajanan V Kulkarni
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 1.346

8.  Contextual-coarticulatory inconsistency of /r/ misarticulation.

Authors:  P R Hoffman; G H Schuckers; D L Ratusnik
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1977-12

Review 9.  The Articulatory Phonetics of /r/ for Residual Speech Errors.

Authors:  Suzanne E Boyce
Journal:  Semin Speech Lang       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 1.761

10.  A magnetic resonance imaging-based articulatory and acoustic study of "retroflex" and "bunched" American English /r/.

Authors:  Xinhui Zhou; Carol Y Espy-Wilson; Suzanne Boyce; Mark Tiede; Christy Holland; Ann Choe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.482

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Tutorial: Motor-Based Treatment Strategies for /r/ Distortions.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Nina R Benway; Megan C Leece; Elaine R Hitchcock; Tara McAllister
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Characterizing sensorimotor profiles in children with residual speech sound disorder: a pilot study.

Authors:  Heather Kabakoff; Olesia Gritsyk; Daphna Harel; Mark Tiede; Jonathan L Preston; D H Whalen; Tara McAllister
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 1.864

3.  Comparing metrics for quantification of children's tongue shape complexity using ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Heather Kabakoff; Sam Pearl Beames; Mark Tiede; D H Whalen; Jonathan L Preston; Tara McAllister
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 1.339

4.  Classification of accurate and misarticulated /ɑr/ for ultrasound biofeedback using tongue part displacement trajectories.

Authors:  Sarah R Li; Sarah Dugan; Jack Masterson; Hannah Hudepohl; Colin Annand; Caroline Spencer; Renee Seward; Michael A Riley; Suzanne Boyce; T Douglas Mast
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 1.339

5.  Neuroimaging of the Syllable Repetition Task in Children With Residual Speech Sound Disorder.

Authors:  Caroline Spencer; Jennifer Vannest; Edwin Maas; Jonathan L Preston; Erin Redle; Thomas Maloney; Suzanne Boyce
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Extending Ultrasound Tongue Shape Complexity Measures to Speech Development and Disorders.

Authors:  Heather Kabakoff; Daphna Harel; Mark Tiede; D H Whalen; Tara McAllister
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 2.297

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.