Literature DB >> 28117824

Ultrasound Images of the Tongue: A Tutorial for Assessment and Remediation of Speech Sound Errors.

Jonathan L Preston1, Tara McAllister Byun2, Suzanne E Boyce3, Sarah Hamilton4, Mark Tiede5, Emily Phillips5, Ahmed Rivera-Campos4, Douglas H Whalen6.   

Abstract

Diagnostic ultrasound imaging has been a common tool in medical practice for several decades. It provides a safe and effective method for imaging structures internal to the body. There has been a recent increase in the use of ultrasound technology to visualize the shape and movements of the tongue during speech, both in typical speakers and in clinical populations. Ultrasound imaging of speech has greatly expanded our understanding of how sounds articulated with the tongue (lingual sounds) are produced. Such information can be particularly valuable for speech-language pathologists. Among other advantages, ultrasound images can be used during speech therapy to provide (1) illustrative models of typical (i.e. "correct") tongue configurations for speech sounds, and (2) a source of insight into the articulatory nature of deviant productions. The images can also be used as an additional source of feedback for clinical populations learning to distinguish their better productions from their incorrect productions, en route to establishing more effective articulatory habits. Ultrasound feedback is increasingly used by scientists and clinicians as both the expertise of the users increases and as the expense of the equipment declines. In this tutorial, procedures are presented for collecting ultrasound images of the tongue in a clinical context. We illustrate these procedures in an extended example featuring one common error sound, American English /r/. Images of correct and distorted /r/ are used to demonstrate (1) how to interpret ultrasound images, (2) how to assess tongue shape during production of speech sounds, (3), how to categorize tongue shape errors, and (4), how to provide visual feedback to elicit a more appropriate and functional tongue shape. We present a sample protocol for using real-time ultrasound images of the tongue for visual feedback to remediate speech sound errors. Additionally, example data are shown to illustrate outcomes with the procedure.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28117824      PMCID: PMC5351819          DOI: 10.3791/55123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  26 in total

1.  Ultrasound in speech therapy with adolescents and adults.

Authors:  Barbara Bernhardt; Bryan Gick; Penelope Bacsfalvi; Marcy Adler-Bock
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2005 Sep-Nov       Impact factor: 1.346

2.  Quantifying lingual coarticulation using ultrasound imaging data collected with and without head stabilisation.

Authors:  Natalia Zharkova; Fiona E Gibbon; William J Hardcastle
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 1.346

3.  Ultrasound biofeedback for speech training. Instrumentation and preliminary results.

Authors:  T H Shawker; B C Sonies
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1985 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.016

4.  Visual feedback in treatment of residual phonological disorders.

Authors:  D M Ruscello
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.288

5.  Covert contrast in velar fronting: An acoustic and ultrasound study.

Authors:  Tara McAllister Byun; Adam Buchwald; Ai Mizoguchi
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 1.346

6.  Using ultrasound visual biofeedback to treat persistent primary speech sound disorders.

Authors:  Joanne Cleland; James M Scobbie; Alan A Wrench
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.346

7.  Retroflex versus bunched in treatment for rhotic misarticulation: evidence from ultrasound biofeedback intervention.

Authors:  Tara McAllister Byun; Elaine R Hitchcock; Michelle T Swartz
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Motor-based treatment with and without ultrasound feedback for residual speech-sound errors.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Megan C Leece; Edwin Maas
Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 9.  The Articulatory Phonetics of /r/ for Residual Speech Errors.

Authors:  Suzanne E Boyce
Journal:  Semin Speech Lang       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 1.761

10.  Ultrasound as visual feedback in speech habilitation: exploring consultative use in rural British Columbia, Canada.

Authors:  May B Bernhardt; Penelope Bacsfalvi; Marcy Adler-Bock; Reiko Shimizu; Audrey Cheney; Nathan Giesbrecht; Maureen O'connell; Jason Sirianni; Bosko Radanov
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.346

View more
  7 in total

1.  Remediating Residual Rhotic Errors With Traditional and Ultrasound-Enhanced Treatment: A Single-Case Experimental Study.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Tara McAllister; Emily Phillips; Suzanne Boyce; Mark Tiede; Jackie Sihyun Kim; Douglas H Whalen
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 2.408

2.  Tongue shapes for rhotics in school-age children with and without residual speech errors.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Patricia McCabe; Mark Tiede; Douglas H Whalen
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 1.346

Review 3.  Tutorial: Motor-Based Treatment Strategies for /r/ Distortions.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Nina R Benway; Megan C Leece; Elaine R Hitchcock; Tara McAllister
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Classification of accurate and misarticulated /ɑr/ for ultrasound biofeedback using tongue part displacement trajectories.

Authors:  Sarah R Li; Sarah Dugan; Jack Masterson; Hannah Hudepohl; Colin Annand; Caroline Spencer; Renee Seward; Michael A Riley; Suzanne Boyce; T Douglas Mast
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 1.339

5.  Do Participants Report Any Undesired Effects in Ultrasound Speech Therapy?

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Gabriela Holliman-Lopez; Megan C Leece
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 2.408

6.  Treatment for Residual Rhotic Errors With High- and Low-Frequency Ultrasound Visual Feedback: A Single-Case Experimental Design.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Tara McAllister; Emily Phillips; Suzanne Boyce; Mark Tiede; Jackie S Kim; Douglas H Whalen
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Auditory Perception and Ultrasound Biofeedback Treatment Outcomes for Children With Residual /ɹ/ Distortions: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Elaine R Hitchcock; Megan C Leece
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 2.297

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.