Literature DB >> 26237652

Limited acquisition and generalisation of rhotics with ultrasound visual feedback in childhood apraxia.

Jonathan L Preston1,2, Edwin Maas3, Jessica Whittle2, Megan C Leece1, Patricia McCabe4.   

Abstract

Ultrasound visual feedback of the tongue is one treatment option for individuals with persisting speech sound errors. This study evaluated children's performance during acquisition and generalisation of American English rhotics using ultrasound feedback. Three children aged 10-13 with persisting speech sound errors associated with childhood apraxia of speech (CAS) were treated for 14 one-hour sessions. Two of the participants increased the accuracy of their rhotic production during practise trials within treatment sessions, but none demonstrated generalisation to untreated words. Lack of generalisation may be due to a failure to acquire the target with sufficient accuracy during treatment, or to co-existing linguistic weaknesses that are not addressed in a motor-based treatment. Results suggest a need to refine the intervention procedures for CAS and/or a need to identify appropriate candidates for intervention to optimise learning.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Childhood apraxia of speech; feedback; rhotics; ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26237652      PMCID: PMC4740254          DOI: 10.3109/02699206.2015.1052563

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon        ISSN: 0269-9206            Impact factor:   1.346


  37 in total

1.  Development of [j] in young, midwestern, American children.

Authors:  Richard S McGowan; Susan Nittrouer; Carol J Manning
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Reliance on auditory feedback in children with childhood apraxia of speech.

Authors:  Jenya Iuzzini-Seigel; Tiffany P Hogan; Anthony J Guarino; Jordan R Green
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 2.288

3.  Mismatch negativity responses in children with a diagnosis of childhood apraxia of speech (CAS).

Authors:  Karen Froud; Reem Khamis-Dakwar
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 2.408

4.  Rating the methodological quality of single-subject designs and n-of-1 trials: introducing the Single-Case Experimental Design (SCED) Scale.

Authors:  Robyn L Tate; Skye McDonald; Michael Perdices; Leanne Togher; Regina Schultz; Sharon Savage
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rehabil       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.868

5.  Random versus blocked practice in treatment for childhood apraxia of speech.

Authors:  Edwin Maas; Kimberly A Farinella
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Extensions to the Speech Disorders Classification System (SDCS).

Authors:  Lawrence D Shriberg; Marios Fourakis; Sheryl D Hall; Heather B Karlsson; Heather L Lohmeier; Jane L McSweeny; Nancy L Potter; Alison R Scheer-Cohen; Edythe A Strand; Christie M Tilkens; David L Wilson
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.346

7.  Token-to-token variability in developmental apraxia of speech: three longitudinal case studies.

Authors:  Thomas P Marquardt; Adam Jacks; Barbara L Davis
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.346

8.  Retroflex versus bunched in treatment for rhotic misarticulation: evidence from ultrasound biofeedback intervention.

Authors:  Tara McAllister Byun; Elaine R Hitchcock; Michelle T Swartz
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Phonetic variability in residual speech sound disorders: Exploration of subtypes.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Laura L Koenig
Journal:  Top Lang Disord       Date:  2011-04

10.  Internal versus external: oral-motor performance as a function of attentional focus.

Authors:  Skott E Freedman; Edwin Maas; Michael P Caligiuri; Gabriele Wulf; Donald A Robin
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.297

View more
  11 in total

1.  A Diagnostic Marker to Discriminate Childhood Apraxia of Speech From Speech Delay: IV. The Pause Marker Index.

Authors:  Lawrence D Shriberg; Edythe A Strand; Marios Fourakis; Kathy J Jakielski; Sheryl D Hall; Heather B Karlsson; Heather L Mabie; Jane L McSweeny; Christie M Tilkens; David L Wilson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Ultrasound Images of the Tongue: A Tutorial for Assessment and Remediation of Speech Sound Errors.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Tara McAllister Byun; Suzanne E Boyce; Sarah Hamilton; Mark Tiede; Emily Phillips; Ahmed Rivera-Campos; Douglas H Whalen
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Tongue shapes for rhotics in school-age children with and without residual speech errors.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Patricia McCabe; Mark Tiede; Douglas H Whalen
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 1.346

4.  Acquisition, retention, and generalization of rhotics with and without ultrasound visual feedback.

Authors:  Greta M Sjolie; Megan C Leece; Jonathan L Preston
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 2.288

Review 5.  Tutorial: Speech Motor Chaining Treatment for School-Age Children With Speech Sound Disorders.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Megan C Leece; Jaclyn Storto
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Do Participants Report Any Undesired Effects in Ultrasound Speech Therapy?

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Gabriela Holliman-Lopez; Megan C Leece
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 2.408

7.  Treatment for Residual Rhotic Errors With High- and Low-Frequency Ultrasound Visual Feedback: A Single-Case Experimental Design.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Tara McAllister; Emily Phillips; Suzanne Boyce; Mark Tiede; Jackie S Kim; Douglas H Whalen
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Motor-based treatment with and without ultrasound feedback for residual speech-sound errors.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Megan C Leece; Edwin Maas
Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 3.020

9.  Variable Practice to Enhance Speech Learning in Ultrasound Biofeedback Treatment for Childhood Apraxia of Speech: A Single Case Experimental Study.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Megan C Leece; Kerry McNamara; Edwin Maas
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 2.408

10.  Tongue Part Movement Trajectories for /r/ Using Ultrasound.

Authors:  Sarah Dugan; Sarah R Li; Jack Masterson; Hannah Woeste; Neeraja Mahalingam; Caroline Spencer; T Douglas Mast; Michael A Riley; Suzanne E Boyce
Journal:  Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups       Date:  2019-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.