Literature DB >> 27819457

More than a boundary shift: Perceptual adaptation to foreign-accented speech reshapes the internal structure of phonetic categories.

Xin Xie1, Rachel M Theodore1, Emily B Myers1.   

Abstract

The literature on perceptual learning for speech shows that listeners use lexical information to disambiguate phonetically ambiguous speech sounds and that they maintain this new mapping for later recognition of ambiguous sounds for a given talker. Evidence for this kind of perceptual reorganization has focused on phonetic category boundary shifts. Here, we asked whether listeners adjust both category boundaries and internal category structure in rapid adaptation to foreign accents. We investigated the perceptual learning of Mandarin-accented productions of word-final voiced stops in English. After exposure to a Mandarin speaker's productions, native-English listeners' adaptation to the talker was tested in 3 ways: a cross-modal priming task to assess spoken word recognition (Experiment 1), a category identification task to assess shifts in the phonetic boundary (Experiment 2), and a goodness rating task to assess internal category structure (Experiment 3). Following exposure, both category boundary and internal category structure were adjusted; moreover, these prelexical changes facilitated subsequent word recognition. Together, the results demonstrate that listeners' sensitivity to acoustic-phonetic detail in the accented input promoted a dynamic, comprehensive reorganization of their perceptual response as a consequence of exposure to the accented input. We suggest that an examination of internal category structure is important for a complete account of the mechanisms of perceptual learning. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27819457      PMCID: PMC5179290          DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  33 in total

1.  Listener sensitivity to individual talker differences in voice-onset-time.

Authors:  J Sean Allen; Joanne L Miller
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Phonetic prototypes: influence of place of articulation and speaking rate on the internal structure of voicing categories.

Authors:  L E Volaitis; J L Miller
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The role of variation in the perception of accented speech.

Authors:  Meghan Sumner
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-12-08

4.  Talker-specific influences on phonetic category structure.

Authors:  Rachel M Theodore; Emily B Myers; Janice A Lomibao
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Perceptual learning in speech: stability over time.

Authors:  Frank Eisner; James M McQueen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Effects of acoustic variability in the perceptual learning of non-native-accented speech sounds.

Authors:  Travis Wade; Allard Jongman; Joan Sereno
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 1.759

7.  Does perceptual learning in speech reflect changes in phonetic category representation or decision bias?

Authors:  Constance M Clarke-Davidson; Paul A Luce; James R Sawusch
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2008-05

8.  The bounds on flexibility in speech perception.

Authors:  Matthias J Sjerps; James M McQueen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Phonetic prototypes.

Authors:  A G Samuel
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-04

10.  The helpfulness of category labels in semi-supervised learning depends on category structure.

Authors:  Wai Keen Vong; Daniel J Navarro; Andrew Perfors
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-02
View more
  9 in total

1.  Lexical exposure to native language dialects can improve non-native phonetic discrimination.

Authors:  Annie J Olmstead; Navin Viswanathan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-04

2.  Lexically guided perceptual learning is robust to task-based changes in listening strategy.

Authors:  Julia R Drouin; Rachel M Theodore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Rapid adaptation to foreign-accented speech and its transfer to an unfamiliar talker.

Authors:  Xin Xie; Kodi Weatherholtz; Larisa Bainton; Emily Rowe; Zachary Burchill; Linda Liu; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Comparing non-native and native speech: Are L2 productions more variable?

Authors:  Xin Xie; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Sleep Facilitates Generalisation of Accent Adaptation to a New Talker.

Authors:  Xin Xie; F Sayako Earle; Emily B Myers
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 2.331

6.  Learning a Talker or Learning an Accent: Acoustic Similarity Constrains Generalization of Foreign Accent Adaptation to New Talkers.

Authors:  Xin Xie; Emily B Myers
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.059

7.  Talker-specific pronunciation or speech error? Discounting (or not) atypical pronunciations during speech perception.

Authors:  Linda Liu; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Cross-talker generalization in the perception of nonnative speech: A large-scale replication.

Authors:  Xin Xie; Linda Liu; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2021-08-09

9.  Individual Differences in Lexical Contributions to Speech Perception.

Authors:  Nikole Giovannone; Rachel M Theodore
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 2.297

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.