Literature DB >> 9017389

RAD9, RAD17, and RAD24 are required for S phase regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae in response to DNA damage.

A G Paulovich1, R U Margulies, B M Garvik, L H Hartwell.   

Abstract

We have previously shown that a checkpoint dependent on MEC1 and RAD53 slows the rate of S phase progression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae in response to alkylation damage. Whereas wild-type cells exhibit a slow S phase in response to damage, mec1-1 and rad53 mutants replicate rapidly in the presence or absence of DNA damage. In this report, we show that other genes (RAD9, RAD17, RAD24) involved in the DNA damage checkpoint pathway also play a role in regulating S phase in response to DNA damage. Furthermore, RAD9, RAD17, and RAD24 fall into two groups with respect to both sensitivity to alkylation and regulation of S phase. We also demonstrate that the more dramatic defect in S phase regulation in the mec1-1 and rad53 mutants is epistatic to a less severe defect seen in rad9 delta, rad 17 delta, and rad24 delta. Furthermore, the triple rad9 delta rad17 delta rad24 delta mutant also has a less severe defect than mec1-1 or rad53 mutants. Finally, we demonstrate the specificity of this phenotype by showing that the DNA repair and/or checkpoint mutants mgt1 delta, mag1 delta, apn1 delta, rev3 delta, rad18 delta, rad16 delta, dun1-delta 100, sad4-1, tel1 delta, rad26 delta, rad51 delta, rad52-1, rad54 delta, rad14 delta, rad1 delta, pol30-46, pol30-52, mad3 delta, pds1 delta/esp2 delta, pms1 delta, mlh1 delta, and msh2 delta are all proficient at S phase regulation, even though some of these mutations confer sensitivity to alkylation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9017389      PMCID: PMC1207783     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  47 in total

Review 1.  Checkpoints: controls that ensure the order of cell cycle events.

Authors:  L H Hartwell; T A Weinert
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-11-03       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  From DNA damage to cell cycle arrest and suicide: a budding yeast perspective.

Authors:  D Lydall; T Weinert
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 5.578

3.  Effect of 32P decay upon DNA synthesis by a radiation-sensitive strain of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  J Cairns; C I Davern
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1966-06       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  One-step gene disruption in yeast.

Authors:  R J Rothstein
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.600

5.  REV3, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene whose function is required for induced mutagenesis, is predicted to encode a nonessential DNA polymerase.

Authors:  A Morrison; R B Christensen; J Alley; A K Beck; E G Bernstine; J F Lemontt; C W Lawrence
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Repair of O6-methylguanine by ABC excinuclease of Escherichia coli in vitro.

Authors:  J M Voigt; B Van Houten; A Sancar; M D Topal
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1989-03-25       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  The RAD9 gene controls the cell cycle response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  T A Weinert; L H Hartwell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-07-15       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Time of replication of ARS elements along yeast chromosome III.

Authors:  A E Reynolds; R M McCarroll; C S Newlon; W L Fangman
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  R S Sikorski; P Hieter
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Alternative pathways for the in vivo repair of O6-alkylguanine and O4-alkylthymine in Escherichia coli: the adaptive response and nucleotide excision repair.

Authors:  L Samson; J Thomale; M F Rajewsky
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  89 in total

Review 1.  Checkpoints: it takes more than time to heal some wounds.

Authors:  N Rhind; P Russell
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2000 Dec 14-28       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Activation of dormant origins of DNA replication in budding yeast.

Authors:  C Santocanale; K Sharma; J F Diffley
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1999-09-15       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  DNA repair protein Rad55 is a terminal substrate of the DNA damage checkpoints.

Authors:  V I Bashkirov; J S King; E V Bashkirova; J Schmuckli-Maurer; W D Heyer
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Suppression of genome instability by redundant S-phase checkpoint pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Kyungjae Myung; Richard D Kolodner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-03-26       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Silent repair accounts for cell cycle specificity in the signaling of oxidative DNA lesions.

Authors:  C Leroy; C Mann; M C Marsolier
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  RAD53, DUN1 and PDS1 define two parallel G2/M checkpoint pathways in budding yeast.

Authors:  R Gardner; C W Putnam; T Weinert
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-06-01       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  Structure and function of the fourth subunit (Dpb4p) of DNA polymerase epsilon in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  T Ohya; S Maki; Y Kawasaki; A Sugino
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  ORC and the intra-S-phase checkpoint: a threshold regulates Rad53p activation in S phase.

Authors:  Kenji Shimada; Philippe Pasero; Susan M Gasser
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2002-12-15       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  The preference for error-free or error-prone postreplication repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae exposed to low-dose methyl methanesulfonate is cell cycle dependent.

Authors:  Dongqing Huang; Brian D Piening; Amanda G Paulovich
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Functional and physical interaction between Rad24 and Rfc5 in the yeast checkpoint pathways.

Authors:  T Shimomura; S Ando; K Matsumoto; K Sugimoto
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.