Literature DB >> 26458201

The Articulatory Phonetics of /r/ for Residual Speech Errors.

Suzanne E Boyce1.   

Abstract

Effective treatment for children with residual speech errors (RSEs) requires in-depth knowledge of articulatory phonetics, but this level of detail may not be provided as part of typical clinical coursework. At a time when new imaging technologies such as ultrasound continue to inform our clinical understanding of speech disorders, incorporating contemporary work in the basic articulatory sciences into clinical training becomes especially important. This is particularly the case for the speech sound most likely to persist among children with RSEs-the North American English rhotic sound, /r/. The goal of this article is to review important information about articulatory phonetics as it affects children with RSE who present with /r/ production difficulties. The data presented are largely drawn from ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging studies. This information will be placed in a clinical context by comparing productions of typical adult speakers to successful versus misarticulated productions of two children with persistent /r/ difficulties. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26458201      PMCID: PMC4915106          DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1562909

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Speech Lang        ISSN: 0734-0478            Impact factor:   1.761


  22 in total

1.  Speech habilitation of hard of hearing adolescents using electropalatography and ultrasound as evaluated by trained listeners.

Authors:  Barbara Bernhardt; Bryan Gick; Penelope Bacsfalvi; Julie Ashdown
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2003 Apr-May       Impact factor: 1.346

2.  Development of [j] in young, midwestern, American children.

Authors:  Richard S McGowan; Susan Nittrouer; Carol J Manning
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Interspeaker variability in hard palate morphology and vowel production.

Authors:  Adam Lammert; Michael Proctor; Shrikanth Narayanan
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Visual feedback in treatment of residual phonological disorders.

Authors:  D M Ruscello
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.288

5.  Temporal patterns of coarticulation: lip rounding.

Authors:  F Bell-Berti; K S Harris
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Phonological processing skills of adolescents with residual speech sound errors.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Mary Louise Edwards
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Retroflex versus bunched in treatment for rhotic misarticulation: evidence from ultrasound biofeedback intervention.

Authors:  Tara McAllister Byun; Elaine R Hitchcock; Michelle T Swartz
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Speech disorders among college freshmen: a 13-year survey.

Authors:  G L Culton
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1986-02

9.  Morphological variation in the adult hard palate and posterior pharyngeal wall.

Authors:  Adam Lammert; Michael Proctor; Shrikanth Narayanan
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Ultrasound as visual feedback in speech habilitation: exploring consultative use in rural British Columbia, Canada.

Authors:  May B Bernhardt; Penelope Bacsfalvi; Marcy Adler-Bock; Reiko Shimizu; Audrey Cheney; Nathan Giesbrecht; Maureen O'connell; Jason Sirianni; Bosko Radanov
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.346

View more
  20 in total

1.  Acquiring rhoticity across languages: An ultrasound study of differentiating tongue movements.

Authors:  Suzanne E Boyce; Sarah M Hamilton; Ahmed Rivera-Campos
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 1.346

2.  Remediating Residual Rhotic Errors With Traditional and Ultrasound-Enhanced Treatment: A Single-Case Experimental Study.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Tara McAllister; Emily Phillips; Suzanne Boyce; Mark Tiede; Jackie Sihyun Kim; Douglas H Whalen
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 2.408

Review 3.  A Diagnostic Marker to Discriminate Childhood Apraxia of Speech From Speech Delay: I. Development and Description of the Pause Marker.

Authors:  Lawrence D Shriberg; Edythe A Strand; Marios Fourakis; Kathy J Jakielski; Sheryl D Hall; Heather B Karlsson; Heather L Mabie; Jane L McSweeny; Christie M Tilkens; David L Wilson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Ultrasound Images of the Tongue: A Tutorial for Assessment and Remediation of Speech Sound Errors.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Tara McAllister Byun; Suzanne E Boyce; Sarah Hamilton; Mark Tiede; Emily Phillips; Ahmed Rivera-Campos; Douglas H Whalen
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  Tongue shapes for rhotics in school-age children with and without residual speech errors.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Patricia McCabe; Mark Tiede; Douglas H Whalen
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 1.346

6.  Acquisition, retention, and generalization of rhotics with and without ultrasound visual feedback.

Authors:  Greta M Sjolie; Megan C Leece; Jonathan L Preston
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 2.288

Review 7.  Tutorial: Motor-Based Treatment Strategies for /r/ Distortions.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Nina R Benway; Megan C Leece; Elaine R Hitchcock; Tara McAllister
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Efficacy of Visual-Acoustic Biofeedback Intervention for Residual Rhotic Errors: A Single-Subject Randomization Study.

Authors:  Tara McAllister Byun
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Treatment for Residual Rhotic Errors With High- and Low-Frequency Ultrasound Visual Feedback: A Single-Case Experimental Design.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Tara McAllister; Emily Phillips; Suzanne Boyce; Mark Tiede; Jackie S Kim; Douglas H Whalen
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Motor-based treatment with and without ultrasound feedback for residual speech-sound errors.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Megan C Leece; Edwin Maas
Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 3.020

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.