Literature DB >> 18537397

A magnetic resonance imaging-based articulatory and acoustic study of "retroflex" and "bunched" American English /r/.

Xinhui Zhou1, Carol Y Espy-Wilson, Suzanne Boyce, Mark Tiede, Christy Holland, Ann Choe.   

Abstract

Speakers of rhotic dialects of North American English show a range of different tongue configurations for /r/. These variants produce acoustic profiles that are indistinguishable for the first three formants [Delattre, P., and Freeman, D. C., (1968). "A dialect study of American English r's by x-ray motion picture," Linguistics 44, 28-69; Westbury, J. R. et al. (1998), "Differences among speakers in lingual articulation for American English /r/," Speech Commun. 26, 203-206]. It is puzzling why this should be so, given the very different vocal tract configurations involved. In this paper, two subjects whose productions of "retroflex" /r/ and "bunched" /r/ show similar patterns of F1-F3 but very different spacing between F4 and F5 are contrasted. Using finite element analysis and area functions based on magnetic resonance images of the vocal tract for sustained productions, the results of computer vocal tract models are compared to actual speech recordings. In particular, formant-cavity affiliations are explored using formant sensitivity functions and vocal tract simple-tube models. The difference in F4/F5 patterns between the subjects is confirmed for several additional subjects with retroflex and bunched vocal tract configurations. The results suggest that the F4/F5 differences between the variants can be largely explained by differences in whether the long cavity behind the palatal constriction acts as a half- or a quarter-wavelength resonator.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18537397      PMCID: PMC2680662          DOI: 10.1121/1.2902168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   2.482


  16 in total

1.  Acoustic modeling of American English /r/.

Authors:  C Y Espy-Wilson; S E Boyce; M Jackson; S Narayanan; A Alwan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Articulatory tradeoffs reduce acoustic variability during American English /r/ production.

Authors:  F H Guenther; C Y Espy-Wilson; S E Boyce; M L Matthies; M Zandipour; J S Perkell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Acoustic characteristics of English /w,r,l/ spoken correctly by young children and adults.

Authors:  R M Dalston
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Speech production knowledge in automatic speech recognition.

Authors:  Simon King; Joe Frankel; Karen Livescu; Erik McDermott; Korin Richmond; Mirjam Wester
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  A probabilistic framework for landmark detection based on phonetic features for automatic speech recognition.

Authors:  Amit Juneja; Carol Espy-Wilson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Analysis of vocal tract shape and dimensions using magnetic resonance imaging: vowels.

Authors:  T Baer; J C Gore; L C Gracco; P W Nye
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Vocal tract area functions from magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  B H Story; I R Titze; E A Hoffman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Toward articulatory-acoustic models for liquid approximants based on MRI and EPG data. Part II. The rhotics.

Authors:  A Alwan; S Narayanan; K Haker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Toward articulatory-acoustic models for liquid approximants based on MRI and EPG data. Part I. The laterals.

Authors:  S S Narayanan; A A Alwan; K Haker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Resonances of a bent vocal tract.

Authors:  M M Sondhi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  25 in total

1.  Effect of body position on vocal tract acoustics: Acoustic pharyngometry and vowel formants.

Authors:  Houri K Vorperian; Sara L Kurtzweil; Marios Fourakis; Ray D Kent; Katelyn K Tillman; Diane Austin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Perception and production of /r/ allophones improve with hearing from a cochlear implant.

Authors:  Melanie L Matthies; Frank H Guenther; Margaret Denny; Joseph S Perkell; Ellen Burton; Jennell Vick; Harlan Lane; Mark Tiede; Majid Zandipour
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Improved vocal tract reconstruction and modeling using an image super-resolution technique.

Authors:  Xinhui Zhou; Jonghye Woo; Maureen Stone; Jerry L Prince; Carol Y Espy-Wilson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The role of vowel perceptual cues in compensatory responses to perturbations of speech auditory feedback.

Authors:  Kevin J Reilly; Kathleen E Dougherty
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Acquiring rhoticity across languages: An ultrasound study of differentiating tongue movements.

Authors:  Suzanne E Boyce; Sarah M Hamilton; Ahmed Rivera-Campos
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 1.346

6.  Effects of a curved vocal tract with grid-generated tongue profile on low-order formants.

Authors:  Paul H Milenkovic; Srikanth Yaddanapudi; Houri K Vorperian; Raymond D Kent
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Variability in individual constriction contributions to third formant values in American English /ɹ/.

Authors:  Sarah Harper; Louis Goldstein; Shrikanth Narayanan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Using electromagnetic articulography with a tongue lateral sensor to discriminate manner of articulation.

Authors:  William F Katz; Sonya Mehta; Matthew Wood; Jun Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Tongue shapes for rhotics in school-age children with and without residual speech errors.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Patricia McCabe; Mark Tiede; Douglas H Whalen
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 1.346

10.  Accelerated three-dimensional upper airway MRI using compressed sensing.

Authors:  Yoon-Chul Kim; Shrikanth S Narayanan; Krishna S Nayak
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.